Re: Mets gave up more to get Roger’s
Posted: 30 Jul 2025 18:47 pm
I raced Baez in the poconos. He has burly like speed, who hsd edman like athleticism. Who of course, had a Musial like eye.
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1515035
Quit using facts and talking sense. The rant raving has begun and will not stop until…well, with the moronic takes on this board probably never.Wattage wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025 18:34 pmRogers is a free agent just like helsley but has a 1.8 era and 0.86 whip while helsley has 3.00 era and 1.39 whip.
But Rogers also pitched in 70+ innings and 68+ games 4 yeats in a row while helsley has never putched 70 innings or more than 66 games and only pitched more than 54 games once and frequently makes himself unavailable- says he can never pitch 3 nights in a row- and doesnt like to pitch back to back nights too often either.
Im not quite sure why they thought helsley is worth more other than the save stat. Rogers has clearly been better and more available in a game to game basis
Not trading Helsley in the offseason was the poor decision as I and others wanted the team to do.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025 18:27 pm You aren’t going to get much for a closer who they are hitting .400 against his fast ball is a two month rental and they can’t offer him QO. Too many people believed Mel that the correct decision was to keep helsley and fedde and trade them at the deadline because their value would be higher than in the offseason. Easy obvious wrong. Both should have been traded in the offseason when me and others were saying it
It has nothing to do with defending the front office. Its more of realizing the trade worth of a guy who might pitch 15 innings for the Mets before he says "see ya!"ZouMiz2424 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025 18:26 pmWhy do you guys defend one of the pillars that ruined the cardinals so much ?
Choosing when to sell is whose responsibility? What would Helsley have gotten at last years deadline? Still one man’s failureRonnie Dobbs wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025 18:41 pmWeird. Those teams gave up more for pitchers who have either been better, are younger, have more team control, or some combination of those things??
That's crazy!!