Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 4341
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ecleme22 »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:50 am

Context.

A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.

Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
Arenado will not make $300 million.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:02 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
You knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?
BrockFloodMaris
Forum User
Posts: 2660
Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by BrockFloodMaris »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
As has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 4341
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ecleme22 »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:04 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:02 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
You knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?
No, every player you mentioned can be traded and are independent of each other. They won't trade X player because they can't trade Y player.
ecleme22
Forum User
Posts: 4341
Joined: 23 May 2024 21:17 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ecleme22 »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:03 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:50 am

Context.

A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.

Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
Arenado will not make $300 million.
His projected earnings total 289mil.
Ozziesfan41
Forum User
Posts: 6818
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by Ozziesfan41 »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
The only reason his choices were limited was because he had to put David price into the trade
HorseTrader
Forum User
Posts: 2421
Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by HorseTrader »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
I think most of us knew in August or September that Arenado, Gray and Willie would be on the trading. I'd also say that most of us knew that the trades could include Donovan, Noot, Burly, Gorman and maybe a catcher. I'm sorry if you didn't, I think most of those names were all talked about on most of the second half of the season.
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10832
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by Cusecards »

BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:18 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
As has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.
+1
For the record....when I was working I would have gladly accepted my company offering to swap me to a competitor in exchange for making millions of $$.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:18 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
As has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.
Alexander Graham Bell filed a patent for a telephone in 1876. Why not use that? Strange way to do business.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:22 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:04 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:02 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?
You knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?
No, every player you mentioned can be traded and are independent of each other. They won't trade X player because they can't trade Y player.
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”[/url]

Either the reporter is lying or Bloom intends to do exactly that.

[url=https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/st-louis-cardinals]
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:23 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:03 am
ecleme22 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:50 am

Context.

A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.

Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
Arenado will not make $300 million.
His projected earnings total 289mil.
He has one year left @ $26 million. Where do you get $289 million?
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

Ozziesfan41 wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:28 am
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 07:58 am
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 30 Nov 2025 06:56 am
I seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.
Why make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?

As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”

Why broadcast all of this?
The only reason his choices were limited was because he had to put David price into the trade
Now that he has told everybody exactly who he intends to trade are they going to try to bundle Donovan with Arenado and give us little in return?
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 1522
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by ScotchMIrish »

HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 12:18 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
I think most of us knew in August or September that Arenado, Gray and Willie would be on the trading. I'd also say that most of us knew that the trades could include Donovan, Noot, Burly, Gorman and maybe a catcher. I'm sorry if you didn't, I think most of those names were all talked about on most of the second half of the season.
You knew in August they were going to trade Burleson too? You have a vivid imagination.
renostl
Forum User
Posts: 3171
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:40 pm

Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?

Post by renostl »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 30 Nov 2025 11:01 am
HorseTrader wrote: 30 Nov 2025 09:18 am
Everyone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.
That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.
When rumors were floating about Hernandez and the tensions with upper management the writing
on the wall was there. Look at the accomplishments of Hernandez were in his 20's for a couple minimal
level pitchers. Keith was a large part of both StL and NYM. Templeton went crazy flipped off
the crowd changed his career in a moment.

Bloom never has said he was giving guys away. There is still a price and demand for each player is what sets
that price. Cards don't have to make any more trades and would survive fine. They Gray trade shows this.
It was done very early. Sure the Cards threw money in but the player was still wanted to pitch
not because he had a coupon. IF the contract was $25/per instead of drastically deferred or backloaded
money wouldn't have been a issue.
Post Reply