Re: Why the hate on Mikolas
Posted: 09 Feb 2026 16:39 pm
I don't hate him. He had a couple good years for the Cards. I just think he is done.
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1520293
ThisBasil Shabazz wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 15:05 pm For a franchise that prides itself on “The Cardinal Way,” the goofy, sarcastic antics from Miles Mikolas and Adam Wainwright over the past couple of seasons landed the wrong way—and at the wrong time.
Veteran players set the temperature in the room. When leaders treat losing seasons with sarcasm, jokey bravado, or a “lighten up” attitude, it sends a message—whether intended or not—that standards have slipped. The Cardinals weren’t a young team learning how to lose; they were an experienced roster actively underperforming. That’s exactly when seriousness, accountability, and urgency should be loudest from the top.
Adam Wainwright earned immense respect over his career, but leadership isn’t about résumé—it’s about awareness. When a team is spiraling, fans are frustrated, and younger players are looking for cues, public goofiness can feel dismissive. It blurs the line between confidence and complacency. Instead of projecting resolve, it came across as deflection.
Miles Mikolas’ sarcastic edge may play well when the team is winning, but during prolonged struggles, it reads as tone-deaf. Leaders don’t need to be humorless, but they do need to read the room. When performance doesn’t match attitude, culture erodes.
The Cardinals’ identity has always been about professionalism, quiet confidence, and letting results speak. When veterans stray from that—especially in public—it signals a breakdown in leadership. Culture isn’t what you say it is; it’s what you tolerate and what you model.
And for a franchise built on tradition and accountability, those moments mattered more than they probably realized.
You also don’t like Bloom, and think Oquendo is worthless as a coach.
Mo's rationale, which was always absurd is that if we didn't sign him then, his price would go up. Yes, if he had anything close to his 2018, his price would go up, but I'd have rather had them pay a bit more for a more proven pitcher than to risk him washing out of the league again, while tying up the payroll and preventing other moves.Adam2 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 14:04 pmat this point the only reason he will get signed (and i think he will in spring training due to an unexpected injury) is his innings. But i think most people don't like him because MO extended him when clearly he wasn't deserving of any sort of extension, he had become a BP pitcher. So i guess maybe partially number 2 on your list alsoRichieRichSTL wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 13:53 pmI'm speaking more of his body of work. His overall body of work is mediocre. But, yeah, I agree he has trended lucky to be a fifth arm in recent years.Adam2 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 13:48 pmIf he was good, trash talking isn't an issue. and you say his level of "mediocracy". He wasn't mediocre. This past year he was one of the worst qualifying pitchers in mlb baseballRichieRichSTL wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 13:45 pm Mikolas was never going to return. He simply didn't bring enough to the table to justify the distracton/controversy. But, why were many fans ready and eager to push him aside?
Choices
---------
1) He was too cocky for his level of mediocracy. Dizzy Dean, “It ain't bragging if you can do it”. Well, he didn't bring it enough to justify..
2) He was the teacher's (MO's), pet.
3) He deferred blame for his failures and minimzed them.
4) In an interview, he indirectly dogged Waino.
5) He trashed talked and didn't bring results to back it up.
The thing is he'd been bad since 2023. It wasn't just 2025. He isn't being singled out for that. It was the attitude that he carried, specifically point 3.Carp4Cy wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 14:09 pmone of the worst? Glass half empty eh? Of our starting 5 on opening day, he was only 3rd worst. And 3rd best. He even had a positive WAR.Adam2 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 13:48 pmIf he was good, trash talking isn't an issue. and you say his level of "mediocracy". He wasn't mediocre. This past year he was one of the worst qualifying pitchers in mlb baseballRichieRichSTL wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 13:45 pm Mikolas was never going to return. He simply didn't bring enough to the table to justify the distracton/controversy. But, why were many fans ready and eager to push him aside?
Choices
---------
1) He was too cocky for his level of mediocracy. Dizzy Dean, “It ain't bragging if you can do it”. Well, he didn't bring it enough to justify..
2) He was the teacher's (MO's), pet.
3) He deferred blame for his failures and minimzed them.
4) In an interview, he indirectly dogged Waino.
5) He trashed talked and didn't bring results to back it up.
FWIW, his ending ERA was only .60 pts off of Gray and Libby, and .40 off of McGreevy. That's within a normal year to year variance.
Our team as a whole was bad, but he doesn't deserve to be singled out as the proximate cause.
All players are responsible and should set the best tone. I agree. When however, you have been part of a championship run like he had and had the distinguished career he had, you are more forgiving of it. Mikolas came in, hadn't really proved his value to the franchise and to the fans, and did his antics here.Basil Shabazz wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 15:05 pm For a franchise that prides itself on “The Cardinal Way,” the goofy, sarcastic antics from Miles Mikolas and Adam Wainwright over the past couple of seasons landed the wrong way—and at the wrong time.
Veteran players set the temperature in the room. When leaders treat losing seasons with sarcasm, jokey bravado, or a “lighten up” attitude, it sends a message—whether intended or not—that standards have slipped. The Cardinals weren’t a young team learning how to lose; they were an experienced roster actively underperforming. That’s exactly when seriousness, accountability, and urgency should be loudest from the top.
Adam Wainwright earned immense respect over his career, but leadership isn’t about résumé—it’s about awareness. When a team is spiraling, fans are frustrated, and younger players are looking for cues, public goofiness can feel dismissive. It blurs the line between confidence and complacency. Instead of projecting resolve, it came across as deflection.
Miles Mikolas’ sarcastic edge may play well when the team is winning, but during prolonged struggles, it reads as tone-deaf. Leaders don’t need to be humorless, but they do need to read the room. When performance doesn’t match attitude, culture erodes.
The Cardinals’ identity has always been about professionalism, quiet confidence, and letting results speak. When veterans stray from that—especially in public—it signals a breakdown in leadership. Culture isn’t what you say it is; it’s what you tolerate and what you model.
And for a franchise built on tradition and accountability, those moments mattered more than they probably realized.
Agreed. MO, needing to be in control and not wanting to be overshadowed by the manager, got 3 managers whose authority would not eclipse his. The only manager whom actually pulled his weight here, was Shildt and apparently, his 'intensity' was too much for many. So, ultimately it falls on MO.zuck698 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 17:05 pmThisBasil Shabazz wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 15:05 pm For a franchise that prides itself on “The Cardinal Way,” the goofy, sarcastic antics from Miles Mikolas and Adam Wainwright over the past couple of seasons landed the wrong way—and at the wrong time.
Veteran players set the temperature in the room. When leaders treat losing seasons with sarcasm, jokey bravado, or a “lighten up” attitude, it sends a message—whether intended or not—that standards have slipped. The Cardinals weren’t a young team learning how to lose; they were an experienced roster actively underperforming. That’s exactly when seriousness, accountability, and urgency should be loudest from the top.
Adam Wainwright earned immense respect over his career, but leadership isn’t about résumé—it’s about awareness. When a team is spiraling, fans are frustrated, and younger players are looking for cues, public goofiness can feel dismissive. It blurs the line between confidence and complacency. Instead of projecting resolve, it came across as deflection.
Miles Mikolas’ sarcastic edge may play well when the team is winning, but during prolonged struggles, it reads as tone-deaf. Leaders don’t need to be humorless, but they do need to read the room. When performance doesn’t match attitude, culture erodes.
The Cardinals’ identity has always been about professionalism, quiet confidence, and letting results speak. When veterans stray from that—especially in public—it signals a breakdown in leadership. Culture isn’t what you say it is; it’s what you tolerate and what you model.
And for a franchise built on tradition and accountability, those moments mattered more than they probably realized.100% Who here doesn't miss the LaRussa days? There was no smiling and goofing off in the dugout during his tenure. His teams, love or hate the man, played with an edge. Now we have the Oliver, who can be seen hamming it up with his players, while losing 9-0 in the 8th inning. Just sad how the once proud franchise has eroded to the point it is now. Hopefully Bloom can restore some of this tradition in the future, but one thing for certain, he will not do it with Oliver at the helm. Hopefully Ollie Ball will be over when we start looking like we may be ready to compete again.
All of the above. Also, I can't stand that stupid porn mustache. He looks like an idiot and often acted like one to boot.RichieRichSTL wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 13:45 pm Mikolas was never going to return. He simply didn't bring enough to the table to justify the distracton/controversy. But, why were many fans ready and eager to push him aside?
Choices
---------
1) He was too cocky for his level of mediocracy. Dizzy Dean, “It ain't bragging if you can do it”. Well, he didn't bring it enough to justify..
2) He was the teacher's (MO's), pet.
3) He deferred blame for his failures and minimzed them.
4) In an interview, he indirectly dogged Waino.
5) He trashed talked and didn't bring results to back it up.
I disagree, he was serviceable in 2023. But, unfortunately, his extension played out in 2024/2025. So, by 2024, he is perceived as a fading pitcher whom significant payroll was tied up on.WaltsSuccessor wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 15:40 pmIt's just like Matt Carpenter. If he doesn't get that last extension, he leaves the organization with an entirely different taste in everyone's mouth.rockondlouie wrote: ↑09 Feb 2026 14:30 pm I'll admit it, glad to see him gone.
I was sick of him and his stupid act (re: hamburger phone, ect...).
Never should've got that last extension.
Good riddance
Miles was fantastic in his first year with us in 2018 then between solid and good in 2019 (hurt for a couple years) and 2022-23. He's only been terrible the past two seasons.