Page 2 of 2
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 17 Jul 2025 17:50 pm
by Ronnie Dobbs
I like that instead of drafting a guy that is basically a fully formed pitcher and knowing exactly what he's going to be when (if) he reaches MLB, they took some guys that have some amazing stuff right now, or specific characteristics that they're looking for, and they're confident enough that they will be able to develop them more into something that they already are.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 17 Jul 2025 17:52 pm
by An Old Friend
Ronnie Dobbs wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 17:50 pm
I like that instead of drafting a guy that is basically a fully formed pitcher and knowing exactly what he's going to be when (if) he reaches MLB, they took some guys that have some amazing stuff right now, or specific characteristics that they're looking for, and they're confident enough that they will be able to develop them more into something that they already are.
Yesss. It seemed clear that they were drafting with an eye on carrying traits / elite tools.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 17 Jul 2025 20:20 pm
by ScotchMIrish
Mozeliak drafted a recent Cy Young winner and the ace of a NL championship team.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 17 Jul 2025 23:16 pm
by CCard
An Old Friend wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 17:06 pm
CCard wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 16:44 pm
1. He traded Betts. He should have told ownership to fire him first. They did anyway.
2. Ownership doesn't necessarily "run" the draft, but they sign off on all the drafts because they have to pay the signing bonuses. You might think Mo makes the decisions, but you'd be terribly mistaken. The buck stops with ownership. If you don't think they tell GM's who they can draft, I have a bridge for sale.
I don't know what to make of your first point. Want to try again? You're saying the first thing he should have done when taking the new job was to tell ownership to fire him when they said he needed to trade Mookie Betts and David Price?
On your second point... eek. Owners should be far away from the draft. And they are, for the most part.
Did trading Betts make Boston better? Either Bloom has balls or he doesn't. Stand up for your conviction. In one breath you say owners should be far away from baseball operations and in the other breath you defend Bloom saying "What can he do if owners want a player traded?" You can't have it both ways. Sure, it might have cost him his job but he lost that anyway.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 17 Jul 2025 23:26 pm
by An Old Friend
CCard wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 23:16 pm
An Old Friend wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 17:06 pm
CCard wrote: ↑17 Jul 2025 16:44 pm
1. He traded Betts. He should have told ownership to fire him first. They did anyway.
2. Ownership doesn't necessarily "run" the draft, but they sign off on all the drafts because they have to pay the signing bonuses. You might think Mo makes the decisions, but you'd be terribly mistaken. The buck stops with ownership. If you don't think they tell GM's who they can draft, I have a bridge for sale.
I don't know what to make of your first point. Want to try again? You're saying the first thing he should have done when taking the new job was to tell ownership to fire him when they said he needed to trade Mookie Betts and David Price?
On your second point... eek. Owners should be far away from the draft. And they are, for the most part.
Did trading Betts make Boston better? Either Bloom has balls or he doesn't. Stand up for your conviction. In one breath you say owners should be far away from baseball operations and in the other breath you defend Bloom saying "What can he do if owners want a player traded?" You can't have it both ways. Sure, it might have cost him his job but he lost that anyway.
Are you drunk, high, or both?
No, trading Betts at a discount in order to offload David Price’s contract did not make Boston better. No one would suggest that it did or was intended to. And trading Betts didn’t cost Bloom his job. It was the first thing he was tasked with doing.
Secondly, I said owners aren’t running the draft.
I never said or insinuated that they should be or are far away from baseball operations.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 18 Jul 2025 00:27 am
by Jobafish
jbrach wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 14:08 pm
why was whitey herzog not in his old job when the cards hired him?
That’s pretty much what I thought when I read his post lol
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 18 Jul 2025 06:10 am
by woofy25
So, is it safe to say Randy Flores has nothing to do with who gets drafted? It has been Mo and now Bloom this whole time? Maybe having the fifth pick was the real differentiator.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 18 Jul 2025 06:48 am
by scoutyjones2
Jatalk wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 10:48 am
Drafting at #5 helps
LoL
No kidding.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 18 Jul 2025 07:10 am
by CCard
jbrach wrote: ↑15 Jul 2025 14:08 pm
why was whitey herzog not in his old job when the cards hired him?
Because no matter how many times he took KC to the playoffs they just couldn't get past the Yankees. He came to Busch and Augustus game him a dual job as GM and Manager. The rest is history.
Re: Cardinals draft philosophy changing under Bloom
Posted: 18 Jul 2025 07:15 am
by HighHeat23
If only that were true...