OT: Sharks at Flames
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: OT: Sharks at Flames
ENG. This one's over.
Re: OT: Sharks at Flames
Game over. Empty netter by Sharangovich. 5 - 2 Flames.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: 05 May 2020 14:17 pm
Re: OT: Sharks at Flames
I had already made plans for Tuesday night and it wouldn't be anywhere near as exciting had they already clinched. lol
Re: OT: Sharks at Flames
Something worth noting as edmonton won tonight. If edmonton beats la tomorrow and wins out, then the kings will be playing for seeding and home ice advantage over edmonton in the first round when they face the calgary flames for the final game. I know many people are expecting vegas and kings not to even try.
There also technically isnt no incentive for vegas. Theres a chance thaz game influences theirbfirst round opponent. Also finishing with more points than daklas stars would give them home ice advantage over stars if both made conference finals
There also technically isnt no incentive for vegas. Theres a chance thaz game influences theirbfirst round opponent. Also finishing with more points than daklas stars would give them home ice advantage over stars if both made conference finals
Re: OT: Sharks at Flames
I mean the time in which you think its best to pull the goalie to tie a game remains the same in every game doesn't it?Harold_Melvin wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025 21:19 pmCould you better define the word "that" in your post. I'm not being a smart (donkey), I just don't understand what you are saying.skilles wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025 21:09 pmI don't know why that would change the strategyHarold_Melvin wrote: ↑13 Apr 2025 20:55 pmThat's a good question if the Flames are down. But a loss in regulation is an elimination event. Opening the possibility of getting eliminated sooner than later via an empty net goal is IMO a bad plan.
Re: OT: Sharks at Flames
I couldn’t watch. I just checked in to see the score about every 45 min. At 2-2 I got a little hopeful but Calgary just seems like they cam win it out to 82 games
Discussed it with the blues players, not finishing it out better. That goal with 20 sec left-just another disappointment
Ok I keep quoting Yogi
It ain’t over til it’s over (which does not project to the ultimate winner)
Discussed it with the blues players, not finishing it out better. That goal with 20 sec left-just another disappointment
Ok I keep quoting Yogi
It ain’t over til it’s over (which does not project to the ultimate winner)
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: 15 Oct 2019 08:36 am
Re: OT: Sharks at Flames
It will suck if the Blues miss this playoffs.
It will suck only slightly less if they had to back into a wild card slot by losing their last four games.
They do control their own destiny.
Kick the front door open, boys.
Bring your best for one game.
It will suck only slightly less if they had to back into a wild card slot by losing their last four games.
They do control their own destiny.
Kick the front door open, boys.
Bring your best for one game.