Zac Gallen was the Cardinals #24 prospect in 2017. I wouldn't count out Mautz. He's talented.ICCFIM2 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:30 pmI hope they are right. But, it is far from certain that either Bernal or Crooks are more than JAGs. Mathews needs to demonstrate control and health. Hence health. Baez who is not ranked is my great hope. But, like Gorman, he needs to demonstrate he can make contact at the higher levels.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
I also asked on the Monday chat about the three Springfield starters, Henderson, Hansen and Mautz. The answer was quite discouraging, Henderson is back of the rotation and the other 2 are bullpen and may not even be protected this year from the rule 5 draft.
2026 will be another runway year. Perhaps all of the prospects listed above, except Rodriguez get at least a cup of coffee in the majors next year. That should give us at least an idea of where we stand. But, I have a hard time getting excited about hitters who hit sub 800 OPS in the minors. I also have a hard time getting excited about pitchers who either can't stay healthy or they walk 70 guys in 94 innings in the minors. Numbers and health tend to deteriorate in the majors, not improve.
Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
As we should. Teams with legitimate track records should be given the benefit of the doubt.For instance, when we talk about a prospect from Tampa Bay, often we assume they are good because of where they come from
I'm curious to see how TB's abilities to recognize and develop new talent hold up with new ownership in place.
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
And every 13th round draft pick will be the next Albert Pujols! Your exclamations about bunches of prospects know no bounds.Cranny wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:39 pmZac Gallen was the Cardinals #24 prospect in 2017. I wouldn't count out Mautz. He's talented.ICCFIM2 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:30 pmI hope they are right. But, it is far from certain that either Bernal or Crooks are more than JAGs. Mathews needs to demonstrate control and health. Hence health. Baez who is not ranked is my great hope. But, like Gorman, he needs to demonstrate he can make contact at the higher levels.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
I also asked on the Monday chat about the three Springfield starters, Henderson, Hansen and Mautz. The answer was quite discouraging, Henderson is back of the rotation and the other 2 are bullpen and may not even be protected this year from the rule 5 draft.
2026 will be another runway year. Perhaps all of the prospects listed above, except Rodriguez get at least a cup of coffee in the majors next year. That should give us at least an idea of where we stand. But, I have a hard time getting excited about hitters who hit sub 800 OPS in the minors. I also have a hard time getting excited about pitchers who either can't stay healthy or they walk 70 guys in 94 innings in the minors. Numbers and health tend to deteriorate in the majors, not improve.
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
I read a little while back that his secondary pitches are honestly not as bad as they were made out to be. That he just didn’t throw them enough because he didn’t have to because his fastball was so ridiculously dominant in college. If true, That’s a simple fix as he makes his way through the minors.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:33 pm #19 for Doyle at this point strikes me as a bit aggressive. Maybe wait until he develops at least one quality secondary pitch?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 4371
- Joined: 05 May 2020 14:17 pm
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Exactly. This is nothing but a guestimation.icon wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:24 pmPut me in the camp of I'll believe it when I see it after the flops of Carlson, Gorman and Walker.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
A revamped and updated farm system with a POBO that actually cares and has a proven track record in farm development is reason for optimism with this new wave of players.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 21:07 pmExactly. This is nothing but a guestimation.icon wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:24 pmPut me in the camp of I'll believe it when I see it after the flops of Carlson, Gorman and Walker.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
I've read the same.Banner29 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 20:55 pmI read a little while back that his secondary pitches are honestly not as bad as they were made out to be. That he just didn’t throw them enough because he didn’t have to because his fastball was so ridiculously dominant in college. If true, That’s a simple fix as he makes his way through the minors.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:33 pm #19 for Doyle at this point strikes me as a bit aggressive. Maybe wait until he develops at least one quality secondary pitch?
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Figured the Baseball Writer for the Post should know more than me. I hope these guys are good. I think they have a couple of high upside with lower floors in the Baez boys. They also seem to have a lot of pitchers who are targeted as back of the rotation starters and not front of the rotation guys. Perhaps we get a surprise to the upside. All three guys in Springfield had good results. We will see what they do in Memphis in 2026. What they are really missing are high upside OFs and high upside pitchers. Perhaps Bloom can help change that this offseason. But, it seems to be a multi year project.Cranny wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:39 pmZac Gallen was the Cardinals #24 prospect in 2017. I wouldn't count out Mautz. He's talented.ICCFIM2 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:30 pmI hope they are right. But, it is far from certain that either Bernal or Crooks are more than JAGs. Mathews needs to demonstrate control and health. Hence health. Baez who is not ranked is my great hope. But, like Gorman, he needs to demonstrate he can make contact at the higher levels.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
I also asked on the Monday chat about the three Springfield starters, Henderson, Hansen and Mautz. The answer was quite discouraging, Henderson is back of the rotation and the other 2 are bullpen and may not even be protected this year from the rule 5 draft.
2026 will be another runway year. Perhaps all of the prospects listed above, except Rodriguez get at least a cup of coffee in the majors next year. That should give us at least an idea of where we stand. But, I have a hard time getting excited about hitters who hit sub 800 OPS in the minors. I also have a hard time getting excited about pitchers who either can't stay healthy or they walk 70 guys in 94 innings in the minors. Numbers and health tend to deteriorate in the majors, not improve.
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
+1icon wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:24 pmPut me in the camp of I'll believe it when I see it after the flops of Carlson, Gorman and Walker.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
And don't forget Alex Reyes.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 240
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:47 pm
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
I was surprised on the prognostication for Henderson. Dan Guerrero has more and better connections than most of us combined - and I'm splitting hairs here - but Ixan seems like a mid-rotation guy. Not an ace. But a No. 5 seems light. I'm meh on Hansen, but Mautz did a lot to raise his stock this summer. We shall see.ICCFIM2 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 21:46 pmFigured the Baseball Writer for the Post should know more than me. I hope these guys are good. I think they have a couple of high upside with lower floors in the Baez boys. They also seem to have a lot of pitchers who are targeted as back of the rotation starters and not front of the rotation guys. Perhaps we get a surprise to the upside. All three guys in Springfield had good results. We will see what they do in Memphis in 2026. What they are really missing are high upside OFs and high upside pitchers. Perhaps Bloom can help change that this offseason. But, it seems to be a multi year project.Cranny wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:39 pmZac Gallen was the Cardinals #24 prospect in 2017. I wouldn't count out Mautz. He's talented.ICCFIM2 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:30 pmI hope they are right. But, it is far from certain that either Bernal or Crooks are more than JAGs. Mathews needs to demonstrate control and health. Hence health. Baez who is not ranked is my great hope. But, like Gorman, he needs to demonstrate he can make contact at the higher levels.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
I also asked on the Monday chat about the three Springfield starters, Henderson, Hansen and Mautz. The answer was quite discouraging, Henderson is back of the rotation and the other 2 are bullpen and may not even be protected this year from the rule 5 draft.
2026 will be another runway year. Perhaps all of the prospects listed above, except Rodriguez get at least a cup of coffee in the majors next year. That should give us at least an idea of where we stand. But, I have a hard time getting excited about hitters who hit sub 800 OPS in the minors. I also have a hard time getting excited about pitchers who either can't stay healthy or they walk 70 guys in 94 innings in the minors. Numbers and health tend to deteriorate in the majors, not improve.
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Most fail in every system.CardsBest wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 21:52 pm+1icon wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:24 pmPut me in the camp of I'll believe it when I see it after the flops of Carlson, Gorman and Walker.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
And don't forget Alex Reyes.
Dodgers included.
Hopefully a few on the list do come through along with a few not on this list.
The Cardinals are due for a couple.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 16
- Joined: 08 Oct 2025 23:31 pm
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
The ole “simple fix” nothing to worry about folksBanner29 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 20:55 pmI read a little while back that his secondary pitches are honestly not as bad as they were made out to be. That he just didn’t throw them enough because he didn’t have to because his fastball was so ridiculously dominant in college. If true, That’s a simple fix as he makes his way through the minors.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:33 pm #19 for Doyle at this point strikes me as a bit aggressive. Maybe wait until he develops at least one quality secondary pitch?

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 6183
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Im optimistic Bloom can bolster the farm. But not sure im buying a jump to #1 farm system this fast.
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Quinn Mathews and Tink Hence took steps backward due to injury this year. After return, Mathews lost a couple of ticks on his fastball.Mr Buttercup wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025 16:19 pm Fangraphs has 7 Cardinals in the top 100
9 JJ Wetherholt
19 Liam Doyle
40 Leonardo Bernal
71 Rainiel Rodriguez
77 Jimmy Crooks
83 Quinn Mathews
87 Tink Hence
Crooks is borderline top 100 at best. Thats 3 catchers in that list.
The Cardinals do not have the top farm system in the MLB. They will be doing good to be in the top 10. That's if other teams ahead of them graduated
Re: Fangraphs Ranks Cardinals system #1
Think how great we will be next year
FanGraphs vs Baseball Savant vs Baseball Reference vs Brooks Baseball: Each offers unique strengths for baseball analytics, catering to different needs.
Here's a breakdown of how these platforms compare across key dimensions:
Focus Areas & Data Coverage
Platform Primary Focus Data Sources & Strengths
FanGraphs Advanced stats, projections, fantasy tools, player evaluation Offers fWAR, ZiPS projections, deep sabermetric analysis FanGraphs Baseball Reddit
Baseball Savant Statcast data: exit velocity, launch angle, sprint speed, pitch tracking Powered by MLB’s Statcast system; ideal for visualizing player movement and batted ball data Baseball Savant texastechbaseball.com
Baseball Reference Historical stats, traditional metrics, player comparisons Comprehensive historical database; uses rWAR; great for quick lookups and legacy stats Baseball-Reference.com Reddit
Brooks Baseball Pitch-level data: velocity, movement, release point, pitch usage Uses Pitch Info classification; detailed pitch charts and splits Baseball Fever Reddit
WAR Differences
FanGraphs (fWAR): Uses FIP-based pitching metrics and UZR for defense.
Baseball Reference (rWAR): Uses RA9-based pitching and DRS for defense.
These differences lead to variations in WAR values across the platforms Reddit Baseball-Reference.com.
Best Use Cases
FanGraphs: Ideal for fantasy baseball, player projections, and sabermetric deep dives.
Baseball Savant: Best for visualizing Statcast data like sprint speed, barrel rate, and pitch movement.
Baseball Reference: Great for historical comparisons, career stats, and quick player lookups.
Brooks Baseball: Preferred by analysts for pitch-by-pitch breakdowns and scouting reports.
Pitch Data Nuances
Brooks Baseball and FanGraphs both use Pitch Info, but classification methods differ slightly.
Baseball Savant uses MLB’s Statcast with Hawkeye tracking, offering more granular data but sometimes inconsistent classifications Baseball Fever Reddit.
FanGraphs vs Baseball Savant vs Baseball Reference vs Brooks Baseball: Each offers unique strengths for baseball analytics, catering to different needs.
Here's a breakdown of how these platforms compare across key dimensions:
Platform Primary Focus Data Sources & Strengths
FanGraphs Advanced stats, projections, fantasy tools, player evaluation Offers fWAR, ZiPS projections, deep sabermetric analysis FanGraphs Baseball Reddit
Baseball Savant Statcast data: exit velocity, launch angle, sprint speed, pitch tracking Powered by MLB’s Statcast system; ideal for visualizing player movement and batted ball data Baseball Savant texastechbaseball.com
Baseball Reference Historical stats, traditional metrics, player comparisons Comprehensive historical database; uses rWAR; great for quick lookups and legacy stats Baseball-Reference.com Reddit
Brooks Baseball Pitch-level data: velocity, movement, release point, pitch usage Uses Pitch Info classification; detailed pitch charts and splits Baseball Fever Reddit
FanGraphs (fWAR): Uses FIP-based pitching metrics and UZR for defense.
Baseball Reference (rWAR): Uses RA9-based pitching and DRS for defense.
These differences lead to variations in WAR values across the platforms Reddit Baseball-Reference.com.
FanGraphs: Ideal for fantasy baseball, player projections, and sabermetric deep dives.
Baseball Savant: Best for visualizing Statcast data like sprint speed, barrel rate, and pitch movement.
Baseball Reference: Great for historical comparisons, career stats, and quick player lookups.
Brooks Baseball: Preferred by analysts for pitch-by-pitch breakdowns and scouting reports.
Brooks Baseball and FanGraphs both use Pitch Info, but classification methods differ slightly.
Baseball Savant uses MLB’s Statcast with Hawkeye tracking, offering more granular data but sometimes inconsistent classifications Baseball Fever Reddit.