That is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
What do you mean? Can you elaborate?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:01 amThat is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
Arenado will not make $300 million.ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:50 amScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Context.
A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.
Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
You knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:02 amWhat do you mean? Can you elaborate?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:01 amThat is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
-
BrockFloodMaris
- Forum User
- Posts: 2660
- Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
As has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 07:58 amWhy make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:56 amI seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”
Why broadcast all of this?
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
No, every player you mentioned can be traded and are independent of each other. They won't trade X player because they can't trade Y player.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:04 amYou knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:02 amWhat do you mean? Can you elaborate?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:01 amThat is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
His projected earnings total 289mil.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:03 amArenado will not make $300 million.ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:50 amScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Context.
A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.
Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
-
Ozziesfan41
- Forum User
- Posts: 6818
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:01 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
The only reason his choices were limited was because he had to put David price into the tradeScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 07:58 amWhy make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:56 amI seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”
Why broadcast all of this?
-
HorseTrader
- Forum User
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: 18 Apr 2020 13:40 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
I think most of us knew in August or September that Arenado, Gray and Willie would be on the trading. I'd also say that most of us knew that the trades could include Donovan, Noot, Burly, Gorman and maybe a catcher. I'm sorry if you didn't, I think most of those names were all talked about on most of the second half of the season.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:01 amThat is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
+1BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:18 amAs has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 07:58 amWhy make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:56 amI seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”
Why broadcast all of this?
For the record....when I was working I would have gladly accepted my company offering to swap me to a competitor in exchange for making millions of $$.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
Alexander Graham Bell filed a patent for a telephone in 1876. Why not use that? Strange way to do business.BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:18 amAs has been posted in this thread, we are in the offseason. This is the business side of baseball. The players play their hands to their own benefit. Why shouldn't the POBOs? Why not let all his POBO cronies know what his intentions are? No one is getting a secret peak at Bloom's intentions. The playing field is level.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 07:58 amWhy make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:56 amI seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”
Why broadcast all of this?
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”[/url]ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:22 amNo, every player you mentioned can be traded and are independent of each other. They won't trade X player because they can't trade Y player.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:04 amYou knew in August we were trying to trade Contreras and Donovan - if we can't make a deal for Donovan we will try to trade Nootbar or Gorman?ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:02 amWhat do you mean? Can you elaborate?ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:01 amThat is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Either the reporter is lying or Bloom intends to do exactly that.
[url=https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/st-louis-cardinals]
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
He has one year left @ $26 million. Where do you get $289 million?ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:23 amHis projected earnings total 289mil.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:03 amArenado will not make $300 million.ecleme22 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:50 amScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Context.
A rebuilding team is obviously trading players, and it’s not personal.
Arenado will make about 300mil. If Bloom wants to openly say he’s shopping Arenado, I think ol’ Nolan will be okay.
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
Now that he has told everybody exactly who he intends to trade are they going to try to bundle Donovan with Arenado and give us little in return?Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:28 amThe only reason his choices were limited was because he had to put David price into the tradeScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 07:58 amWhy make it public? Is Bloom seeking attention? HIs excuse for not getting full value for Betts was the owner publicly said to trade Betts which limited his options. Isn't he doing the same thing now by making all this public?BrockFloodMaris wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:56 amI seriously doubt that Bloom is saying anything publicly that he hasn’t already discussed with the player in question. He even says so in his public remarks, especially with regard to Sonny, Nado and WC, since they have NTCs.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
As The Athletic’s Katie Woo frames the situation, if the Cards can’t find the big return they want for Donovan, the team “will pivot to moving at least one of” Lars Nootbaar or Nolan Gorman. In another piece from Woo, Will Sammon, and Ken Rosenthal, Alec Burleson is another player the Cardinals won’t move “unless…blown away by an offer.”
Why broadcast all of this?
-
ScotchMIrish
- Forum User
- Posts: 1522
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
You knew in August they were going to trade Burleson too? You have a vivid imagination.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 12:18 pmI think most of us knew in August or September that Arenado, Gray and Willie would be on the trading. I'd also say that most of us knew that the trades could include Donovan, Noot, Burly, Gorman and maybe a catcher. I'm sorry if you didn't, I think most of those names were all talked about on most of the second half of the season.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:01 amThat is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
Re: Is there a downside of Bloom going public with his desire to trade certain players?
When rumors were floating about Hernandez and the tensions with upper management the writingScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 11:01 amThat is not true. Gray and Arenado yes. Not the others.HorseTrader wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 09:18 amEveryone who has any interest in baseball knew in August what the plan would be, that everyone includes the players. So having it talked about really doesn't change anything from their side.ScotchMIrish wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025 06:22 am The main downsides of an MLB team publicly shopping a player are that it can severely damage the player's morale and performance, and it can decrease the player's trade value. This public "shopping" signals a lack of interest to the player and the rest of the league, which can lead to the player becoming disgruntled and may make other teams less willing to offer a high price in a trade.
I don't remember Herzog publicly announcing he was going to trade Templeton or Hernandez for example.
on the wall was there. Look at the accomplishments of Hernandez were in his 20's for a couple minimal
level pitchers. Keith was a large part of both StL and NYM. Templeton went crazy flipped off
the crowd changed his career in a moment.
Bloom never has said he was giving guys away. There is still a price and demand for each player is what sets
that price. Cards don't have to make any more trades and would survive fine. They Gray trade shows this.
It was done very early. Sure the Cards threw money in but the player was still wanted to pitch
not because he had a coupon. IF the contract was $25/per instead of drastically deferred or backloaded
money wouldn't have been a issue.