Bolduc line rushes for Mont

[callitwhatyouwant]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

[a smell of green grass]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

[DawgDad]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

[sdaltons]

Lmao "GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster," isn't even a complete sentence. Much less the end of the story. Unless you don't understand how apostrophes work...

[a smell of green grass]

Lmao "GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster," isn't even a complete sentence. Much less the end of the story. Unless you don't understand how apostrophes work...

The English police arrive when the real cops don't show's up.

[a smell of green grass]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

[The Average Gatsby]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

He wouldn’t be top 4 on the blues. Are you moving Broberg or Fowler to the bottom pair?

[theograce]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

He wouldn’t be top 4 on the blues. Are you moving Broberg or Fowler to the bottom pair?

He’s so much better defensively than Broberg. Different players. I take him over Faulk all day

[The Average Gatsby]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

He wouldn’t be top 4 on the blues. Are you moving Broberg or Fowler to the bottom pair?

He’s so much better defensively than Broberg. Different players. I take him over Faulk all day

I don’t think Mikkola is better than Broberg defensively, but that’s not what the question was. Would you cut Broberg’s minutes to give them to Mikkola?

I agree on Faulk though.

[theograce]

I don’t think Mikkola is better than Broberg defensively, but that’s not what the question was. Would you cut Broberg’s minutes to give them to Mikkola?
I agree on Faulk though.

You build a team. They are different players. Mikkola does things Broberg can’t

[b-a-a-a-rclay]

Every player has to play in all 3 zones. Broberg is a better player right now than Mikkola. If that trade is offered today which team takes it and which team turns it down? I think Fla takes it in a heartbeat ... even if it is only for this season. That's just my opinion.

[a smell of green grass]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

He wouldn’t be top 4 on the blues. Are you moving Broberg or Fowler to the bottom pair?

I love Fowler. I wish we had 30 Fowlers. I wish we drafted a young Fowler this year.

That said, Fowler won't be with us when we are Cup-ready, and thinking/pretending that he is a long-term solution is foolish.

Mikola and Broberg would be 2 solid pieces to build upon.

[The Average Gatsby]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

He wouldn’t be top 4 on the blues. Are you moving Broberg or Fowler to the bottom pair?

I love Fowler. I wish we had 30 Fowlers. I wish we drafted a young Fowler this year.

That said, Fowler won't be with us when we are Cup-ready, and thinking/pretending that he is a long-term solution is foolish.

Mikola and Broberg would be 2 solid pieces to build upon.

Mikkola is 29. Almost 30 year old, average, middle pair defenseman aren’t typically seen as building blocks.

[a smell of green grass]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

He wouldn’t be top 4 on the blues. Are you moving Broberg or Fowler to the bottom pair?

I love Fowler. I wish we had 30 Fowlers. I wish we drafted a young Fowler this year.

That said, Fowler won't be with us when we are Cup-ready, and thinking/pretending that he is a long-term solution is foolish.

Mikola and Broberg would be 2 solid pieces to build upon.

Mikkola is 29. Almost 30 year old, average, middle pair defenseman aren’t typically seen as building blocks.

Niko Mikkola signed a 8 year, $40000000 contract with the Florida Panthers with an average annual salary of $5000000.

Is 8 years not enough to build upon?

[O.O]

I don’t think Mikkola is better than Broberg defensively, but that’s not what the question was. Would you cut Broberg’s minutes to give them to Mikkola?
I agree on Faulk though.

You build a team. They are different players. Mikkola does things Broberg can’t

like what ?

[The Average Gatsby]

Anyone not leary about Bolduc tearing it up is ignoring history. When Army lets go of a player, that player has often become a huge contributor on Stanley Cup winner, and they eventually sign a huge long-term deal.

Bolduc could very easily become the next Mikola, etc.

Mikkola won a cup with the Rangers?

Mikola began his career with the Blues.
Mikola won a Stanley Cup with Florida.
Mikola signed a LTD with Florida.

Ok but Army let go of him? Or Army traded him to the Rangers? Why did the Rangers let go of him and not resign him? Weird.

Mikola is a young prospect that won a Stanley Cup.
The Blues would be much better right now on defense if Mikola was still a Blue.
Thank Army for Mikola not being here.
GM's are responsible for the talent on the roster.
End of Story.

Whoa, there. Mikkola has filled a void in Florida and has done a real good job, improving each season. He is not top-4 on this Blues team, not from this point forward. Let's not make Niko out to be more than he really is as a player.

Mikola is currently top4 on florida for many years, only behind Forsling but he wouldn't be top4 on the Blues.
Sure.

He wouldn’t be top 4 on the blues. Are you moving Broberg or Fowler to the bottom pair?

I love Fowler. I wish we had 30 Fowlers. I wish we drafted a young Fowler this year.

That said, Fowler won't be with us when we are Cup-ready, and thinking/pretending that he is a long-term solution is foolish.

Mikola and Broberg would be 2 solid pieces to build upon.

Mikkola is 29. Almost 30 year old, average, middle pair defenseman aren’t typically seen as building blocks.

Niko Mikkola signed a 8 year, $40000000 contract with the Florida Panthers with an average annual salary of $5000000.

Is 8 years not enough to build upon?

Look, I don’t really want to explain how age and the passage of time works right now. You could google it though.