I prefer a package of River Ryan and Mike Sirota from LA. The pitcher and hitter return people mention.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:26 pmYes, someone will.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:24 pmAgree with this, and someone will pay that.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
That said, I would prefer going hard after Pages in LA.
MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2185
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
-
CrownRoyalCaramel
- Forum User
- Posts: 125
- Joined: 26 Apr 2024 13:58 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
You may be the dumbest poster I have seen here and that is REALLY saying something.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Mo overvalued our talent for the last ten years. Some folks around here have caught the Mo bug. They are now doing it to.CrownRoyalCaramel wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 22:32 pm
You may be the dumbest poster I have seen here and that is REALLY saying something.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
If the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14240
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Why.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Bc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14240
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Nice response. You make good points. If the cba was not looming, would your model change.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:51 amBc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
-
Talkin' Baseball
- Forum User
- Posts: 2185
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Maybe some. If the CBA wasn't looming there might still be a reasonable market for Donovan next offseason if the Cardinals wanted to pursue that. However, if teams suspect they might play a shortened schedule, or not at all, there is no way they are parting with any young player of significance. As far a moving him at the trade deadline next year, will there be a trade deadline next year? If you have a significant player to move, now is the time.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 05:07 amNice response. You make good points. If the cba was not looming, would your model change.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:51 amBc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
-
sikeston bulldog2
- Forum User
- Posts: 14240
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Roger.Talkin' Baseball wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 08:50 amMaybe some. If the CBA wasn't looming there might still be a reasonable market for Donovan next offseason if the Cardinals wanted to pursue that. However, if teams suspect they might play a shortened schedule, or not at all, there is no way they are parting with any young player of significance. As far a moving him at the trade deadline next year, will there be a trade deadline next year? If you have a significant player to move, now is the time.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 05:07 amNice response. You make good points. If the cba was not looming, would your model change.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:51 amBc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Incorrect.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
Why trade 2 years of Donvan for just one prospect who may provide zero quality MLB seasons in return?
That achieves nothing.
The CORRCET BASEBALL DECISION is to extend Donovan - but if the player rejects the extension or Bloom is simply incorrectly dead set on dealing him now, the return MUST include one young player who has already shown some level at success at the MLB level and a 2nd prospect piece.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
You are assuming Bloom is willing to throw away the 2026 season and possibly 2027 as well.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:51 amBc the Cardinals are already conceding they’re not contending in 2026. Nobody has any idea what happens in 2027 with the cba, and the cardinals probably aren’t competing for a ws then either. The longer you keep him the less value he has and the greater the chance he just walks away after his contract. Why is that a better alternative?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:47 amWhy.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
That is a false assumption on your part.
It would be incredibly damaging to an already deeply wounded franchise.
Nieth Bloom nor DeWitt are quite that stupid.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
I agree. Bloom should not surrender the next two years of a player who plays multiple positions well and gives 100% effort every game. Donovan makes a very low salary now, and should be offered a solid extension for 2/3 years. If he does not accept it, trade him but only if the return is exceptional. Apparently there are many teams interested, so there is no reason to not take advantage of the situation.Melville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 08:54 amIncorrect.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
Why trade 2 years of Donvan for just one prospect who may provide zero quality MLB seasons in return?
That achieves nothing.
The CORRCET BASEBALL DECISION is to extend Donovan - but if the player rejects the extension or Bloom is simply incorrectly dead set on dealing him now, the return MUST include one young player who has already shown some level at success at the MLB level and a 2nd prospect piece.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 6852
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
lol you also said the correct baseball decision was to extend helsley for 5 yearsMelville wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 08:54 amIncorrect.woofy25 wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 04:45 amIf the Cardinals are not extending him, then he has to get traded for the best return possible, including if it’s only one top prospect.Melville wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 21:22 pmHe is a good - not great player.
You are right about that.
But if STL cannot obtain at least 2 quality players in return, there is zero logic in trading him at all.
Stupid to trade one good player for just one prospect who may or may not ever become one himself.
Why trade 2 years of Donvan for just one prospect who may provide zero quality MLB seasons in return?
That achieves nothing.
The CORRCET BASEBALL DECISION is to extend Donovan - but if the player rejects the extension or Bloom is simply incorrectly dead set on dealing him now, the return MUST include one young player who has already shown some level at success at the MLB level and a 2nd prospect piece.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
And you are an "Add foe". Good riddance.CrownRoyalCaramel wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 22:32 pm
You may be the dumbest poster I have seen here and that is REALLY saying something.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
Shady wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025 11:00 amAnd you are an "Add foe". Good riddance.CrownRoyalCaramel wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 22:32 pm
You may be the dumbest poster I have seen here and that is REALLY saying something.
Re: MLB Live talking about Donnie to Mariners
It comes down to how many teams are interested in pursuing Donovan. I saw it may be as many as half the MLB teams.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 22:53 pmMo overvalued our talent for the last ten years. Some folks around here have caught the Mo bug. They are now doing it to.CrownRoyalCaramel wrote: ↑13 Dec 2025 22:32 pm
You may be the dumbest poster I have seen here and that is REALLY saying something.
Last edited by Shady on 14 Dec 2025 11:15 am, edited 2 times in total.