Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
JaseMan
- Forum User
- Posts: 362
- Joined: 12 Apr 2021 23:03 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Walker for leadoff! Go all the way on a rainy day. What do you got to say?
-
TheFantasyStud
- Forum User
- Posts: 324
- Joined: 27 May 2024 12:23 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Been saying it since opening day. Bat him 4th.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 3033
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
JW sure looked like a cleanup hitter yesterday.
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
-
zuck698
- Forum User
- Posts: 828
- Joined: 23 May 2024 18:44 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Hmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this "positively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
-
imetsatchelpaige
- Forum User
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
How does one "positively discuss his topic" when, like much of what he posts, it is specious and idiotic?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this "positively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
-
zuck698
- Forum User
- Posts: 828
- Joined: 23 May 2024 18:44 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
I would love to know that myself Satch! Maybe Cusecards will be along in a second to tell us how to respond to the O.P..imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:52 pmHow does one "positively discuss his topic" when, like much of what he posts, it is specious and idiotic?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this ositively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
-
Goldfan
- Forum User
- Posts: 14382
- Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Cuse and Paige are the self appointed Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Nanny, Hall Monitors for CT. They have superior intellect, just ask them, and ANY Cardinals baseball comment is of course of great importance and shall be criticized, henpecked, critiqued to their satisfaction. They seem to have a very unhealthy obsession with the mental well being of posters and they’re so well schooled in projecting and diagnosing mental maladies from simple statements……on an anonymous forum solely exclusively platformed about Cardinals Baseball.zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:54 pmI would love to know that myself Satch! Maybe Cusecards will be along in a second to tell us how to respond to the O.P..imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:52 pmHow does one "positively discuss his topic" when, like much of what he posts, it is specious and idiotic?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this ositively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.![]()
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Huh?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this "positively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
I responded to Banner who I assumed was “joking” so I “joked” in return.
Counsel you??
Ok my apologies.
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Ok FrancisGoldfan wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:02 pmCuse and Paige are the self appointed Psychologists, Psychiatrists, Nanny, Hall Monitors for CT. They have superior intellect, just ask them, and ANY Cardinals baseball comment is of course of great importance and shall be criticized, henpecked, critiqued to their satisfaction. They seem to have a very unhealthy obsession with the mental well being of posters and they’re so well schooled in projecting and diagnosing mental maladies from simple statements……on an anonymous forum solely exclusively platformed about Cardinals Baseball.zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:54 pmI would love to know that myself Satch! Maybe Cusecards will be along in a second to tell us how to respond to the O.P..imetsatchelpaige wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:52 pmHow does one "positively discuss his topic" when, like much of what he posts, it is specious and idiotic?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this ositively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.![]()
-
zuck698
- Forum User
- Posts: 828
- Joined: 23 May 2024 18:44 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:05 pmHuh?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this "positively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
I responded to Banner who I assumed was “joking” so I “joked” in return.
Counsel you??
Ok my apologies.
Post by Cusecards » 30 Mar 2026 13:26 pm
zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:28 pm
Shady wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:10 pm
Or does he need to keep building his resume' before being cast into that vital role?
Congrats! You have out did yourself. I didn't think you could post something dumber than your last post, but you have proven me wrong!
Ok....not trying to be a jerk as I have had run-arounds with said poster.
There is clearly something wrong at that end and I hope he can resolve those issues.
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
No, you responded to my post. Mine is bolded, yours is in red. Hopefully you can see why I would have thought you were responding to me, since I was the last poster and you replied to my comment. No big deal Cuse, either way.
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Ok sorry for the confusion.zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:17 pmRe: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:05 pmHuh?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this "positively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
I responded to Banner who I assumed was “joking” so I “joked” in return.
Counsel you??
Ok my apologies.
Post by Cusecards » 30 Mar 2026 13:26 pm
zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:28 pm
Shady wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:10 pm
Or does he need to keep building his resume' before being cast into that vital role?
Congrats! You have out did yourself. I didn't think you could post something dumber than your last post, but you have proven me wrong!
Ok....not trying to be a jerk as I have had run-arounds with said poster.
There is clearly something wrong at that end and I hope he can resolve those issues.
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
No, you responded to my post. Mine is bolded, yours is in red. Hopefully you can see why I would have thought you were responding to me, since I was the last poster and you replied to my comment. No big deal Cuse, either way.
We’re good! The OP(Shady) seems to have a long history with certain posters? And his threads can be confusing and repetitive.
I do not go back that far.
I try(but am NOT always successful) to stay with baseball talk. For the most part I do but I admittedly slip up at times which is on me.
Take care
Go Cards(hate the Mets!)
-
zuck698
- Forum User
- Posts: 828
- Joined: 23 May 2024 18:44 pm
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
All good Cuse. Go Cards!Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:27 pmOk sorry for the confusion.zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:17 pmRe: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:05 pmHuh?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this "positively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
I responded to Banner who I assumed was “joking” so I “joked” in return.
Counsel you??
Ok my apologies.
Post by Cusecards » 30 Mar 2026 13:26 pm
zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:28 pm
Shady wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:10 pm
Or does he need to keep building his resume' before being cast into that vital role?
Congrats! You have out did yourself. I didn't think you could post something dumber than your last post, but you have proven me wrong!
Ok....not trying to be a jerk as I have had run-arounds with said poster.
There is clearly something wrong at that end and I hope he can resolve those issues.
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
No, you responded to my post. Mine is bolded, yours is in red. Hopefully you can see why I would have thought you were responding to me, since I was the last poster and you replied to my comment. No big deal Cuse, either way.
We’re good! The OP(Shady) seems to have a long history with certain posters? And his threads can be confusing and repetitive.
I do not go back that far.
I try(but am NOT always successful) to stay with baseball talk. For the most part I do but I admittedly slip up at times which is on me.
Take care
Go Cards(hate the Mets!)
-
Cusecards
- Forum User
- Posts: 11801
- Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am
Re: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?
Absolutely...let’s win another series!zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:30 pmAll good Cuse. Go Cards!Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:27 pmOk sorry for the confusion.zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:17 pmRe: Will Walker be batting cleanup tonite ?Cusecards wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 16:05 pmHuh?zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 15:49 pmHmmm? Didn't you just counsel me on a previous page about staying on topic? Is it one of those things you where you don't have to practice what you preach? Not trying to be a "jerk" as you stated below, or is this "positively discussing the topic"?
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
I responded to Banner who I assumed was “joking” so I “joked” in return.
Counsel you??
Ok my apologies.
Post by Cusecards » 30 Mar 2026 13:26 pm
zuck698 wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:28 pm
Shady wrote: ↑30 Mar 2026 12:10 pm
Or does he need to keep building his resume' before being cast into that vital role?
Congrats! You have out did yourself. I didn't think you could post something dumber than your last post, but you have proven me wrong!
Ok....not trying to be a jerk as I have had run-arounds with said poster.
There is clearly something wrong at that end and I hope he can resolve those issues.
In the meantime.....we should all probably ignore the posts unless you genuinely want to positively discuss his topic.
No, you responded to my post. Mine is bolded, yours is in red. Hopefully you can see why I would have thought you were responding to me, since I was the last poster and you replied to my comment. No big deal Cuse, either way.
We’re good! The OP(Shady) seems to have a long history with certain posters? And his threads can be confusing and repetitive.
I do not go back that far.
I try(but am NOT always successful) to stay with baseball talk. For the most part I do but I admittedly slip up at times which is on me.
Take care
Go Cards(hate the Mets!)