Realistic trade chip possibilities
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 879
- Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
Trade for what? Pitching, position players, prospects?
Who steps in and fills the void?
Who steps in and fills the void?
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
Absolutely no one should be off limits. These players are almost all B level players both in the big leagues and minors. Most trades would require multiple players going for anything reasonable in return.
Free agency is probably the better way to step back into relevance.
Free agency is probably the better way to step back into relevance.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
To me, anyone except Winn, Wetherholt, Doyle, Liberatore, and McGreevy can be traded. Liberatore and McGreevy not so much because they are excellent, but because there aren't alternatives. If they develop alternatives, I would be willing to re-visit that thought.
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
There is not a player in the organization they shouldn't consider trading. There are no players in the organization that have top 10 player in the league status. There is not one player that would ever have a shot at finishing in top 10 in MVP.
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
If Contreras doesn't waive ntc BurlyGone.
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
Exactly. And pitching. That's the recipe for winning if you are a team who can't pay Judge Ohtani Harper Soto etc. Pitching Defense speed Obp. I like you mentioned Scott. He will evolve.hmoss859 wrote: ↑18 Sep 2025 18:54 pm The 3 NTC guys should all be traded-If you keep Burleson he needs to play 1B, and Herrea only position is DH
Nootbaar, Donovan, Gorman, Walker, Church can all go bye-bye too.
They need to build around Winn, Wetherholt and Scott in my opinion.
Need as many athletes as possible, not a bunch of slow pitch lugs.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 997
- Joined: 02 May 2025 19:12 pm
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
“blown away”
No GM ever: Hey, will you take our #2 starter for your slow fat platoon DH/1B?
Bloom: Nope, if you want him you gotta blow me away.
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
Donovan has value for trade IMO. The others you listed are more to complete a trade package. Walker may have zero value as he looks like a total colossal bust. But to get return you have to consider others such as Winn and Burley. Hopefully work out NTC for Arenado, WC and Gray. It will be painful to move some of these guys. But all have to be on the table. You have to pay to play. We need broad strokes not surgical moves.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12277
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
#1
Donny
Could bring back a solid #3 in a solo deal, even better if coupled w/?????
#2
Noot
Could bring back a low end #3/4 in a solo deal, solid #3 if coupled w/????
#3
VSII
No solo trade value above a solid prospect but value given his superior defense & base stealing ability
#4
Walker & Gorman have little more than prospect return value
#5
Church
Has no trade value, JAG
NADO is simply a salary dump where BDWJr has to eat at least 50% of his deal for a lotto prospect
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
What do you guys expect to get for Donovan and Burleson? They are the best two hitters on the team with a few more years before free agency. How do you replace them? I would rather trade Winn and get a center fielder who can hit. Wetherholt and Saggesse are good enough to replace him. I would also trade Walker, Scott and Gorman but I doubt they would bring enough back
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 12277
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
I. Hererranebfan wrote: ↑19 Sep 2025 09:29 am What do you guys expect to get for Donovan and Burleson? They are the best two hitters on the team with a few more years before free agency. How do you replace them? I would rather trade Winn and get a center fielder who can hit. Wetherholt and Saggesse are good enough to replace him. I would also trade Walker, Scott and Gorman but I doubt they would bring enough back
&
Willy C
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 82
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:45 pm
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
Donovan, Burleson, Herrera and Contreras are our best hitters. A team so offensively challenges shouldn't trade them.
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
Yes, it would be nice to keep those four in the process of obtaining needed starting pitching.OregonRedbird wrote: ↑19 Sep 2025 12:50 pm Donovan, Burleson, Herrera and Contreras are our best hitters. A team so offensively challenges shouldn't trade them.
Re: Realistic trade chip possibilities
Unfortunately.... it usually comes down to:
The guys you would prefer to KEEP will bring MORE in return.
So...it can be a tough call on pulling the trigger or not?
Happens every year to most teams.
The guys you would prefer to KEEP will bring MORE in return.
So...it can be a tough call on pulling the trigger or not?
Happens every year to most teams.