More likely “selling while high.”mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1301
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
33-35yr old (canine-fertilizer) SP’s aren’t aligned with a youth movement OR a winning team.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 08:52 amHe wasn't moved because he was #1 cheap and #2 Mo is reactive instead of proactive. They decided it was easier to get through the rebuild with him. They were expecting to lose this season.Goldfan wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 08:45 amExactly he had value….was old…..was cheap….perfect chip to use. BDW/MO NEVER ahead of the gamemattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
I can see no taker for Miles/Matz. Miles should have been DFA’d….better options
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
The Cardinals don't do that, and as a rule Cards Talk doesn't either. If you were to suggest trading Burleson right now they would howl and howl. They would hold onto him until he was in the funk that Nootbaar has been in and lament that you can't trade him now because "he has no value".2ninr wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 06:18 amWhen's the last time the Cardinals " sold high " ?mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
To the original post- I hope for your sake you are just venting. You know the Cardinals aren't going to DFA either one of those guys, right?
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Everyone knows Mikolas is cooked.
Regarding Fedde -
“He’ll bring more at the deadline from a desperate team!”
Said many dumb people.
Regarding Fedde -
“He’ll bring more at the deadline from a desperate team!”
Said many dumb people.
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
2ninr wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 06:18 amWhen's the last time the Cardinals " sold high " ?mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiringc him.
Never.
Alex Reyes
O’Neill
Carlson
To name a few
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Kent Bottenfield2ninr wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 06:18 amWhen's the last time the Cardinals " sold high " ?mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
Actually it was probably Brett Wallace.
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Ole Brett Wallace…..the next NL hitting champion….Futuregm2 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 10:06 amKent Bottenfield2ninr wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 06:18 amWhen's the last time the Cardinals " sold high " ?mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
Actually it was probably Brett Wallace.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1801
- Joined: 23 May 2024 15:33 pm
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
That was said and it was pointed out that he'd have to remain healthy and effective for that to happen. And the same discussion was had about Helsley.
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
How bout Zack Cox for Edward Mujica as a deep cutFuturegm2 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 10:06 amKent Bottenfield2ninr wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 06:18 amWhen's the last time the Cardinals " sold high " ?mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
Actually it was probably Brett Wallace.

-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11853
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
If Mo can find a taker for Mikolas and if he won't waive his NTC, then it's bullpen or DFA.
Fedde, what the heck has happened his last two starts?
Prior to that, previous 9 GS:
2.81 ERA
Is he hiding an injury?
Why hasn't D. Blake fixed whatever has gone wrong?
Hit the video room Erick
Fedde, what the heck has happened his last two starts?
Prior to that, previous 9 GS:
2.81 ERA
Is he hiding an injury?
Why hasn't D. Blake fixed whatever has gone wrong?
Hit the video room Erick
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Agree on Mikolas Rock.rockondlouie wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 12:27 pm If Mo can find a taker for Mikolas and if he won't waive his NTC, then it's bullpen or DFA.
Fedde, what the heck has happened his last two starts?
Prior to that, previous 9 GS:
2.81 ERA
Is he hiding an injury?
Why hasn't D. Blake fixed whatever has gone wrong?
Hit the video room Erick
As for Fedde? He obviously relies on command and it has escaped him the last two starts.
On the plus side... he would only be owed $3.5M roughly after the deadline.
At that price I could see some team(s) being willing to roll the dice on him?
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11853
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
AgreedCusecards wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 12:35 pmAgree on Mikolas Rock.rockondlouie wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 12:27 pm If Mo can find a taker for Mikolas and if he won't waive his NTC, then it's bullpen or DFA.
Fedde, what the heck has happened his last two starts?
Prior to that, previous 9 GS:
2.81 ERA
Is he hiding an injury?
Why hasn't D. Blake fixed whatever has gone wrong?
Hit the video room Erick
As for Fedde? He obviously relies on command and it has escaped him the last two starts.
On the plus side... he would only be owed $3.5M roughly after the deadline.
At that price I could see some team(s) being willing to roll the dice on him?
Some team will take him for little more than a weak prospect, Mikolas would bring back a bag of balls plus BDWJr will have to eat $$$$.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018 12:39 pm
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
You guys are too pessimistic on Fedde. While not what it once was, there is a market for Fedde. The Cardinals will not have to take any of his money on. The best way to get value for him (and some to the others) is to make a package and include some players that aren't rentals.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: 01 Jul 2021 21:30 pm
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
I agree. But this reset has been another half-[ashed] job by Mo.Goldfan wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 09:29 am33-35yr old (canine-fertilizer) SP’s aren’t aligned with a youth movement OR a winning team.JuanAgosto wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 08:52 amHe wasn't moved because he was #1 cheap and #2 Mo is reactive instead of proactive. They decided it was easier to get through the rebuild with him. They were expecting to lose this season.Goldfan wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 08:45 amExactly he had value….was old…..was cheap….perfect chip to use. BDW/MO NEVER ahead of the gamemattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
I can see no taker for Miles/Matz. Miles should have been DFA’d….better options
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Shelby Miller for a very good 2015 from Heyward. The '15 rotation will still good enough for a SI cover and 100 wins. Back when they could draft and develop pitching3dender wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 11:45 amHow bout Zack Cox for Edward Mujica as a deep cutFuturegm2 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 10:06 amKent Bottenfield2ninr wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 06:18 amWhen's the last time the Cardinals " sold high " ?mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
Actually it was probably Brett Wallace.![]()
Re: DFA Fedde and Mikolas
Not a bad one, although it pales a little since ATL sold him even higher that very next offseason and got Swanson and Inciarte.Mort Gage wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 15:53 pmShelby Miller for a very good 2015 from Heyward. The '15 rotation will still good enough for a SI cover and 100 wins. Back when they could draft and develop pitching3dender wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 11:45 amHow bout Zack Cox for Edward Mujica as a deep cutFuturegm2 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 10:06 amKent Bottenfield2ninr wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 06:18 amWhen's the last time the Cardinals " sold high " ?mattmitchl44 wrote: ↑01 Jul 2025 05:28 am As was discussed in the offseason, the Cardinals mistake isn't going to have been trading for Fedde. It's going to be not having "sold high" on him last winter if there was interest by other teams in acquiring him.
Actually it was probably Brett Wallace.![]()