Either internal development, which never seems to happen, or spending. You’d think the shucking of contracts would precede the expected buy.Youboughtit wrote: ↑06 Jun 2025 11:50 amWhere do they get the superstar power bat and TOR ace to reach the next level? Spending is the only answersikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025 10:05 am Good morning.
No longer a small sample size. 3/8 in, 38ish percent. And Scouty said no assessment could happen till 60 games in. Here we are.
Pitching- solid rotation. About 3-4 runs per game.
Defense- one of leagues best.
Offense. Middle of road. Can’t carry pitching. Not without Walker and Herrera.
Pen. Need 7/8 inning guy other than Matz. For competition purposes only.
Great position based on a perceived reset. Allows us to watch the young development and see winning baseball.
I look at the standings. We are a top 15 team in baseball. At this stage of reset. In a year or two, I see a power.
The alternative is a reset with losing baseball. I’ll take the former.
Enjoy.
60 games in. No longer a small sample.
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11842
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
They put on forced trades and trade Burleson for James Wood and Gorman for Tarik Skubal.Youboughtit wrote: ↑06 Jun 2025 11:50 amWhere do they get the superstar power bat and TOR ace to reach the next level? Spending is the only answersikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025 10:05 am Good morning.
No longer a small sample size. 3/8 in, 38ish percent. And Scouty said no assessment could happen till 60 games in. Here we are.
Pitching- solid rotation. About 3-4 runs per game.
Defense- one of leagues best.
Offense. Middle of road. Can’t carry pitching. Not without Walker and Herrera.
Pen. Need 7/8 inning guy other than Matz. For competition purposes only.
Great position based on a perceived reset. Allows us to watch the young development and see winning baseball.
I look at the standings. We are a top 15 team in baseball. At this stage of reset. In a year or two, I see a power.
The alternative is a reset with losing baseball. I’ll take the former.
Enjoy.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: 06 Oct 2020 15:45 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
They don’t develop power hitters since Albert ot Power pitchers since Gibson. Going to have to be trade or FAsikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑06 Jun 2025 11:56 amEither internal development, which never seems to happen, or spending. You’d think the shucking of contracts would precede the expected buy.Youboughtit wrote: ↑06 Jun 2025 11:50 amWhere do they get the superstar power bat and TOR ace to reach the next level? Spending is the only answersikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025 10:05 am Good morning.
No longer a small sample size. 3/8 in, 38ish percent. And Scouty said no assessment could happen till 60 games in. Here we are.
Pitching- solid rotation. About 3-4 runs per game.
Defense- one of leagues best.
Offense. Middle of road. Can’t carry pitching. Not without Walker and Herrera.
Pen. Need 7/8 inning guy other than Matz. For competition purposes only.
Great position based on a perceived reset. Allows us to watch the young development and see winning baseball.
I look at the standings. We are a top 15 team in baseball. At this stage of reset. In a year or two, I see a power.
The alternative is a reset with losing baseball. I’ll take the former.
Enjoy.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11842
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
About sixty five games in, and now two wins over LAD. Any thoughts. I said 81-81. They are certainly outperforming that.
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
putting mcgreev in rotation is a good start and Pallante could be good piece in BP where he was good couple years ago. entertaining team which is more than most of us expected. One constant is outstanding D. Lets see how rest of season goes.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11842
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
The defense might be the best in baseball. The staff is over performing, but of course we will take it. Pallante pitches better at home. Hes my number five. Four runs five plus innings is a win if 3/4 of the remaining staff performs.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
Cards are 22-14 vs teams above .500
2nd best in all of MLB
2nd best in all of MLB
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11842
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
You said 60 games. In your mind is this a post season team as is.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:34 am Cards are 22-14 vs teams above .500
2nd best in all of MLB
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
No. They aren't in the playoffs today if the season endedsikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:38 amYou said 60 games. In your mind is this a post season team as is.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:34 am Cards are 22-14 vs teams above .500
2nd best in all of MLB
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11842
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
Thank youscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:45 amNo. They aren't in the playoffs today if the season endedsikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:38 amYou said 60 games. In your mind is this a post season team as is.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:34 am Cards are 22-14 vs teams above .500
2nd best in all of MLB
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:43 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
You're welcomesikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:47 amThank youscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:45 amNo. They aren't in the playoffs today if the season endedsikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:38 amYou said 60 games. In your mind is this a post season team as is.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 08:34 am Cards are 22-14 vs teams above .500
2nd best in all of MLB
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 907
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:58 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
You spent more than a few comebacks brother. This team doesn’t quit, which along with its defense is probably the best quality.Horseradish wrote: ↑05 Jun 2025 20:39 pmVery true, but at least they’re showing some fight compared to the last few seasons, already a few comebacks and late-inning runs.
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
Per MLB "Standings" stats the Cards are 19 - 14 vs .500 or above teams. Below .500 teams 17 - 14.
Road record is 14 - 18. IF going to contend need to improve that record to .500 or better especially with the upcoming Dubbies and Brewer series. . Mets, Dodgers, and Astro's all contenders are at or 1-2 games below .500 in road games.
Road record is 14 - 18. IF going to contend need to improve that record to .500 or better especially with the upcoming Dubbies and Brewer series. . Mets, Dodgers, and Astro's all contenders are at or 1-2 games below .500 in road games.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 9510
- Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
And that 19 -14 record vs teams >.500 is 2nd best in the NL!ilcubuffs wrote: ↑08 Jun 2025 11:38 am Per MLB "Standings" stats the Cards are 19 - 14 vs .500 or above teams. Below .500 teams 17 - 14.
Road record is 14 - 18. IF going to contend need to improve that record to .500 or better especially with the upcoming Dubbies and Brewer series. . Mets, Dodgers, and Astro's all contenders are at or 1-2 games below .500 in road games.
Bolds well since all the playoff teams they may face, if they make it, are of course above .500.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11842
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
Now we can add the LAD to our list. 60 plus games no small sample size and LAD.
Assess.
Assess.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 11842
- Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm
Re: 60 games in. No longer a small sample.
Any more assessments.