STLtoday.com

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:04 pm**

icon wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:51 pm I gotta admit. Can't blame fans for not showing up for this one. These games against the Pirates minus the ones with Skenes are snoozers.

Yeah, you gotta win them, but it's like playing a AAA team.

Are you talking about the Cards or Pirates? I guess true about both.

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:04 pm**

good job, Maton.

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:04 pm**

swatski wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:02 pm
scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:59 pm
Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pm
Joseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
the ump literally said the call on the field stands after saying there was no blocking
If you can challenge all aspects of the play you’d have to be a moron to not do so….oh wait.

I see. If you're going to challenge a play like that, do it that way. So Oli is a confirmed moron again.

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:05 pm**

Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pm
Joseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.

Ump said ‘ there is no blocking violation.. the. call on the field stands.. the runner is out !’
Verbstim from video tape

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:06 pm**

ramfandan wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:05 pm
Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pm
Joseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
Ump said ‘ there is no blocking violation.. the. call on the field stands.. the runner is out !’
Verbstim from video tape

Yep...

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:07 pm**

ramfandan wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:05 pm
Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pm
Joseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
Ump said ‘ there is no blocking violation.. the. call on the field stands.. the runner is out !’
Verbstim from video tape

My mistake. Interpreted that to mean he didn’t indicate whether Scott was tagged or got his hand in.

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:07 pm**

craviduce wrote: ↑05 May 2025 19:48 pm
craviduce wrote: ↑05 May 2025 19:46 pm loads them up....this is about to get rather ugly....

need a Timely DP
in my best Foghorn Leghorn voice : I say, I say, I say.... this Boy ^^^ is a genius

I say, son, that wuz a joke, son…..and a pretty timely one, too. See you tomorrow morning on “Tune in With Me.”

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:08 pm**

thetank2 wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:02 pm
Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pm
Joseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?

I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
From mlb q and a

What part of a close play will the umpire look for?

The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.

Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
I doubt it. Just some nonsense spewing from your mouth thinking you influence Cardinals fans.

Busted. That’s really my Goal in life. To influence cardinal fans.

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:12 pm**

that ate you up, KeBron

come on, ~~Barrero~~ VS2....drive in some more

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:15 pm**

craviduce wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:12 pm that ate you up, KeBron

come on, ~~Barrero~~ VS2....drive in some more

now, Barrero

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:15 pm**

Jeebus....you have to be kidding me.

2 RISP, no outs. 2 straight K's

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:18 pm**

PathetiKKK....3 K's with 2 RISP

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:18 pm**

craviduce wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:15 pm Jeebus....you have to be kidding me.

2 RISP, no outs. 2 straight K's

3 straight.

wasted opportunity

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:19 pm**

craviduce wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:15 pm Jeebus....you have to be kidding me.

2 RISP, no outs. 2 straight K's

Isn’t that the exact reason Baker is on the team? Lefty on the mound?

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:19 pm**

2nd and 3rd, no outs
no runs
guess they wanted Helsley to have a save opportunity

Posted: **05 May 2025 21:20 pm**

Noot slumping big time. Oli will have Winn batting LO again soon.

STLtoday.com

GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT

Re: GDT : Cards vs. Pirates (5/5) ~ 6:45pm CDT