Sorry it's not on the ownership

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Youboughtit
Forum User
Posts: 4019
Joined: 06 Oct 2020 15:45 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by Youboughtit »

shebashab wrote: 08 Jul 2025 11:00 am
Youboughtit wrote: 08 Jul 2025 10:29 am
shebashab wrote: 08 Jul 2025 09:56 am Baseball is broke and it's not getting fixed. The days of doing development better than the big clubs is gone as all the big clubs took notice and invested accordingly. The only teams really in contention are leading their respective division in payroll. Same as last year and will be the same next year. Tampa is the best at small market competition and even they are struggling the last two years. At this point the Cardinals are in no mans land, they can't spend enough to compete and the market they live in will demand competitive teams... not sustainable in todays landscape.

NL East Top payroll Mets & Phillies . First place Phillies followed closely by Mets.
NL Central top payroll Cubs First place Cubs
NL West top payroll Dodgers (followed by Giants) first place Dodgers (followed by Giants)
AL East top payroll Bluejays & Yankees (both top 5) first place Bluejays followed by Yankees
AL Central top payroll tie Tigers and Twins first place Tigers
AL West top payroll Astros first place Astros.

The smoke and mirrors of adding another wildcard to make teams think they are competitive doesn’t do it for me. Baseball just continues to run the sport without the fans in mind. Sad, I’ve been a lifelong baseball fan but I can’t get myself to care much anymore. Ownership has no real chance to have a consistent winner unless you are in a large market. The Dodgers can pay its whole ridiculous payroll with the difference in revenue between the Cardinals and Dodgers. I wish I could just hate DeWitt... instead I hate how baseball is run. Sad
The proven formula for the Cardinals is top 5 farm and top 10 payroll. That is $215m. Do that and they will get their 3.4m fans and make as much profit as this $135m payroll and what I suspect will be 1.5m fans. Boras reported the General fund alone paid out $100m to every team last year and Forbes has the cardinals at $340m from baseball only revenue. That does not include ballpark village parking the apartments etc because Dewitt has them under a separate business. Claiming poverty for a franchise that has appreciated from 150m when purchased to 3.4b now is absurd. Dewitt is the problem.
Its like people on this forum only know one thing... and dont even read anything that anyone else writes. Top payroll teams are also the top revenue teams, and those are the only ones that are competitive. This is no longer MLB of 2005
Owners want more profit. It’s being run like a business be the small makers and like a fan by the big ones. The only fix is 100% revenue sharing and the top 10 markets will not give up the TV $
Youboughtit
Forum User
Posts: 4019
Joined: 06 Oct 2020 15:45 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by Youboughtit »

45s wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:08 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:01 pm Players would never agree to a cap so it’s a non starter. We just had the rangers and diamondbacks playing each other in the WS 2 seasons ago, not exactly WS regulars. My biggest complaint is teams that refuse to spend. We need a luxury tax system for low spenders similar to the one we have for high spenders. Maybe then teams will stop giving away solid players to the dodgers for minimal return to avoid paying them.
A salary floor or tax is inflationary…….and penalizes the followers of small market teams..
The floor is a percentage of cap. The cap will be over 300m and the lowest floor in professional sports is 80% so the As and the other teams will need to spend $200-$240m. How is that possible without full revenue sharing?
Youboughtit
Forum User
Posts: 4019
Joined: 06 Oct 2020 15:45 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by Youboughtit »

Alex Reyes Cy Young wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:11 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 08 Jul 2025 10:50 am RE:

TAMPA RAYS

:wink:
Exactly. You can compete with a low payroll that’s total [nonsense].
Compete for a playoff spot or WS? No one cares about the last WC spot. That is not a WS
Youboughtit
Forum User
Posts: 4019
Joined: 06 Oct 2020 15:45 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by Youboughtit »

desertrat23 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 16:18 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 16:00 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:15 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:01 pm Players would never agree to a cap so it’s a non starter. We just had the rangers and diamondbacks playing each other in the WS 2 seasons ago, not exactly WS regulars. My biggest complaint is teams that refuse to spend. We need a luxury tax system for low spenders similar to the one we have for high spenders. Maybe then teams will stop giving away solid players to the dodgers for minimal return to avoid paying them.
If the owners hang tough a cap will happen. They might lose an entire season but it will happen.
With the game increasing in popularity at all levels right now this would be the most short sighted thing the league could possibly do and it wouldn’t even save them money. It would just force poor teams to pay more than they can afford and for the rich teams to be more profitable than ever assuming the players get 50% of revenue. Won’t happen.
The poorest team can afford a lot more if they go with the NFL revenue sharing model.
Yep. Go convince the top 10 markets to cut their profit in half and all good
desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 1531
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by desertrat23 »

Youboughtit wrote: 08 Jul 2025 17:08 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 16:18 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 16:00 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:15 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:01 pm Players would never agree to a cap so it’s a non starter. We just had the rangers and diamondbacks playing each other in the WS 2 seasons ago, not exactly WS regulars. My biggest complaint is teams that refuse to spend. We need a luxury tax system for low spenders similar to the one we have for high spenders. Maybe then teams will stop giving away solid players to the dodgers for minimal return to avoid paying them.
If the owners hang tough a cap will happen. They might lose an entire season but it will happen.
With the game increasing in popularity at all levels right now this would be the most short sighted thing the league could possibly do and it wouldn’t even save them money. It would just force poor teams to pay more than they can afford and for the rich teams to be more profitable than ever assuming the players get 50% of revenue. Won’t happen.
The poorest team can afford a lot more if they go with the NFL revenue sharing model.
Yep. Go convince the top 10 markets to cut their profit in half and all good
I agree it's going to be tough. It will be Armageddon in baseball. No 2027 season. Maybe half a 2028 season. But if they don't fix it this time the sport will die.
45s
Forum User
Posts: 17081
Joined: 01 Mar 2022 20:15 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by 45s »

Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 16:04 pm
45s wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:08 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:01 pm Players would never agree to a cap so it’s a non starter. We just had the rangers and diamondbacks playing each other in the WS 2 seasons ago, not exactly WS regulars. My biggest complaint is teams that refuse to spend. We need a luxury tax system for low spenders similar to the one we have for high spenders. Maybe then teams will stop giving away solid players to the dodgers for minimal return to avoid paying them.
A salary floor or tax is inflationary…….and penalizes the followers of small market teams..
Every team gets over $110 million in revenue sharing. There’s no excuse for the Marlins to be spending $69 million this year. I’m not saying we should make the floor $200 million or something, just have them spend the money they receive in revenue sharing.
Ok…so you want Miami to spend 110 million…

Well no one wants to go there….so there’s no Kyle Tucker contract to get them there..

What to do…? Well, there is a broken down, old shortstop looking for a job….lets sign him for 20 million and we are there…

It just so happens that Masyn Wynn is up for arbitration that year….so his agent looks around the league for comparables…

Hey that bum in Miami is getting 20 million…….my guy is younger and better…as least twice as good as him…

The arbiter says….you are right …Masyn, congrats on your 40 million..

An overpaid guy in Miami….and an overpaid guy in Stl…

Too much money chasing too little talent….inflation…
desertrat23
Forum User
Posts: 1531
Joined: 28 May 2024 18:12 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by desertrat23 »

45s wrote: 08 Jul 2025 18:40 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 16:04 pm
45s wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:08 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:01 pm Players would never agree to a cap so it’s a non starter. We just had the rangers and diamondbacks playing each other in the WS 2 seasons ago, not exactly WS regulars. My biggest complaint is teams that refuse to spend. We need a luxury tax system for low spenders similar to the one we have for high spenders. Maybe then teams will stop giving away solid players to the dodgers for minimal return to avoid paying them.
A salary floor or tax is inflationary…….and penalizes the followers of small market teams..
Every team gets over $110 million in revenue sharing. There’s no excuse for the Marlins to be spending $69 million this year. I’m not saying we should make the floor $200 million or something, just have them spend the money they receive in revenue sharing.
Ok…so you want Miami to spend 110 million…

Well no one wants to go there….so there’s no Kyle Tucker contract to get them there..

What to do…? Well, there is a broken down, old shortstop looking for a job….lets sign him for 20 million and we are there…

It just so happens that Masyn Wynn is up for arbitration that year….so his agent looks around the league for comparables…

Hey that bum in Miami is getting 20 million…….my guy is younger and better…as least twice as good as him…

The arbiter says….you are right …Masyn, congrats on your 40 million..

An overpaid guy in Miami….and an overpaid guy in Stl…

Too much money chasing too little talent….inflation…
OK, so how do you fix it? (Note: if your answer is ‘you don’t,’ I think that’s a perfectly reasonable if sad answer.)
11WSChamps
Forum User
Posts: 3008
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by 11WSChamps »

Well actually it partly is on ownership. The horrible contracts,
Roster construction and of course leadership in the dugout.

Tha Cardinals know a work stoppage is coming after 2026 and they are banking on eventually benefitting from it.

So making any major money acquisitions isn't going to happen.

Even if you want to believe a work stoppage brings about a more even playing field the franchise is still woefully short on baseball smarts.
ForumPolice
Forum User
Posts: 428
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:14 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by ForumPolice »

I have never rooted for a sports League strike before but I'm anxiously awaiting MLB's. There needs to be some serious restructuring and if it takes 3 years of players sitting on their (bleep) because they love the status quo then so be it.

I definitely place plenty of blame on the owners. They're the dumb[ash] that negotiated into the mess they're in now so please don't think I'm defending them
woofy25
Forum User
Posts: 1354
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:44 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by woofy25 »

bretto12 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 14:51 pm The Dodger's make more in local TV money than the Cardinals do from all sources. And yes, a Salary cap is the issue. All a cap means is that the players will not all sign with the big market teams. They still get their money, but the locations may be Seattle or St.Louis.
I'm tired of watching the same teams go to the WS every year.
The last three WS had six different teams. The last four had seven different.
45s
Forum User
Posts: 17081
Joined: 01 Mar 2022 20:15 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by 45s »

desertrat23 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:56 pm
45s wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:21 pm
desertrat23 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:15 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:01 pm Players would never agree to a cap so it’s a non starter. We just had the rangers and diamondbacks playing each other in the WS 2 seasons ago, not exactly WS regulars. My biggest complaint is teams that refuse to spend. We need a luxury tax system for low spenders similar to the one we have for high spenders. Maybe then teams will stop giving away solid players to the dodgers for minimal return to avoid paying them.
If the owners hang tough a cap will happen. They might lose an entire season but it will happen.
They might agree to it……but delayed significantly
Very likely -- they'll have to solve contracts like Ohtani and Soto.
You could salary cap players that come into the league after a particular date.

Existing players would not be subject to the cap.

It might take 10 years for existing players to retire…but after that the cap would be fully in place..
45s
Forum User
Posts: 17081
Joined: 01 Mar 2022 20:15 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the owner

Post by 45s »

desertrat23 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 19:07 pm
45s wrote: 08 Jul 2025 18:40 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 16:04 pm
45s wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:08 pm
Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 15:01 pm Players would never agree to a cap so it’s a non starter. We just had the rangers and diamondbacks playing each other in the WS 2 seasons ago, not exactly WS regulars. My biggest complaint is teams that refuse to spend. We need a luxury tax system for low spenders similar to the one we have for high spenders. Maybe then teams will stop giving away solid players to the dodgers for minimal return to avoid paying them.
A salary floor or tax is inflationary…….and penalizes the followers of small market teams..
Every team gets over $110 million in revenue sharing. There’s no excuse for the Marlins to be spending $69 million this year. I’m not saying we should make the floor $200 million or something, just have them spend the money they receive in revenue sharing.
Ok…so you want Miami to spend 110 million…

Well no one wants to go there….so there’s no Kyle Tucker contract to get them there..

What to do…? Well, there is a broken down, old shortstop looking for a job….lets sign him for 20 million and we are there…

It just so happens that Masyn Wynn is up for arbitration that year….so his agent looks around the league for comparables…

Hey that bum in Miami is getting 20 million…….my guy is younger and better…as least twice as good as him…

The arbiter says….you are right …Masyn, congrats on your 40 million..

An overpaid guy in Miami….and an overpaid guy in Stl…

Too much money chasing too little talent….inflation…
OK, so how do you fix it? (Note: if your answer is ‘you don’t,’ I think that’s a perfectly reasonable if sad answer.)
Install a salary floor……but eliminate arbitration…go back to the days of players holding out and who blinks first.

Not a great solution…but an option…

It would also eliminate those uncomfortable arbitration hearings where the team has to beat up on their own player to win the case.
Clubmaker2
Forum User
Posts: 1715
Joined: 16 Apr 2021 16:53 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by Clubmaker2 »

If your second and third largest paid pitching contracts are tied up in a guy that was the worst starting pitcher in all of MLB last year and is the same guy this year, and the other tied up in a guy who failed so miserably he never held on to starting despite giving him a 4 year contract, it most definitely is on front office management and ownership. That is how awful some of MO's contracts are.
JuanAgosto
Forum User
Posts: 5841
Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by JuanAgosto »

Clubmaker2 wrote: 08 Jul 2025 21:49 pm If your second and third largest paid pitching contracts are tied up in a guy that was the worst starting pitcher in all of MLB last year and is the same guy this year, and the other tied up in a guy who failed so miserably he never held on to starting despite giving him a 4 year contract, it most definitely is on front office management and ownership. That is how awful some of MO's contracts are.
Mo's tenure is stacked with stupid contracts. Much more than savvy moves.
Bushiro
Forum User
Posts: 916
Joined: 07 Nov 2018 11:29 am

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by Bushiro »

Frontierman wrote: 08 Jul 2025 14:11 pm Long term it seems like MLB will combine local tv rights into one pool so they can sell them together rather than each team selling them. If that’s the case I’d assume tv revenue would be shared more evenly than it currently is which fixes the revenue disparity issue. Salary cap isn’t the answer.

In the meantime there’s no reason why the cardinals can’t spend in the 8-12 place payroll range which is enough to put together playoff teams regularly with a competent front office. That last part is what’s missing but that change is a month away.
Yes bad contracts have been given out....but 135 million for this franchise is a joke...
jbrach
Forum User
Posts: 604
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:33 pm

Re: Sorry it's not on the ownership

Post by jbrach »

yanks are a game and a half better than the cards FWIIW,brewers have a better record than the yanks and the same as the mets...
Post Reply