Re: I thought we were supposed to find out about the kids this year ?
Posted: 21 May 2025 16:54 pm
Thank you for the kind words but I actually believe it is generally unwise for humans to behave like a distractible dog.
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1512475
Thank you for the kind words but I actually believe it is generally unwise for humans to behave like a distractible dog.
That’s your opinion, but you don’t know that.
Strange to see a complainer complaining about other complainers.Bob Kunush wrote: ↑21 May 2025 17:34 pm You got to give it to the complainers. They are consistent. They gripe when we lose and complain about how Walker and Gorman should be in the minors then gripe when we win saying they should play more despite their mediocre results.
Complaining about walker and gorman not getting playing time? Valid.
Exactly. Burleson is Aaron Miles with a little more pop but worse defense to make up the difference. He has no business playing in the outfield either. Don’t care what Marmol thinks about him either, Shady-Guy. There have been many things obvious to the casual fan that hasn’t been to Marmol. Puppets don’t think for themselves.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:32 pmBecause it was a [shirt]ty RBI total to lead the team with, it said a lot more about how bad the team was than it did about Burly… and he still isn’t any good at driving in runs. The fact that Walker has more RBI than him says a lot when his OPS is like 200 points lower.Shady wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:20 pmBurleson led the team in RBIs last season. Did you tout RBIs then? For some reason, many here just poo pooed Burleson's RBI production then.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:13 pmBurleson has less RBI than Walker.Shady wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:11 pmIt doesn't seem like Burleson's .291 batting average should be lumped in with Walker's .194 and Gorman's .177.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑21 May 2025 14:50 pm Here's all you need to know: Walker, Burleson, Gorman in the same lineup (and it doesn't help to have a slumping Arenado as the only hitter in between that sequence) = guaranteed loss
Correct just like every statement on CT, it’s opinion.swatski wrote: ↑21 May 2025 17:06 pmThat’s your opinion, but you don’t know that.
Corny, do you forget who makes out the lineup? It's not you or me. Guess who it is.CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑21 May 2025 19:09 pmExactly. Burleson is Aaron Miles with a little more pop but worse defense to make up the difference. He has no business playing in the outfield either. Don’t care what Marmol thinks about him either, Shady-Guy. There have been many things obvious to the casual fan that hasn’t been to Marmol. Puppets don’t think for themselves.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:32 pmBecause it was a [shirt]ty RBI total to lead the team with, it said a lot more about how bad the team was than it did about Burly… and he still isn’t any good at driving in runs. The fact that Walker has more RBI than him says a lot when his OPS is like 200 points lower.Shady wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:20 pmBurleson led the team in RBIs last season. Did you tout RBIs then? For some reason, many here just poo pooed Burleson's RBI production then.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:13 pmBurleson has less RBI than Walker.Shady wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:11 pmIt doesn't seem like Burleson's .291 batting average should be lumped in with Walker's .194 and Gorman's .177.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑21 May 2025 14:50 pm Here's all you need to know: Walker, Burleson, Gorman in the same lineup (and it doesn't help to have a slumping Arenado as the only hitter in between that sequence) = guaranteed loss
Mo? Apple AI?Shady wrote: ↑21 May 2025 21:36 pmCorny, do you forget who makes out the lineup? It's not you or me. Guess who it is.CorneliusWolfe wrote: ↑21 May 2025 19:09 pmExactly. Burleson is Aaron Miles with a little more pop but worse defense to make up the difference. He has no business playing in the outfield either. Don’t care what Marmol thinks about him either, Shady-Guy. There have been many things obvious to the casual fan that hasn’t been to Marmol. Puppets don’t think for themselves.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:32 pmBecause it was a [shirt]ty RBI total to lead the team with, it said a lot more about how bad the team was than it did about Burly… and he still isn’t any good at driving in runs. The fact that Walker has more RBI than him says a lot when his OPS is like 200 points lower.Shady wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:20 pmBurleson led the team in RBIs last season. Did you tout RBIs then? For some reason, many here just poo pooed Burleson's RBI production then.Futuregm2 wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:13 pmBurleson has less RBI than Walker.Shady wrote: ↑21 May 2025 15:11 pmIt doesn't seem like Burleson's .291 batting average should be lumped in with Walker's .194 and Gorman's .177.blackinkbiz wrote: ↑21 May 2025 14:50 pm Here's all you need to know: Walker, Burleson, Gorman in the same lineup (and it doesn't help to have a slumping Arenado as the only hitter in between that sequence) = guaranteed loss
And, apparently the OP doesn't consider the fact that only 9 guys can play at a time. This isn't the city softball league.
These two posts are spot on. The cardinals showing, once again, how undisciplined they are as an organization.