Page 2 of 2
Re: This might be a better MOTO than what the Cardinals currently have going
Posted: 14 Feb 2026 06:54 am
by HorseTrader
Shady wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026 18:03 pm
3) Burleson, 4) Herrera 5) Castellanos. At least to start the season. The need is there and the price is right to give Castellanos a chance. If it doesn't work out. Cut him. He might just become a decent trade piece at the trade deadline.
Stupid idea yesterday and still is today.
Re: This might be a better MOTO than what the Cardinals currently have going
Posted: 14 Feb 2026 07:47 am
by earp
NO!
Bad enough now
Re: This might be a better MOTO than what the Cardinals currently have going
Posted: 14 Feb 2026 08:18 am
by sikeston bulldog2
earp wrote: ↑14 Feb 2026 07:47 am
NO!
Bad enough now
Stop Right There! I gotta know right now.
Re: This might be a better MOTO than what the Cardinals currently have going
Posted: 14 Feb 2026 09:49 am
by Shady
JackClark wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026 21:25 pm
I think it’s a great idea to sign him. It’s stabilizes the lineup and if he does well, you flip him before the deadline for a prospect or two. If he sucks, you cut him. It buys you time for Noot to be 100% and for Baez to get AAA at bats.
You have some common sense. But it's probably a moot issue. It looks like the Padres have signed Castellanos."Castellanos will earn $780K on the contract, which is the MLB minimum salary for the 2026 season". Castellanos would have been a bargain for the Cardinals for the reasons you pointed out.
Re: This might be a better MOTO than what the Cardinals currently have going
Posted: 14 Feb 2026 12:42 pm
by Adam2
Shady wrote: ↑14 Feb 2026 09:49 am
JackClark wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026 21:25 pm
I think it’s a great idea to sign him. It’s stabilizes the lineup and if he does well, you flip him before the deadline for a prospect or two. If he sucks, you cut him. It buys you time for Noot to be 100% and for Baez to get AAA at bats.
You have some common sense. But it's probably a moot issue. It looks like the Padres have signed Castellanos."Castellanos will earn $780K on the contract, which is the MLB minimum salary for the 2026 season". Castellanos would have been a bargain for the Cardinals for the reasons you pointed out.
Even though hes signed, how have you not seen how bad hes been? He had 17 hr in Philly. That means he'd have about 12 playing for stl. And hes a cancer in the clubhouse, proven in Detroit and Philly. How are you not grasping this?
Oh, and hes the worst outfielder in all of mlb
Re: This might be a better MOTO than what the Cardinals currently have going
Posted: 14 Feb 2026 18:02 pm
by Alex Reyes Cy Young
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/mlb/ni ... e0024&ei=8
He's a Padre!
No thanks to the worse defensive player in the MLBs.
Who thinks this garbage up?
Re: This might be a better MOTO than what the Cardinals currently have going
Posted: 14 Feb 2026 18:03 pm
by Alex Reyes Cy Young
Adam2 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2026 12:42 pm
Shady wrote: ↑14 Feb 2026 09:49 am
JackClark wrote: ↑13 Feb 2026 21:25 pm
I think it’s a great idea to sign him. It’s stabilizes the lineup and if he does well, you flip him before the deadline for a prospect or two. If he sucks, you cut him. It buys you time for Noot to be 100% and for Baez to get AAA at bats.
You have some common sense. But it's probably a moot issue. It looks like the Padres have signed Castellanos."Castellanos will earn $780K on the contract, which is the MLB minimum salary for the 2026 season". Castellanos would have been a bargain for the Cardinals for the reasons you pointed out.
Even though hes signed, how have you not seen how bad hes been? He had 17 hr in Philly. That means he'd have about 12 playing for stl. And hes a cancer in the clubhouse, proven in Detroit and Philly. How are you not grasping this?
Oh, and hes the worst outfielder in all of mlb
Really stupid to want him on this team. Makes 0 sense.