STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1511925
No problem with Pops on that call. Ball was fairly deep..you have fastest player on 3rd… Cruz dies have strong arm which Warner knows but only a throw on the money possibly nails him. so you send the guy. Any 3rd base ciach eoilf send there.
From mlb q and aJoseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?
I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
Not sure that's Oli's call there. He gets advised by Descalso on that, who in turn gets info from somebody else reviewing video?
the ump literally said the call on the field stands after saying there was no blockingAbsolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pmFrom mlb q and aJoseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?
I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
What part of a close play will the umpire look for?
The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.
Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
Shhhh...let them blame Oli for the death of the popeicon wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:58 pmNot sure that's Oli's call there. He gets advised by Descalso on that, who in turn gets info from somebody else reviewing video?
He didn't kill the Pope?scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑05 May 2025 21:00 pmShhhh...let them blame Oli for the death of the popeicon wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:58 pmNot sure that's Oli's call there. He gets advised by Descalso on that, who in turn gets info from somebody else reviewing video?
If you can challenge all aspects of the play you’d have to be a moron to not do so….oh wait.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:59 pmthe ump literally said the call on the field stands after saying there was no blockingAbsolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pmFrom mlb q and aJoseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?
I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
What part of a close play will the umpire look for?
The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.
Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
I doubt it. Just some nonsense spewing from your mouth thinking you influence Cardinals fans.Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pmFrom mlb q and aJoseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?
I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
What part of a close play will the umpire look for?
The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.
Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
Not one to defend Oli,but, watched the replay of Oli asking for a review and it looked to me that he indicated he was challenging both calls.Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pmFrom mlb q and aJoseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?
I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
What part of a close play will the umpire look for?
The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.
Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
Not a fan of Oli, but he likely challenges what the video guy advises is the mostly likely to get overturned.Absolut wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:53 pmFrom mlb q and aJoseph-Magrane wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:44 pm You guys think that if he challenged catchers interference… And the review guy saw that he was safe regardless, that they wouldn’t call it safe because that’s not what he “challenged”?
I honestly don’t know, but that seems dumb
What part of a close play will the umpire look for?
The manager must specify what part of the play he's challenging. But he can challenge more than one aspect if he wants.
Ump said not blocking. Didn’t mention out or safe. I believe Oli cost us a run.
indeed poor AB by Nooticon wrote: ↑05 May 2025 20:58 pmNot sure that's Oli's call there. He gets advised by Descalso on that, who in turn gets info from somebody else reviewing video?