I propose FA Miguel Andujar or possible FA Luis Robert Jr.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 10:24 amI’ve also said for years that we need an All-Star outfielder.Melville wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 09:49 am It is too soon to determine the Bloom/DeWitt objective for 2026 and beyond.
Perhaps they drag payroll even lower, perhaps they want to scrape to the bare earth and start over.
But that isn't necessary.
If they desire for the team to win at least 85/86 games next year, and 90+ in years following, it can be accomplished quite easily.
The organization can be fixed in 30 days or less - and I am happy to provide the correct roadmap.
But strategic decision making can only be effective if based on current data.
So, let’s start there.
First, the adequate and the good.
The 2025 STL offense was almost exactly middle of the pack in both BA (.245 with .247 being the MLB midpoint) and OBP (.314 vs. .315 midpoint.)
Note concerning OBP – only Nootbaar (11%) and Gorman (12%) drew walks at an above average rate.
Strikeouts were not really an issue since the team was just 40 above the MLB midpoint for the entire season.
STL excelled at hitting doubles, ranking 10 best and a reason for optimism.
No significant issues in those metrics.
Now the bad.
29th in HR (only 4 players were on pace for 20+ HR per 600 PA’s (Contreras, Herrera, Gorman, Burleson).
30th in triples.
20th in SB, with only Scott surpassing 10 for the year.
Team was 7th worst at GIDP with 115 (Herrera worst by a wide margin with 20; Gorman best with just 1).
These facts dictate why the team was 19th in MLB in runs scored, and 12th out of 16 NL team.
The outfield was easily the primary issue for the offense: the 3 starters (Nootbaar/Scott/Walker) scored a pathetic 68, 54, and 40 runs, while “driving in” an even worse 48, 41, and 37.
As I alone was first and best to analyze and explain many years ago, the outfield is the area of horrific weakness and currently has zero adequate starters.
Next, let’s look at roster construction going into 2026, examining the 15 position players most likely under consideration for a roster spot.
LH – BURLESON, DONOVAN, WETHERHOLT, CROOKS, GORMAN, NOOTBAAR, SCOTT, CHURCH
RH – WALKER, PAGES, CONTRERAS, HERRERA, WINN, SAGGESE, FERMIN
4 outfielders, 8 infielders, 2 catchers, 1 with no real position.
What does the data establish?
The outfield is a disaster.
Overall, the lineup has not enough power, is too slow, has too many LH bats.
Here is the roster solution for 2026 and the correct off-season plan to achieve it:
The team simply cannot trade what little power it has, meaning Contreras (1B/DH), Burleson (1B, DH, RF), Gorman (3B/2B,1B), and Herrera (TBD) must be retained for 2026.
The team can ill afford to get even slower, so Scott must be retained in CF and be given another opportunity.
No discussion needed that Winn must return at SS - primarily for the glove but the bat is certainly more than adequate on a properly constructed roster.
A RH/LH tandem of Pages/Crooks at catcher is the most probable at that spot.
Herrera's power may or may not be real (he hit nearly 2/3 of his HR in just 4 weeks), but he needs to find a position, with outfield being the best option while rotating through DH appearances.
Wetherholt is going to play (2B is best option) and if he hits, he should belong at leadoff - but it will be wise to have insurance.
That leaves Nootbaar, Donovan, Church, Walker, Saggese, and Fermin as the question marks.
Here is the correct answer to each.
Trade Nootbaar.
Trade Walker.
Trade Saggese or Fermin, whichever is preferred by an acquiring team as part of a larger package.
Move Donovan to LF - and he doubles as infield insurance in the event of underperformance.
Church is a passable 5th outfielder - but a RH hitting bench CF option might be an upgrade (worth noting that Joshua Baez should get long looks in CF in Memphis to begin 2026).
This is the 100% correct answer with each of the current roster options.
But it leaves one critical need unmet.
The team simply must add a RH hitting, ASG quality, productive, middle order bat (3rd or 4th) outfield bat - as I alone have unerringly and consistently stated for 5+ years.
By shopping/packaging Nootbaar, Walker, Saggese or Fermin, as well as 40-man roster fillers Pozo, Prieto, Koperniak, & Siani, along with prospects such as Bernal and C. Davis, there are plenty of trade pieces available (pitchers will be discussed later) to make that acquisition.
Finally, depending on a number of factors, this would potentially leave the team with one extra LH bat (Burleson, Donovan, Gorman, Scott) to use as a trade piece in July to address needs which emerge before the trade deadline - but these 4 should be retained until then.
There you have it.
The 100% fully accurate plan (completely unbiased, of course), to address position player roster decisions for 2026 and beyond.
My 100% fully accurate plan for the pitching staff will likely be provided this evening.
If STL does precisely as I advise, the team will win 85+games next season.
I give my personal guarantee.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
But what names do you propose? Other than Bader and Reynolds who might even be available?
The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
I would like to respectfully request people STOP QUOTING MELVILLE'S FULL POST.
We know what the thread is about and you are cluttering the world.
THANK-YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
We know what the thread is about and you are cluttering the world.
THANK-YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
I have the same issue with giving Gorman a 5th year.Imperial Capitalist wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 10:33 am Victor Scott's slg % didn't even equal Trey Turner's batting average, yet we should give him a 3rd year/chance to prove he can't hit?![]()
I mean maybe we get to 84 wins and a WC with just a new moto OFer and fixing the rotation. But we are never getting to 90-95 wins long term with Gorman as starting 3b and Scott as everyday CF.
Melville hasn’t shared how we feasibly improve after 2026
Last edited by Carp4Cy on 30 Sep 2025 13:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
her name is ME villeimetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 13:13 pm I would like to respectfully request people STOP QUOTING MELVILLE'S FULL POST.
We know what the thread is about and you are cluttering the world.
THANK-YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
That will be determined after team have their annual org meetings in the next 4 weeks and after the QA and tender deadlines following the WS.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 10:24 amI’ve also said for years that we need an All-Star outfielder.Melville wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 09:49 am It is too soon to determine the Bloom/DeWitt objective for 2026 and beyond.
Perhaps they drag payroll even lower, perhaps they want to scrape to the bare earth and start over.
But that isn't necessary.
If they desire for the team to win at least 85/86 games next year, and 90+ in years following, it can be accomplished quite easily.
The organization can be fixed in 30 days or less - and I am happy to provide the correct roadmap.
But strategic decision making can only be effective if based on current data.
So, let’s start there.
First, the adequate and the good.
The 2025 STL offense was almost exactly middle of the pack in both BA (.245 with .247 being the MLB midpoint) and OBP (.314 vs. .315 midpoint.)
Note concerning OBP – only Nootbaar (11%) and Gorman (12%) drew walks at an above average rate.
Strikeouts were not really an issue since the team was just 40 above the MLB midpoint for the entire season.
STL excelled at hitting doubles, ranking 10 best and a reason for optimism.
No significant issues in those metrics.
Now the bad.
29th in HR (only 4 players were on pace for 20+ HR per 600 PA’s (Contreras, Herrera, Gorman, Burleson).
30th in triples.
20th in SB, with only Scott surpassing 10 for the year.
Team was 7th worst at GIDP with 115 (Herrera worst by a wide margin with 20; Gorman best with just 1).
These facts dictate why the team was 19th in MLB in runs scored, and 12th out of 16 NL team.
The outfield was easily the primary issue for the offense: the 3 starters (Nootbaar/Scott/Walker) scored a pathetic 68, 54, and 40 runs, while “driving in” an even worse 48, 41, and 37.
As I alone was first and best to analyze and explain many years ago, the outfield is the area of horrific weakness and currently has zero adequate starters.
Next, let’s look at roster construction going into 2026, examining the 15 position players most likely under consideration for a roster spot.
LH – BURLESON, DONOVAN, WETHERHOLT, CROOKS, GORMAN, NOOTBAAR, SCOTT, CHURCH
RH – WALKER, PAGES, CONTRERAS, HERRERA, WINN, SAGGESE, FERMIN
4 outfielders, 8 infielders, 2 catchers, 1 with no real position.
What does the data establish?
The outfield is a disaster.
Overall, the lineup has not enough power, is too slow, has too many LH bats.
Here is the roster solution for 2026 and the correct off-season plan to achieve it:
The team simply cannot trade what little power it has, meaning Contreras (1B/DH), Burleson (1B, DH, RF), Gorman (3B/2B,1B), and Herrera (TBD) must be retained for 2026.
The team can ill afford to get even slower, so Scott must be retained in CF and be given another opportunity.
No discussion needed that Winn must return at SS - primarily for the glove but the bat is certainly more than adequate on a properly constructed roster.
A RH/LH tandem of Pages/Crooks at catcher is the most probable at that spot.
Herrera's power may or may not be real (he hit nearly 2/3 of his HR in just 4 weeks), but he needs to find a position, with outfield being the best option while rotating through DH appearances.
Wetherholt is going to play (2B is best option) and if he hits, he should belong at leadoff - but it will be wise to have insurance.
That leaves Nootbaar, Donovan, Church, Walker, Saggese, and Fermin as the question marks.
Here is the correct answer to each.
Trade Nootbaar.
Trade Walker.
Trade Saggese or Fermin, whichever is preferred by an acquiring team as part of a larger package.
Move Donovan to LF - and he doubles as infield insurance in the event of underperformance.
Church is a passable 5th outfielder - but a RH hitting bench CF option might be an upgrade (worth noting that Joshua Baez should get long looks in CF in Memphis to begin 2026).
This is the 100% correct answer with each of the current roster options.
But it leaves one critical need unmet.
The team simply must add a RH hitting, ASG quality, productive, middle order bat (3rd or 4th) outfield bat - as I alone have unerringly and consistently stated for 5+ years.
By shopping/packaging Nootbaar, Walker, Saggese or Fermin, as well as 40-man roster fillers Pozo, Prieto, Koperniak, & Siani, along with prospects such as Bernal and C. Davis, there are plenty of trade pieces available (pitchers will be discussed later) to make that acquisition.
Finally, depending on a number of factors, this would potentially leave the team with one extra LH bat (Burleson, Donovan, Gorman, Scott) to use as a trade piece in July to address needs which emerge before the trade deadline - but these 4 should be retained until then.
There you have it.
The 100% fully accurate plan (completely unbiased, of course), to address position player roster decisions for 2026 and beyond.
My 100% fully accurate plan for the pitching staff will likely be provided this evening.
If STL does precisely as I advise, the team will win 85+games next season.
I give my personal guarantee.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
But what names do you propose? Other than Bader and Reynolds who might even be available?
I have some names in mind already and will add to that list in the weeks ahead.
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Point very well taken Satch!imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 13:13 pm I would like to respectfully request people STOP QUOTING MELVILLE'S FULL POST.
We know what the thread is about and you are cluttering the world.
THANK-YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
I’ll do my best to abide by your advice.
ME-ville is an attention seeking narcissist and I and others have been feeding him.
Take Care!
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Extremely prescient point.Bully4you wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 10:27 amGoing to need to trade for that piece.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 10:24 amI’ve also said for years that we need an All-Star outfielder.Melville wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 09:49 am It is too soon to determine the Bloom/DeWitt objective for 2026 and beyond.
Perhaps they drag payroll even lower, perhaps they want to scrape to the bare earth and start over.
But that isn't necessary.
If they desire for the team to win at least 85/86 games next year, and 90+ in years following, it can be accomplished quite easily.
The organization can be fixed in 30 days or less - and I am happy to provide the correct roadmap.
But strategic decision making can only be effective if based on current data.
So, let’s start there.
First, the adequate and the good.
The 2025 STL offense was almost exactly middle of the pack in both BA (.245 with .247 being the MLB midpoint) and OBP (.314 vs. .315 midpoint.)
Note concerning OBP – only Nootbaar (11%) and Gorman (12%) drew walks at an above average rate.
Strikeouts were not really an issue since the team was just 40 above the MLB midpoint for the entire season.
STL excelled at hitting doubles, ranking 10 best and a reason for optimism.
No significant issues in those metrics.
Now the bad.
29th in HR (only 4 players were on pace for 20+ HR per 600 PA’s (Contreras, Herrera, Gorman, Burleson).
30th in triples.
20th in SB, with only Scott surpassing 10 for the year.
Team was 7th worst at GIDP with 115 (Herrera worst by a wide margin with 20; Gorman best with just 1).
These facts dictate why the team was 19th in MLB in runs scored, and 12th out of 16 NL team.
The outfield was easily the primary issue for the offense: the 3 starters (Nootbaar/Scott/Walker) scored a pathetic 68, 54, and 40 runs, while “driving in” an even worse 48, 41, and 37.
As I alone was first and best to analyze and explain many years ago, the outfield is the area of horrific weakness and currently has zero adequate starters.
Next, let’s look at roster construction going into 2026, examining the 15 position players most likely under consideration for a roster spot.
LH – BURLESON, DONOVAN, WETHERHOLT, CROOKS, GORMAN, NOOTBAAR, SCOTT, CHURCH
RH – WALKER, PAGES, CONTRERAS, HERRERA, WINN, SAGGESE, FERMIN
4 outfielders, 8 infielders, 2 catchers, 1 with no real position.
What does the data establish?
The outfield is a disaster.
Overall, the lineup has not enough power, is too slow, has too many LH bats.
Here is the roster solution for 2026 and the correct off-season plan to achieve it:
The team simply cannot trade what little power it has, meaning Contreras (1B/DH), Burleson (1B, DH, RF), Gorman (3B/2B,1B), and Herrera (TBD) must be retained for 2026.
The team can ill afford to get even slower, so Scott must be retained in CF and be given another opportunity.
No discussion needed that Winn must return at SS - primarily for the glove but the bat is certainly more than adequate on a properly constructed roster.
A RH/LH tandem of Pages/Crooks at catcher is the most probable at that spot.
Herrera's power may or may not be real (he hit nearly 2/3 of his HR in just 4 weeks), but he needs to find a position, with outfield being the best option while rotating through DH appearances.
Wetherholt is going to play (2B is best option) and if he hits, he should belong at leadoff - but it will be wise to have insurance.
That leaves Nootbaar, Donovan, Church, Walker, Saggese, and Fermin as the question marks.
Here is the correct answer to each.
Trade Nootbaar.
Trade Walker.
Trade Saggese or Fermin, whichever is preferred by an acquiring team as part of a larger package.
Move Donovan to LF - and he doubles as infield insurance in the event of underperformance.
Church is a passable 5th outfielder - but a RH hitting bench CF option might be an upgrade (worth noting that Joshua Baez should get long looks in CF in Memphis to begin 2026).
This is the 100% correct answer with each of the current roster options.
But it leaves one critical need unmet.
The team simply must add a RH hitting, ASG quality, productive, middle order bat (3rd or 4th) outfield bat - as I alone have unerringly and consistently stated for 5+ years.
By shopping/packaging Nootbaar, Walker, Saggese or Fermin, as well as 40-man roster fillers Pozo, Prieto, Koperniak, & Siani, along with prospects such as Bernal and C. Davis, there are plenty of trade pieces available (pitchers will be discussed later) to make that acquisition.
Finally, depending on a number of factors, this would potentially leave the team with one extra LH bat (Burleson, Donovan, Gorman, Scott) to use as a trade piece in July to address needs which emerge before the trade deadline - but these 4 should be retained until then.
There you have it.
The 100% fully accurate plan (completely unbiased, of course), to address position player roster decisions for 2026 and beyond.
My 100% fully accurate plan for the pitching staff will likely be provided this evening.
If STL does precisely as I advise, the team will win 85+games next season.
I give my personal guarantee.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
But what names do you propose? Other than Bader and Reynolds who might even be available?
We might have it in the farm system, but it's probably a few years away.
Have to look around the league and make a deal.
May have to even overpay.
Yes, an overpay may well be required - and other teams do so routinely to acquire the targeted pieces.
STL is in a perfect place to do so - Bernal, Walker, Nootbaar, Saggese, C. Davis have varying degrees of value (as do pitchers who I will identify later) and there are quite a few secondary pieces who should be made available as well.
The Cardinals have over a dozen players who can be mixed-n-matched to find a trade partner fit.
Not every organization is in that position.
Yes, a 4 for 1 deal, or 5 for 1 deal might be required.
And the Cardinals can do so.
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Nope.Imperial Capitalist wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 10:33 am Victor Scott's slg % didn't even equal Trey Turner's batting average, yet we should give him a 3rd year/chance to prove he can't hit?![]()
I said he should be given until the end of next July to improve his bat.
STL does not have a better option than him right now - and he is the only player who is a threat on the bases.
It would be stupid to make a slow team slower.
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Yes, sir, Mr. Forum Monitor, sir! Thank you for your assholishness in this matter!imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 13:13 pm I would like to respectfully request people STOP QUOTING MELVILLE'S FULL POST.
We know what the thread is about and you are cluttering the world.
THANK-YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Is he available?? That would eliminate the need for a 1 hitter and 1 pitcher. Like your thinking Satch…..imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 11:13 am Melville, I do not get the attraction to Gorman.
When someone shows you who they are, believe it.
And who he is is someone who is simply horrid defensively, has an OPS+ in the 80's, a flat WAR and barely hit over the Mendoza line. If we indeed have to keep this dulled, bright shiny object because "the team simply cannot trade what little power it has," then we are utterly screwed.
Finally, I hope we keep Fermin. I was impressed with his approach overall, and his intensity at the plate. He strikes me as another potential Donovan-whom I also do not wish to trade.
Sign
Bellinger
Tucker
TGKS
And a top SP
Your rebuild is about done. SIMPLE![]()
What, no Otani?
Point is this isn’t complicated. Throw some money at legit starters and it can turn around quickly. Dump NA, perhaps WC….only one BDW would be paying is Gray. Should have 80-90 mil to play with
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Never for or against any player.imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 11:13 am Melville, I do not get the attraction to Gorman.
When someone shows you who they are, believe it.
And who he is is someone who is simply horrid defensively, has an OPS+ in the 80's, a flat WAR and barely hit over the Mendoza line. If we indeed have to keep this dulled, bright shiny object because "the team simply cannot trade what little power it has," then we are utterly screwed.
Finally, I hope we keep Fermin. I was impressed with his approach overall, and his intensity at the plate. He strikes me as another potential Donovan-whom I also do not wish to trade.
Sign
Bellinger
Tucker
TGKS
And a top SP
Your rebuild is about done. SIMPLE![]()
What, no Otani?
I simply correctly analyze based on facts.
A team 29th in HR is in no position to trade away power.
The team has just 4 players capable of hitting 20 HR - and just 2 are LH.
Further, Gorman is the only one who has ever hit 25+.
Like it or not, those 4 must stay for 2026 and more power must be added around them.
That is what the data requires.
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
You read it twice - and took notes.Adam2 wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 11:18 amthis bored meMelville wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 09:49 am It is too soon to determine the Bloom/DeWitt objective for 2026 and beyond.
Perhaps they drag payroll even lower, perhaps they want to scrape to the bare earth and start over.
But that isn't necessary.
If they desire for the team to win at least 85/86 games next year, and 90+ in years following, it can be accomplished quite easily.
The organization can be fixed in 30 days or less - and I am happy to provide the correct roadmap.
But strategic decision making can only be effective if based on current data.
So, let’s start there.
First, the adequate and the good.
The 2025 STL offense was almost exactly middle of the pack in both BA (.245 with .247 being the MLB midpoint) and OBP (.314 vs. .315 midpoint.)
Note concerning OBP – only Nootbaar (11%) and Gorman (12%) drew walks at an above average rate.
Strikeouts were not really an issue since the team was just 40 above the MLB midpoint for the entire season.
STL excelled at hitting doubles, ranking 10 best and a reason for optimism.
No significant issues in those metrics.
Now the bad.
29th in HR (only 4 players were on pace for 20+ HR per 600 PA’s (Contreras, Herrera, Gorman, Burleson).
30th in triples.
20th in SB, with only Scott surpassing 10 for the year.
Team was 7th worst at GIDP with 115 (Herrera worst by a wide margin with 20; Gorman best with just 1).
These facts dictate why the team was 19th in MLB in runs scored, and 12th out of 16 NL team.
The outfield was easily the primary issue for the offense: the 3 starters (Nootbaar/Scott/Walker) scored a pathetic 68, 54, and 40 runs, while “driving in” an even worse 48, 41, and 37.
As I alone was first and best to analyze and explain many years ago, the outfield is the area of horrific weakness and currently has zero adequate starters.
Next, let’s look at roster construction going into 2026, examining the 15 position players most likely under consideration for a roster spot.
LH – BURLESON, DONOVAN, WETHERHOLT, CROOKS, GORMAN, NOOTBAAR, SCOTT, CHURCH
RH – WALKER, PAGES, CONTRERAS, HERRERA, WINN, SAGGESE, FERMIN
4 outfielders, 8 infielders, 2 catchers, 1 with no real position.
What does the data establish?
The outfield is a disaster.
Overall, the lineup has not enough power, is too slow, has too many LH bats.
Here is the roster solution for 2026 and the correct off-season plan to achieve it:
The team simply cannot trade what little power it has, meaning Contreras (1B/DH), Burleson (1B, DH, RF), Gorman (3B/2B,1B), and Herrera (TBD) must be retained for 2026.
The team can ill afford to get even slower, so Scott must be retained in CF and be given another opportunity.
No discussion needed that Winn must return at SS - primarily for the glove but the bat is certainly more than adequate on a properly constructed roster.
A RH/LH tandem of Pages/Crooks at catcher is the most probable at that spot.
Herrera's power may or may not be real (he hit nearly 2/3 of his HR in just 4 weeks), but he needs to find a position, with outfield being the best option while rotating through DH appearances.
Wetherholt is going to play (2B is best option) and if he hits, he should belong at leadoff - but it will be wise to have insurance.
That leaves Nootbaar, Donovan, Church, Walker, Saggese, and Fermin as the question marks.
Here is the correct answer to each.
Trade Nootbaar.
Trade Walker.
Trade Saggese or Fermin, whichever is preferred by an acquiring team as part of a larger package.
Move Donovan to LF - and he doubles as infield insurance in the event of underperformance.
Church is a passable 5th outfielder - but a RH hitting bench CF option might be an upgrade (worth noting that Joshua Baez should get long looks in CF in Memphis to begin 2026).
This is the 100% correct answer with each of the current roster options.
But it leaves one critical need unmet.
The team simply must add a RH hitting, ASG quality, productive, middle order bat (3rd or 4th) outfield bat - as I alone have unerringly and consistently stated for 5+ years.
By shopping/packaging Nootbaar, Walker, Saggese or Fermin, as well as 40-man roster fillers Pozo, Prieto, Koperniak, & Siani, along with prospects such as Bernal and C. Davis, there are plenty of trade pieces available (pitchers will be discussed later) to make that acquisition.
Finally, depending on a number of factors, this would potentially leave the team with one extra LH bat (Burleson, Donovan, Gorman, Scott) to use as a trade piece in July to address needs which emerge before the trade deadline - but these 4 should be retained until then.
There you have it.
The 100% fully accurate plan (completely unbiased, of course), to address position player roster decisions for 2026 and beyond.
My 100% fully accurate plan for the pitching staff will likely be provided this evening.
If STL does precisely as I advise, the team will win 85+games next season.
I give my personal guarantee.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
All for now.
More later.
More later.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 353
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:11 pm
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Agreed.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 13:14 pmhave the same issue with giving Gorman a 5th year.Imperial Capitalist wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025 10:33 am Victor Scott's slg % didn't even equal Trey Turner's batting average, yet we should give him a 3rd year/chance to prove he can't hit?![]()
I mean maybe we get to 84 wins and a WC with just a new moto OFer and fixing the rotation. But we are never getting to 90-95 wins long term with Gorman as starting 3b and Scott as everyday CF.
Melville hasn’t shared how we feasibly improve after 2026
At this point we know who Nolan Gorman is: He struggles to finish above .200, his slg% is in decline, his contact rate...sheesh, and knowing whether he's compromised by injury (lower back), a skill set he simply cannot build upon, or both, is anyone's guess.
From 6/2023 - now, Gorman has had 7 months where he's batted less than .200. Slumps happen & BA may not be the go-to stat anymore, but that level of inability to put the bat on the ball destroys whatever momentum he builds in the other months - which aren't exactly HOF-esque in nature to begin with.
Re: The CORRECT plan to win 85 games next year and 90+ following.
Great analysis! I think the pitching will be much tougher as we have many young question marks!