STLtoday.com

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 09:01 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:56 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:51 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:35 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 05:46 am

Cranny wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 22:01 pm No comment.

Troll definition: A person who makes deliberately offensive or provocative online posts.

How about that AAA team, Red? And look at that little puppy dog troll who pops up every time I post. Ain’t he cute.

You bring it on yourself. This is a blatant attempt to fight with Red, and then, to insult another poster. Why do you do this.

Because I don’t like being attacked, dawg. Did you, in the military? Didn’t you counter attack when you were attacked?

But the thread was dead. You fired it up again. That’s the point. This is someone’s thread. There is a level of respect needed, and expected, reference personal engagements.

You’ve made your point 50 plus times. You’ve more than made ur point.

Thanks Sikes for trying to make this forum a better place, and btw, you DO make this forum a better place.

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 09:01 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:56 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:51 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:35 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 05:46 am

Cranny wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 22:01 pm No comment.

Troll definition: A person who makes deliberately offensive or provocative online posts.

How about that AAA team, Red? And look at that little puppy dog troll who pops up every time I post. Ain’t he cute.

You bring it on yourself. This is a blatant attempt to fight with Red, and then, to insult another poster. Why do you do this.

Because I don’t like being attacked, dawg. Did you, in the military? Didn’t you counter attack when you were attacked?

But the thread was dead. You fired it up again. That’s the point. This is someone’s thread. There is a level of respect needed, and expected, reference personal engagements.

You’ve made your point 50 plus times. You’ve more than made ur point.

Dawg - how’d you like a little puppy dog troll following you around after every time you post, no matter what you post.

And don’t tell me about military “personal problems”. When a SAM is fired at me I try to take out the SAM site. You’d do the same, my friend.

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:02 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 09:01 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:56 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:51 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:35 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 05:46 am

Cranny wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 22:01 pm No comment.

Troll definition: A person who makes deliberately offensive or provocative online posts.

How about that AAA team, Red? And look at that little puppy dog troll who pops up every time I post. Ain’t he cute.

You bring it on yourself. This is a blatant attempt to fight with Red, and then, to insult another poster. Why do you do this.

Because I don’t like being attacked, dawg. Did you, in the military? Didn’t you counter attack when you were attacked?

But the thread was dead. You fired it up again. That’s the point. This is someone’s thread. There is a level of respect needed, and expected, reference personal engagements.

You’ve made your point 50 plus times. You’ve more than made ur point.

Dawg - how’d you like a little puppy dog troll following you around after every time you post, no matter what you post.

And don’t tell me about military “personal problems”. When a SAM is fired at me I try to take out the SAM site. You’d do the same, my friend.

You are correct sir. I’d not like a person to bother me. But I also try to ensure I stay deeply embedded in neutrality To mitigate what- “ my alligator mouth gets my hummingbird assss into.”

As for the return of fire. Was it really a SAM or just a stray bullet shot over the bow? As for taking out the position, that’s a bit stretched reference this conversation .

When you repeatedly refer to someone as a puppy dog, you are doing exactly what you complain about. Instigating.

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:12 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:02 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 09:01 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:56 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:51 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:35 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 05:46 am

Cranny wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 22:01 pm No comment.

Troll definition: A person who makes deliberately offensive or provocative online posts.

How about that AAA team, Red? And look at that little puppy dog troll who pops up every time I post. Ain’t he cute.

You bring it on yourself. This is a blatant attempt to fight with Red, and then, to insult another poster. Why do you do this.

Because I don’t like being attacked, dawg. Did you, in the military? Didn’t you counter attack when you were attacked?

But the thread was dead. You fired it up again. That’s the point. This is someone’s thread. There is a level of respect needed, and expected, reference personal engagements.

You’ve made your point 50 plus times. You’ve more than made ur point.

Dawg - how’d you like a little puppy dog troll following you around after every time you post, no matter what you post.

And don’t tell me about military “personal problems”. When a SAM is fired at me I try to take out the SAM site. You’d do the same, my friend.

You are correct sir. I’d not like a person to bother me. But I also try to ensure I stay deeply embedded in neutrality To mitigate what- “ my alligator mouth gets my hummingbird assss into.”

As for the return of fire. Was it really a SAM or just a stray bullet shot over the bow? As for taking out the position, that’s a bit stretched reference this conversation .

When you repeatedly refer to someone as a puppy dog, you are doing exactly what you complain about. Instigating.

And you, sir, are taking the role of a moderator.
Which I don’t think is like you, and a role I don’t think you really want.

OldRed wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025 17:55 pm With trying to compete on a Major League level.

Follow-up 8 days later:

Are we watching a AAA team playing over their head against the Dodgers and Cubs (last 10 games 5 - 5) or are we watching an team who is better without Arenado and any super star player?

Question: Will they continue at .500 or fall below in the last in their last 43 games?

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:36 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:12 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:02 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 09:01 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:56 am

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:51 am

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 08:35 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 05:46 am

Cranny wrote: ↑10 Aug 2025 22:01 pm No comment.

Troll definition: A person who makes deliberately offensive or provocative online posts.

How about that AAA team, Red? And look at that little puppy dog troll who pops up every time I post. Ain’t he cute.

You bring it on yourself. This is a blatant attempt to fight with Red, and then, to insult another poster. Why do you do this.

Because I don’t like being attacked, dawg. Did you, in the military? Didn’t you counter attack when you were attacked?

But the thread was dead. You fired it up again. That’s the point. This is someone’s thread. There is a level of respect needed, and expected, reference personal engagements.

You’ve made your point 50 plus times. You’ve more than made ur point.

Dawg - how’d you like a little puppy dog troll following you around after every time you post, no matter what you post.

And don’t tell me about military “personal problems”. When a SAM is fired at me I try to take out the SAM site. You’d do the same, my friend.

You are correct sir. I’d not like a person to bother me. But I also try to ensure I stay deeply embedded in neutrality To mitigate what- “ my alligator mouth gets my hummingbird assss into.”

As for the return of fire. Was it really a SAM or just a stray bullet shot over the bow? As for taking out the position, that’s a bit stretched reference this conversation .

When you repeatedly refer to someone as a puppy dog, you are doing exactly what you complain about. Instigating.

And you, sir, are taking the role of a moderator.
Which I don’t think is like you, and a role I don’t think you really want.

Very well. You mistook our dialoge, and certainly its intent. I wish you well.

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:50 am

OldRed wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025 17:55 pm With trying to compete on a Major League level.

Follow-up 8 days later:

Are we watching a AAA team playing over their head against the Dodgers and Cubs (last 10 games 5 - 5) or are we watching an team who is better without Arenado and any super star player?

Question: Will they continue at .500 or fall below in the last in their last 43 games?

Good question. Nobody knows.

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:50 am

OldRed wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025 17:55 pm With trying to compete on a Major League level.

Follow-up 8 days later:

Are we watching a AAA team playing over their head against the Dodgers and Cubs (last 10 games 5 - 5) or are we watching an team who is better without Arenado and any super star player?

Question: Will they continue at .500 or fall below in the last in their last 43 games?

I was at the game yesterday in Section 148...nice crowd...lot of Cubbies fans...and a good game...talked to several fans during the game...when Mo-ran appeared on the screen during the ESPN interview the Cards fans booed and the Cubs fans laughed...he is a joke and has taken this once proud franchise with him...and the front office (donkey) kissers will soon have their feelings hurt...again!

LOL. Like a fish to water.

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:58 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:50 am

OldRed wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025 17:55 pm With trying to compete on a Major League level.

Follow-up 8 days later:

Are we watching a AAA team playing over their head against the Dodgers and Cubs (last 10 games 5 - 5) or are we watching an team who is better without Arenado and any super star player?

Question: Will they continue at .500 or fall below in the last in their last 43 games?

Good question. Nobody knows.

You took the bait . . . Didn't take you 2 minutes to follow behind me. At least your comment was decent.

Cranny, why does just about every thread you enter end in this manner??

Constantly chastising those who are relaying what they’ve seen with their own eyes…..but you telling them the opposite
And then you complaining someone is stalking and trolling you

Goldfan wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 12:44 pm Cranny, why does just about every thread you enter end in this manner??

Constantly chastising those who are relaying what they’ve seen with their own eyes…..but you telling them the opposite
And then you complaining someone is stalking and trolling you

Please put me on ignore, Goldfan. We’re simply at opposite ends of the spectrum on how we view the Cardinals. Thank you.

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 12:09 pm

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:58 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:50 am

OldRed wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025 17:55 pm With trying to compete on a Major League level.

Follow-up 8 days later:

Are we watching a AAA team playing over their head against the Dodgers and Cubs (last 10 games 5 - 5) or are we watching an team who is better without Arenado and any super star player?

Question: Will they continue at .500 or fall below in the last in their last 43 games?

Good question. Nobody knows.

You took the bait . . . Didn't take you 2 minutes to follow behind me. At least your comment was decent.

No bait. Just responded to your post like I do any post from any poster.

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 13:06 pm

Goldfan wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 12:44 pm Cranny, why does just about every thread you enter end in this manner??

Constantly chastising those who are relaying what they’ve seen with their own eyes…..but you telling them the opposite
And then you complaining someone is stalking and trolling you

Please put me on ignore, Goldfan. We’re simply at opposite ends of the spectrum on how we view the Cardinals. Thank you.

This is a stupid anonymous CARDINALS TALK forum…….not significant enough in any way shape or manner to put ANY poster on IGNORE or report to the forum police……we take ourselves WAY too seriously here about a game.
Apparently the end of the spectrum concerning the Cards which materialized has aligned with way more Goldfan then Cranny
Perhaps you should take off those Cards/BDW colored glasses and listen to posters who have been correct about the slow motion MO train wreck we’ve been watching these last few years.

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 13:08 pm

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 12:09 pm

Cranny wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:58 am

OldRed wrote: ↑11 Aug 2025 11:50 am

OldRed wrote: ↑03 Aug 2025 17:55 pm With trying to compete on a Major League level.

Follow-up 8 days later:

Are we watching a AAA team playing over their head against the Dodgers and Cubs (last 10 games 5 - 5) or are we watching an team who is better without Arenado and any super star player?

Question: Will they continue at .500 or fall below in the last in their last 43 games?

Good question. Nobody knows.

You took the bait . . . Didn't take you 2 minutes to follow behind me. At least your comment was decent.

No bait. Just responded to your post like I do any post from any poster.

I see you're still Filibustering anyone daring to hold a different opinion than you do regarding:

• the owner
• the inconsequential pobo we've had for years
• or anyone who thinks this team is on the outside looking in; where & when it matters most

Carry on, Captain Ahab. I hope you get your leg back.

I love these threads...a poster takes on numerous other posters, argues, childes. and keeps the thread going and then plays the victim. This is [fork]ing awesome! Please continue for my entertainment!