Re: Reds beat cubs 1-0
Posted: 19 Sep 2025 15:51 pm
The first baseman touched it. That's why the 3 is in the 3-8-6. Funny thing is, with a no hitter going, if the first baseman had not touched it and it hit Ballesteros, he would have been out and the batter would have been scored a hit, thus breaking up the no hitter.icon wrote: ↑19 Sep 2025 14:57 pmAlso weird that the runner in that case is not out for being hit by a batted ball because the ball had already cleared the Reds first baseman.illinik wrote: ↑19 Sep 2025 14:47 pm What? No mention of the 3-8-6 forceout? First of it's kind!
https://www.mlb.com/gameday/776282/vide ... ong-gd6gj6