Clayton Kershaw to Retire After 2025

[cardstatman]

Six consecutive years now for STL to not make it to the Elite 8... and only once in the past 10 years.

Memories of playoff success are fading. However, it was always fun to beat Kershaw.

Memories will always light the corners of your mind….

Yes. Every time I shut my eye-lidge, I have happy memories.

Supposedly one of Brad's teammates on the plane back to St Louis said something like,. "Hey Lidge, I think we just passed Pujols homer!".

The Astros had the last laugh though.

[govman]

Saw him quite a bit in LA. An all time great.

sorry, when you said "all-time great", I thought I was listening to Buster Olney calling him "the greatest of ALL time" (obviously doesn't know anything about pitchers before 1980). No he's not all that! 222 wins would rank him about 20 on all time list. And you can't say he's the beat of this generation with Verlander and Scherzer around

[govman]

He’s currently 222-96

How hard is it to play for 18 years and be 126 games over .500 and not lose 100 games?

I know he plays for LAD, but still…

Didn't Jim Kaat--without the tools of Kershaw or playing on championship teams--win 300! games over same length of time

[Imperial Capitalist]

He’s currently 222-96

How hard is it to play for 18 years and be 126 games over .500 and not lose 100 games?

I know he plays for LAD, but still…

Didn't Jim Kaat--without the tools of Kershaw or playing on championship teams--win 300! games over same length of time

Kaat went 283-237 over 25 years, and was primarily a reliever for his final 5 seasons.

[Absolut]

Saw him quite a bit in LA. An all time great.

sorry, when you said "all-time great", I thought I was listening to Buster Olney calling him "the greatest of ALL time" (obviously doesn't know anything about pitchers before 1980). No he's not all that! 222 wins would rank him about 20 on all time list. And you can't say he's the beat of this generation with Verlander and Scherzer around

Top 5 all time winning percentage and whip
Top 20 ks.
11 All stars, 3 cy young, 2 runner up, mvp.


How is he not an all time great?

[govman]

Saw him quite a bit in LA. An all time great.

sorry, when you said "all-time great", I thought I was listening to Buster Olney calling him "the greatest of ALL time" (obviously doesn't know anything about pitchers before 1980). No he's not all that! 222 wins would rank him about 20 on all time list. And you can't say he's the beat of this generation with Verlander and Scherzer around

Top 5 all time winning percentage and whip
Top 20 ks.
11 All stars, 3 cy young, 2 runner up, mvp.


How is he not an all time great?

that doesn't equate to "greatest of all time"!

[makesnosense]

Saw him quite a bit in LA. An all time great.

sorry, when you said "all-time great", I thought I was listening to Buster Olney calling him "the greatest of ALL time" (obviously doesn't know anything about pitchers before 1980). No he's not all that! 222 wins would rank him about 20 on all time list. And you can't say he's the beat of this generation with Verlander and Scherzer around

Top 5 all time winning percentage and whip
Top 20 ks.
11 All stars, 3 cy young, 2 runner up, mvp.


How is he not an all time great?

that doesn't equate to "greatest of all time"!

He didn't say Kershaw was the greatest of all time. He said all time great. But saying he is the greatest of all time is closer to the mark then an absurd comparison to Jim Kaat.