STLtoday.com

JohnnyMO wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:10 pm Burly is having a good season. If he improves on last season’s stat line he should be penciled in as a starting player in 2026.

He needs to prove he can be consistent though. He had a good day today, but to start a thread like this for a guy who is 8 for 45 over the last two weeks is a little odd.

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:13 pm

JohnnyMO wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:10 pm Burly is having a good season. If he improves on last season’s stat line he should be penciled in as a starting player in 2026.

He needs to prove he can be consistent though. He had a good day today, but to start a thread like this for a guy who is 8 for 45 over the last two weeks is a little odd.

Like you said, "Burly is having a good season". Good observation.

2ninr wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:50 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:39 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 18:21 pm Only with a a higher batting average and a higher OPS. Also, considering his defensive progress. The 26 tear old is having a stellar season. He, currently, is a very good value for the St. Louis Cardinals. Just hope he doesn't have a slide in the second half like last season.

I'm not sure if Burleson's current MLB salary is much more than the minimum. Could Burleson's production/salary ratio be the highest value in the MLB, right now? Considering all the wasted salary/production contracts over the years for the Cardinals. Burleson appears to be a tremendous value. He's heading for a much higher, much deserved, payday.

You forgot to switch accounts.

ElliottG wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 20:52 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:59 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:55 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:51 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:39 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 18:21 pm Only with a a higher batting average and a higher OPS. Also, considering his defensive progress. The 26 tear old is having a stellar season. He, currently, is a very good value for the St. Louis Cardinals. Just hope he doesn't have a slide in the second half like last season.

I'm not sure if Burleson's current MLB salary is much more than the minimum. Could Burleson's production/salary ratio be the highest value in the MLB, right now? Considering all the wasted salary/production contracts over the years for the Cardinals. Burleson appears to be a tremendous value. He's heading for a much higher, much deserved, payday.

Remember to switch accounts when you quote yourself.

He’s not even the best value on the cards. He makes more than Winn and liberatore

So what? Burleson is THE best hitter on the team right now. Who's better?

Your premise was he’s the best value in the league thundercunt. I gave two better values on the cards. Scouty gave you one on the cubs.

de la Cruz makes less than your man crush. My god you are dumb. Crawl away from this thread and pretend it never happened.

First of all he didn’t say he was the best value, but ASKED IF HE COULD BE THE BEST VALUE. If you find this question to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:35 pm

ElliottG wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 20:52 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:59 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:55 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:51 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:39 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 18:21 pm Only with a a higher batting average and a higher OPS. Also, considering his defensive progress. The 26 tear old is having a stellar season. He, currently, is a very good value for the St. Louis Cardinals. Just hope he doesn't have a slide in the second half like last season.

I'm not sure if Burleson's current MLB salary is much more than the minimum. Could Burleson's production/salary ratio be the highest value in the MLB, right now? Considering all the wasted salary/production contracts over the years for the Cardinals. Burleson appears to be a tremendous value. He's heading for a much higher, much deserved, payday.

Remember to switch accounts when you quote yourself.

He’s not even the best value on the cards. He makes more than Winn and liberatore

So what? Burleson is THE best hitter on the team right now. Who's better?

Your premise was he’s the best value in the league thundercunt. I gave two better values on the cards. Scouty gave you one on the cubs.

de la Cruz makes less than your man crush. My god you are dumb. Crawl away from this thread and pretend it never happened.

First of all he didn’t say he was the best value, but ASKED IF HE COULD BE THE BEST VALUE. If you find this question to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you find this respinse to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:06 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:35 pm

ElliottG wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 20:52 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:59 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:55 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:51 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:39 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 18:21 pm Only with a a higher batting average and a higher OPS. Also, considering his defensive progress. The 26 tear old is having a stellar season. He, currently, is a very good value for the St. Louis Cardinals. Just hope he doesn't have a slide in the second half like last season.

I'm not sure if Burleson's current MLB salary is much more than the minimum. Could Burleson's production/salary ratio be the highest value in the MLB, right now? Considering all the wasted salary/production contracts over the years for the Cardinals. Burleson appears to be a tremendous value. He's heading for a much higher, much deserved, payday.

Remember to switch accounts when you quote yourself.

He’s not even the best value on the cards. He makes more than Winn and liberatore

So what? Burleson is THE best hitter on the team right now. Who's better?

Your premise was he’s the best value in the league thundercunt. I gave two better values on the cards. Scouty gave you one on the cubs.

de la Cruz makes less than your man crush. My god you are dumb. Crawl away from this thread and pretend it never happened.

First of all he didn’t say he was the best value, but ASKED IF HE COULD BE THE BEST VALUE. If you find this question to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you find this respinse to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you are referring to me. I just wanted to try to rectify your ignorance. The other gentleman just exhibits common sense. Something lacking in many screwballs here.

3dender wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:10 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:06 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:35 pm

ElliottG wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 20:52 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:59 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:55 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:51 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:39 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 18:21 pm Only with a a higher batting average and a higher OPS. Also, considering his defensive progress. The 26 tear old is having a stellar season. He, currently, is a very good value for the St. Louis Cardinals. Just hope he doesn't have a slide in the second half like last season.

I'm not sure if Burleson's current MLB salary is much more than the minimum. Could Burleson's production/salary ratio be the highest value in the MLB, right now? Considering all the wasted salary/production contracts over the years for the Cardinals. Burleson appears to be a tremendous value. He's heading for a much higher, much deserved, payday.

Remember to switch accounts when you quote yourself.

He’s not even the best value on the cards. He makes more than Winn and liberatore

So what? Burleson is THE best hitter on the team right now. Who's better?

Your premise was he’s the best value in the league thundercunt. I gave two better values on the cards. Scouty gave you one on the cubs.

de la Cruz makes less than your man crush. My god you are dumb. Crawl away from this thread and pretend it never happened.

First of all he didn’t say he was the best value, but ASKED IF HE COULD BE THE BEST VALUE. If you find this question to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you find this respinse to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you are referring to me. I just wanted to try to rectify your ignorance. The other gentleman just exhibits common sense. Something lacking in many screwballs here.

Lol how drunk are you cuz you're getting your alt accounts all sorts of confused on this thread.

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:13 pm

3dender wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:10 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:06 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:35 pm

ElliottG wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 20:52 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:59 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:55 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:51 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:39 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 18:21 pm Only with a a higher batting average and a higher OPS. Also, considering his defensive progress. The 26 tear old is having a stellar season. He, currently, is a very good value for the St. Louis Cardinals. Just hope he doesn't have a slide in the second half like last season.

I'm not sure if Burleson's current MLB salary is much more than the minimum. Could Burleson's production/salary ratio be the highest value in the MLB, right now? Considering all the wasted salary/production contracts over the years for the Cardinals. Burleson appears to be a tremendous value. He's heading for a much higher, much deserved, payday.

Remember to switch accounts when you quote yourself.

He’s not even the best value on the cards. He makes more than Winn and liberatore

So what? Burleson is THE best hitter on the team right now. Who's better?

Your premise was he’s the best value in the league thundercunt. I gave two better values on the cards. Scouty gave you one on the cubs.

de la Cruz makes less than your man crush. My god you are dumb. Crawl away from this thread and pretend it never happened.

First of all he didn’t say he was the best value, but ASKED IF HE COULD BE THE BEST VALUE. If you find this question to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you find this respinse to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you are referring to me. I just wanted to try to rectify your ignorance. The other gentleman just exhibits common sense. Something lacking in many screwballs here.

Lol how drunk are you cuz you're getting your alt accounts all sorts of confused on this thread.

That deranged thinking and persistent accusations may have gotten some others banned. Just sayin'. This is intended to be a baseball discussion board. Not a soap opera.

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:13 pm

3dender wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:10 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 23:06 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 22:35 pm

ElliottG wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 20:52 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:59 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:55 pm

Absolut wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:51 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 19:39 pm

Shady wrote: ↑05 Jul 2025 18:21 pm Only with a a higher batting average and a higher OPS. Also, considering his defensive progress. The 26 tear old is having a stellar season. He, currently, is a very good value for the St. Louis Cardinals. Just hope he doesn't have a slide in the second half like last season.

I'm not sure if Burleson's current MLB salary is much more than the minimum. Could Burleson's production/salary ratio be the highest value in the MLB, right now? Considering all the wasted salary/production contracts over the years for the Cardinals. Burleson appears to be a tremendous value. He's heading for a much higher, much deserved, payday.

Remember to switch accounts when you quote yourself.

He’s not even the best value on the cards. He makes more than Winn and liberatore

So what? Burleson is THE best hitter on the team right now. Who's better?

Your premise was he’s the best value in the league thundercunt. I gave two better values on the cards. Scouty gave you one on the cubs.

de la Cruz makes less than your man crush. My god you are dumb. Crawl away from this thread and pretend it never happened.

First of all he didn’t say he was the best value, but ASKED IF HE COULD BE THE BEST VALUE. If you find this question to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you find this respinse to be offensive or beneath you, why can’t you simply ignore it?

If you are referring to me. I just wanted to try to rectify your ignorance. The other gentleman just exhibits common sense. Something lacking in many screwballs here.

Lol how drunk are you cuz you're getting your alt accounts all sorts of confused on this thread.

That deranged thinking and persistent accusations may have gotten some others banned. Just sayin'. This is intended to be a baseball discussion board. Not a soap opera.