For someone who spends so much time thinking and typing up posts related to roster construction...well...at least typing them up...it's quite interesting how little time has been spent looking around the league at other rosters, or even having gained an understanding of how rosters change over timea smell of green grass wrote: ↑20 Sep 2025 07:19 am
While I agree that it is foolish to rush a young player, I also believe it is foolish to think that there is no damage as you wait.
1) A later prospect that may be great will pass you by because are married to the wrong one.
2) Expensive old free-agents are continually signed and cycled, leaving no continuity in it's wake. See Faksa and Bjugstadt and Fowler as examples. None had a chance of being on the roster for long. Most teams sign older FA's to round out the roster for a Cup run. The Blues sign them to cover up roster holes and draft mistakes. Show me a Bjugstadt, and I'll show you failed Center draft selections by Army.
3) There is an old NHL adage. The longer it takes for a player to make the NHL, the LESS IMPACT he will bring. "Waiting for 3rd-liners" makes no sense as they are a dime a dozen. The team should be laser-focused on finding young top-liners. They NEVER bring up the topic, because the never make any progress on it (VIA THE DRAFT which is the traditional way of finding them)
4) The Blues have one of the oldest rosters in the league. The primary reason for this is poor drafting by Doug Armstrong. Based on past results, Doug Armstrong's draft picks should be a on a SHORT LEASH, not a SLOW ROLL. See Scott Perunovich for an example.
Army has inferred that the most valuable and worthwhile acquisitions do not come via UFA signings. Every team makes short-term bottom-6 signings, and Army does a great job forcing competition to make the team. If a prospect is knocking on the doorstep, he provides the opportunity to take a roster spot but does not grant it. Faksa and Fowler were not free agents, but trade acquisitions that filled important roles. Fowler is cheap for what he is bringing. ANA even ate part of the contract. Bjugstadt adds an element to the bottom 6 we didn't have, and is very cheap.
Snuggerudd has just made it to the top-6 in the fastest possible time period (as a college player).
It took Thomas several years, after playing his entire rookie season on the 3rd line to help win a Cup, and is now one of the best centers in the league. Kyrou was drafted 2nd round and is now top-6. Neighbours has bounched around in the top-9 and is looked at as future Captain material.
Dvorsky, Stenberg, and possibly Stancl are 20 year old top-6 players who will arrive in the next several seasons, probably with some time on the 3rd line first (maybe 4th for Stancl). This thread is about Jiricek, who along with Lindstein are looking to be top-4 defenseman. Defenseman typically take longer to develop, but they'll arrive over the next several seasons as well. Mailloux was acquired for a player who is a top line forward and will be taking Faulk's spot very soon.
The team became old because we won a Cup and tried to keep that winning rolling, and then had to tear it down. What you've described is what happens to teams in that position as they go through the transition to getting young again. It's not anyone's fault but yours that you're too impatient to let it happen, yet you blame Army's drafting which landed 9 WJC players last year (most of any team). In 2 years we'll be a young team and very good. We're even a good team right now. Good luck keeping up your schtick while that happens.