Velocity vs. command

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

jw0595
Forum User
Posts: 435
Joined: 23 May 2024 22:57 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by jw0595 »

1) The cyclical nature of things. At some point, someone will take a chance on the next Greg Maddux & command & control will be back in.
2) Pretty much all scouts are wannabe coaches. Coaches always think they can take a "toolsy" player & coach him up. A player who is already "coached up" but is physically maxed out has a perceptively lower ceiling. If they draft someone who has all of the tools, but they never develop, that's someone else's fault.
3) Strictly from a PR standpoint, it's a much easier sell. "We're bringing up triple digit throwing Helsley." is a much easier sell than "We're bringing up Brad Thompson, whose fastball has been known to trip the radar guns at 88 mph."
icon
Forum User
Posts: 4138
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by icon »

rockondlouie wrote: 08 Aug 2025 12:51 pm
Hazelwood72 wrote: 08 Aug 2025 12:47 pm In my many years of watching Cardinal baseball and MLB baseball in general, the best pitcher I ever saw was Sandy Koufax in his prime. And it took Koufax about 5 years to learn command. In his early career he threw even harder, but walked more batters and threw more wild pitches. It took Norm Sherry, his Dodger catcher, to get Sandy to throw at 90 percent rather than 100 percent.

It’s like when I golf. If I swing at 90 percent, I hit the ball straighter and farther than when I swing from the heels.

It’s the great athletes like Koufax who can find that fine line between too little effort and too much effort, and duplicate it time after time.
And look how long it took N. Ryan to develop command too!
And Randy Johnson.
BrockFloodMaris
Forum User
Posts: 2450
Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by BrockFloodMaris »

ScotchMIrish wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:58 am
craviduce wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:38 am
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
you don't get as much run on the fastball at lower velocity...better arm and glove side movement with a fastball at 95mph vs. 92-93mph

edit ~ the possibility of the movement is greater at higher velocities....not everyone can get that movement. Sorry, I misspoke
Greg Maddux got a lot of movement on his 80's speed fastball. Of course he also got a foot wider strike zone from the umpires.

It's velocity, control, movement, changing speeds, ability to throw multiple pitches with the same delivery so the batters don't have a "tell".
Maddux was a freak! He could “tunnel” several different pitches from the same arm slot. He would change velo, location, spin rate and movement direction from the same delivery. The Professor was otherworldly.
OldRed
Forum User
Posts: 2411
Joined: 23 May 2024 15:53 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by OldRed »

BrockFloodMaris wrote: 08 Aug 2025 16:44 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:58 am
craviduce wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:38 am
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
you don't get as much run on the fastball at lower velocity...better arm and glove side movement with a fastball at 95mph vs. 92-93mph

edit ~ the possibility of the movement is greater at higher velocities....not everyone can get that movement. Sorry, I misspoke
Greg Maddux got a lot of movement on his 80's speed fastball. Of course he also got a foot wider strike zone from the umpires.

It's velocity, control, movement, changing speeds, ability to throw multiple pitches with the same delivery so the batters don't have a "tell".
Maddux was a freak! He could “tunnel” several different pitches from the same arm slot. He would change velo, location, spin rate and movement direction from the same delivery. The Professor was otherworldly.
Was Warren Spahn?
Clubmaker2
Forum User
Posts: 1705
Joined: 16 Apr 2021 16:53 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by Clubmaker2 »

Curt Schilling gave an interview where he explained there was a big difference between 93 and 97 and basically how like each mile per hour or something was like a half a ball wider you could get a batter to chase off the plate. So like if you throw 97 you can more easily get guys to chase a pitch two balls wide off the plate.. Pitch 93, not so easy.
BrockFloodMaris
Forum User
Posts: 2450
Joined: 06 Aug 2019 16:06 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by BrockFloodMaris »

OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 17:21 pm
BrockFloodMaris wrote: 08 Aug 2025 16:44 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:58 am
craviduce wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:38 am
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
you don't get as much run on the fastball at lower velocity...better arm and glove side movement with a fastball at 95mph vs. 92-93mph

edit ~ the possibility of the movement is greater at higher velocities....not everyone can get that movement. Sorry, I misspoke
Greg Maddux got a lot of movement on his 80's speed fastball. Of course he also got a foot wider strike zone from the umpires.

It's velocity, control, movement, changing speeds, ability to throw multiple pitches with the same delivery so the batters don't have a "tell".
Maddux was a freak! He could “tunnel” several different pitches from the same arm slot. He would change velo, location, spin rate and movement direction from the same delivery. The Professor was otherworldly.
Was Warren Spahn?
Haven’t a clue.
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 13102
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by An Old Friend »

jw0595 wrote: 08 Aug 2025 14:09 pm 1) The cyclical nature of things. At some point, someone will take a chance on the next Greg Maddux & command & control will be back in.
2) Pretty much all scouts are wannabe coaches. Coaches always think they can take a "toolsy" player & coach him up. A player who is already "coached up" but is physically maxed out has a perceptively lower ceiling. If they draft someone who has all of the tools, but they never develop, that's someone else's fault.
3) Strictly from a PR standpoint, it's a much easier sell. "We're bringing up triple digit throwing Helsley." is a much easier sell than "We're bringing up Brad Thompson, whose fastball has been known to trip the radar guns at 88 mph."
“Take a chance on the next Greg Maddux”… meaning a guy with good command and above average velocity? He threw in the 90’s when he came up. He also had like 80 command.
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 1055
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by CCard »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 08 Aug 2025 12:28 pm
CCard wrote: 08 Aug 2025 12:08 pm
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
The faster the velocity the less time a batter has to read spin and react. That being said, you could throw the ball a 200 mph and it's useless if you can't keep it near the plate. That's why it's so rare when a pitcher does both.
Much of that lack of command would be due to huge movement I’d think. Hard to control exact movement. Like forecasting weather; just hope to get close.
Yeah, because of the higher velocity there's less of a margin for error when the arm comes forward and down. Power pitchers have more trouble harnessing that thing.
CrownRoyalCaramel
Forum User
Posts: 113
Joined: 26 Apr 2024 13:58 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by CrownRoyalCaramel »

craviduce wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:38 am
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
you don't get as much run on the fastball at lower velocity...better arm and glove side movement with a fastball at 95mph vs. 92-93mph

edit ~ the possibility of the movement is greater at higher velocities....not everyone can get that movement. Sorry, I misspoke

Your edit is true. I have always thought Helsley had minimal movement on his fastball, but he throws it hard
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 4358
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by Cardinals4Life »

OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
What's the old saying?
"I don't care how fast you throw ball 4!"
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 4358
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by Cardinals4Life »

Quincy Varnish wrote: 08 Aug 2025 12:53 pm
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
Mikolas
Poor example, unless he means to locate his pitches over the heart of the plate!
golfindude
Forum User
Posts: 91
Joined: 01 Feb 2019 17:41 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by golfindude »

Golf comparison: A very good golfer who hits 220 yd drives should hit more fairways than a very good golfer who drives it 320.
ScotchMIrish
Forum User
Posts: 645
Joined: 08 Sep 2024 21:25 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by ScotchMIrish »

BrockFloodMaris wrote: 08 Aug 2025 16:44 pm
ScotchMIrish wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:58 am
craviduce wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:38 am
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
you don't get as much run on the fastball at lower velocity...better arm and glove side movement with a fastball at 95mph vs. 92-93mph

edit ~ the possibility of the movement is greater at higher velocities....not everyone can get that movement. Sorry, I misspoke
Greg Maddux got a lot of movement on his 80's speed fastball. Of course he also got a foot wider strike zone from the umpires.

It's velocity, control, movement, changing speeds, ability to throw multiple pitches with the same delivery so the batters don't have a "tell".
Maddux was a freak! He could “tunnel” several different pitches from the same arm slot. He would change velo, location, spin rate and movement direction from the same delivery. The Professor was otherworldly.
True - but if everybody else got his strike zone they would be similarly successful.
illiniriles
Forum User
Posts: 235
Joined: 18 Aug 2020 09:54 am

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by illiniriles »

Late movement is probably the biggest influence on swing and misses and weak contact, I saw a great interview with Greg Maddux and he stated that he could generate late movement on most of his pitches by varying the pressure he put on the baseball with the tips of his fingers. It makes a lot of sense because his pitches moved later than just about anyone's I ever saw. Also, Bruce Sutter's splitters moved late when he was "on". When he wasn't, they didn't and he could be hit.
jcgmoi
Forum User
Posts: 915
Joined: 23 May 2024 13:17 pm

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by jcgmoi »

Late movement and pinpoint control with everything he threw. He got tons of swings and misses and weak contact on pitches that were strikes until they weren't.

That's the basis for the canard of Maddux and the expanded strike-zone. The suggestion that without 'his strike zone' he'd be just another guy is ludicrous.
Goldfan
Forum User
Posts: 12021
Joined: 30 Mar 2019 07:58 am

Re: Velocity vs. command

Post by Goldfan »

3dender wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:51 am
OldRed wrote: 08 Aug 2025 11:33 am Everyone it seems is looking for guys that throw upper 90's. What's wrong with average velocity and great command?
What's wrong is that over the last 10-15 years, hitters have evolved to be able to hit other-worldly velocity and movement... so when an "average" velocity guy comes along with pitches that don't move all that much, even if he can spot all his pitches perfectly they look like meatballs.
Hitters have devolved…..
Go listen to Will Clark, Chipper Jones…..
Post Reply