STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1516942
Yeah, tough luck for Mets and RH on that one. Hopefully we got a good player out of it though. And maybe RH will come back to us on a discount lol! I know just making that suggestion might upset more than a few posters here!NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 10:52 amNot saying he was good with the Mets (he wasn’t), but weird things happen in small samples, especially with relievers. In his 20 IP with the Mets, he had a .362 BABIP-against and a 14.5% HR/FB ratio. Too many BBs (4.95 BB/9), which of course are on him, but the guy just couldn't catch a break. I’m guessing the Mets view it as a reasonable trade that just didn’t work out. As you say, it happens.CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 10:38 amI have to assume they thought were getting something closer to last year’s RH than what they got. He still had an ERA in the lower 3 range when they acquired him. But it probably still doesn’t matter in the grand scheme. Trades just turn out like that sometimes. It just happened to turn out REALLY bad for them in that one though.Jatalk wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 10:10 amMy guess is it would not impact anything. They knew what they were getting with Helsley
There are reasons he’s worth 23, 000, 000, 000rockondlouie wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:11 am If he does, then don't pay a penny of his remaining salary.
S. Cohen is worth $23,000,000,000!
NADO's remaining salary falls of of his pocket when he buys his daily Starbuck's coffee.
So predictable and useless drivel. Kind of like a national enquirer vibe. Attention for the shadester.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
As the result, some good discussion on a timely topic. Maybe you should try to contribute something instead of being NewYorker's "yes man". That's weak. But not unexpected coming from you.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 12:06 pmSo predictable and useless drivel. Kind of like a national enquirer vibe. Attention for the shadester.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
I thought you had me on ignore dingy. Snappy comeback from a regular spam man.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 12:27 pmAs the result, some good discussion on a timely topic. Maybe you should try to contribute something instead of being NewYorker's "yes man". That's weak. But not unexpected coming from you.MIDMOBIRDTWO wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 12:06 pmSo predictable and useless drivel. Kind of like a national enquirer vibe. Attention for the shadester.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
It’s a relatively even trade. I could see the Cardinals using Manea’s salary as an excuse not to sign an SP.RunSup wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 12:16 pm Arenado contract: https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/player/_/id ... an-arenado
Manea Contract: https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/player/_/id ... ean-manaea
Manea 2025 injuries: https://sports.yahoo.com/article/mets-s ... 57464.html
Manea started the season on the IL with an oblique strain that kept him out til mid season. Then "loose bodies" diagnosed in his arm
They claim now he doesn't need off-season surgery. But yeah right. He'll need surgery.
According to Sportrac, Manea is owed ~$39M through 2027. With additional $23.25M deferred over 10 years beginning in 2035.
Arenado is owed $31M through 2027. With additional -$42M of deferrals continuing from 2026 thru 2041
Both teams would be just dumping contracts. Questionable whether Manea pitches effectively again. Arenado at least can play the field. Optimistically, he recovers doubles power and a .750 OPS. But that's looking through rose colored glasses.. Both probably need off-season arm surgery.
The additional prospect returned is middling. But Nado was never going to return a top prospect.
In all fairness, though...these click bait sites written by regular joe schmo...are not worth paying any attention to and I wish they didn't exist.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:36 amGive it a rest man. Your sulky attitude regarding such trivial things indicates your life must be miserable. Seeking attention is not my goal. Discussing Cardinals baseball is. Cranny was right on about you.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
Just ignore them then. It's speculative trade talk just like with many CT posters. It's harmless.clemonsonroots wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:01 pmIn all fairness, though...these click bait sites written by regular joe schmo...are not worth paying any attention to and I wish they didn't exist.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:36 amGive it a rest man. Your sulky attitude regarding such trivial things indicates your life must be miserable. Seeking attention is not my goal. Discussing Cardinals baseball is. Cranny was right on about you.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
yeah, but I don't get bombarded on my phone with cards talk threads like I do with these articles, and if you aren't paying attention you may actually think its a true thing that happened when it is nothing but drivel.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:04 pmJust ignore them then. It's speculative trade talk just like with many CT posters. It's harmless.clemonsonroots wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:01 pmIn all fairness, though...these click bait sites written by regular joe schmo...are not worth paying any attention to and I wish they didn't exist.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:36 amGive it a rest man. Your sulky attitude regarding such trivial things indicates your life must be miserable. Seeking attention is not my goal. Discussing Cardinals baseball is. Cranny was right on about you.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
So what ?clemonsonroots wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:07 pmyeah, but I don't get bombarded on my phone with cards talk threads like I do with these articles, and if you aren't paying attention you may actually think its a true thing that happened when it is nothing but drivel.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:04 pmJust ignore them then. It's speculative trade talk just like with many CT posters. It's harmless.clemonsonroots wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:01 pmIn all fairness, though...these click bait sites written by regular joe schmo...are not worth paying any attention to and I wish they didn't exist.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:36 amGive it a rest man. Your sulky attitude regarding such trivial things indicates your life must be miserable. Seeking attention is not my goal. Discussing Cardinals baseball is. Cranny was right on about you.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
so what?Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:12 pmSo what ?clemonsonroots wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:07 pmyeah, but I don't get bombarded on my phone with cards talk threads like I do with these articles, and if you aren't paying attention you may actually think its a true thing that happened when it is nothing but drivel.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:04 pmJust ignore them then. It's speculative trade talk just like with many CT posters. It's harmless.clemonsonroots wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 20:01 pmIn all fairness, though...these click bait sites written by regular joe schmo...are not worth paying any attention to and I wish they didn't exist.Shady wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:36 amGive it a rest man. Your sulky attitude regarding such trivial things indicates your life must be miserable. Seeking attention is not my goal. Discussing Cardinals baseball is. Cranny was right on about you.NYCardsFan wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025 09:24 am Another day, another Shady thread about a purely speculative MSN/SI/Fansided clickbait article, wrapped in an intentionally misleading thread title in order to get more clicks/attention.
Too soon.
