Page 2 of 6

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
by ScotchMIrish
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:02 am
by ecleme22
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:03 am
by ScotchMIrish
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:50 am

Context.

A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.

Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
Arenado will not make $300 million.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:04 am
by ScotchMIrish
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:02 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
You knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:18 am
by BrockFloodMaris
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
As has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:22 am
by ecleme22
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:04 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:02 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
You knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?
No, every player you mentioned can be traded and are independent of each other. They won't trade X player because they can't trade Y player.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:23 am
by ecleme22
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:03 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:50 am

Context.

A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.

Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
Arenado will not make $300 million.
His projected earnings total 289mil.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 11:28 am
by Ozziesfan41
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
The only reason his choices were limited was because he had to put David price into the trade

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 12:18 pm
by HorseTrader
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
I think most of us knew in August or September that Arenado, Gray and Willie would be on the trading. I'd also say that most of us knew that the trades could include Donovan, Noot, Burly, Gorman and maybe a catcher. I'm sorry if you didn't, I think most of those names were all talked about on most of the second half of the season.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 12:33 pm
by Cusecards
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:18 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
As has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.
+1
For the record....when I was working I would have gladly accepted my company offering to swap me to a competitor in exchange for making millions of $$.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 12:56 pm
by ScotchMIrish
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:18 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
As has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.
Alexander Graham Bell filed a patent for a telephone in 1876. Why not use that? Strange way to do business.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 12:59 pm
by ScotchMIrish
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:22 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:04 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:02 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
You knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?
No, every player you mentioned can be traded and are independent of each other. They won't trade X player because they can't trade Y player.
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”[/url]

Either the reporter is lying or Bloom intends to do exactly that.

[url=https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/st-louis-cardinals]

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 13:01 pm
by ScotchMIrish
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:23 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:03 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:50 am

Context.

A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.

Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
Arenado will not make $300 million.
His projected earnings total 289mil.
He has one year left @ $26 million. Where do you get $289 million?

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 13:04 pm
by ScotchMIrish
Ozziesfan41 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:28 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
The only reason his choices were limited was because he had to put David price into the trade
Now that he has told everybody exactly who he intends to trade are they going to try to bundle Donovan with Arenado and give us little in return?

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 13:06 pm
by ScotchMIrish
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 12:18 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
I think most of us knew in August or September that Arenado, Gray and Willie would be on the trading. I'd also say that most of us knew that the trades could include Donovan, Noot, Burly, Gorman and maybe a catcher. I'm sorry if you didn't, I think most of those names were all talked about on most of the second half of the season.
You knew in August they were going to trade Burleson too? You have a vivid imagination.

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Posted: 30 Nov 2025 13:25 pm
by renostl
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
When rumors were floating about Hernandez and the tensions with upper management the writing
on the wall was there. Look at the accomplishments of Hernandez were in his 20's for a couple minimal
level pitchers. Keith was a large part of both StL and NYM. Templeton went crazy flipped off
the crowd changed his career in a moment.

Bloom never has said he was giving guys away. There is still a price and demand for each player is what sets
that price. Cards don't have to make any more trades and would survive fine. They Gray trade shows this.
It was done very early. Sure the Cards threw money in but the player was still wanted to pitch
not because he had a coupon. IF the contract was $25/per instead of drastically deferred or backloaded
money wouldn't have been a issue.