How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

Rojo Johnson
Forum User
Posts: 662
Joined: 23 May 2024 23:25 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by Rojo Johnson »

It’s funny that ol’ Moe sabotaged his boss’ reset plans by handing out NTCs like they are cheap candy on Halloween. Just means that dumb (child born out of wedlock) never could see past his nose.
thetank2
Forum User
Posts: 4195
Joined: 23 Aug 2018 10:30 am

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by thetank2 »

Rojo Johnson wrote: 17 May 2025 15:55 pm It’s funny that ol’ Moe sabotaged his boss’ reset plans by handing out NTCs like they are cheap candy on Halloween. Just means that dumb (child born out of wedlock) never could see past his nose.
You must be miserable knowing that the Cardinals have a very good starting lineup.
Carp4Cy
Forum User
Posts: 1693
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:38 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by Carp4Cy »

sikeston bulldog2 wrote: 17 May 2025 13:10 pm It’s still a reset: it still takes time. Just think, when they get thru adding in the next1.5 years, two off seasons, we should be a league power.

What happening everyone is playing for the end of year assessment. Competition. In this case brought out the best in most.

The cuts/trades at the end of year will tighten the ship.
Why does it need to take time? Boston went worst to first - twice. In a single offseason. And that's the system Bloom grew up in. We should be a power in 26 if we make the right moves and don't artificially limit ourselves.
Melville
Forum User
Posts: 3240
Joined: 23 May 2024 16:16 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by Melville »

CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
You took no grief from me.
I supported replacing Goldschmidt with Contreras at 1B - in fact, I predicted it the day Willson was signed.
I supported keeping Gray, and Fedde, and Helsey (called for an extension for the latter) - and correctly said Fedde should only be traded at the summer deadline if the team was out of divisional contention.
As for N/A - he refused to report to Houston and there was nothing the team could do at that point.
I supported leaning into Winn, and Donovan, and Scott, and Pages as starters.
Said it was the correct decision to give Walker and Gorman the full 2025 season for further evaluation - and though the team reneged on its commitment in that regard, it remains the right thing to so.
I believe we agreed on these points far more than we disagreed.
An Old Friend
Forum User
Posts: 12490
Joined: 20 Nov 2018 23:31 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by An Old Friend »

riff raff wrote: 17 May 2025 15:01 pm
An Old Friend wrote: 17 May 2025 14:59 pm
kyace wrote: 17 May 2025 14:56 pm
Cranny wrote: 17 May 2025 14:28 pm
An Old Friend wrote: 17 May 2025 14:22 pm
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
It seems that it’s your own fault that you don’t understand what reset actually meant. Tanking was never part of the conversation.
Some posters felt reset meant getting rid of all the high priced veterans and going 100% with youth.
No so.
Truth is they would have traded all three of Gray, Arenado and Contreras if Arenado would agreed to go to Houston and Gray and Contraras would have waived their NTC. The goal was to give Bloom as clean of a slate as possible for 2026 while seeing what they had in the young players in 2025.
Those players told the org very early they weren’t going anywhere. Tanking was never in the realm of possibilities.
It was until it wasn't
So... your argument is that the Cardinals had a strategy to tank for one week? Contreras and Gray both indicated in early November they were staying put.
thetank2
Forum User
Posts: 4195
Joined: 23 Aug 2018 10:30 am

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by thetank2 »

Melville wrote: 17 May 2025 16:44 pm
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
You took no grief from me.
I supported replacing Goldschmidt with Contreras at 1B - in fact, I predicted it the day Willson was signed.
I supported keeping Gray, and Fedde, and Helsey (called for an extension for the latter) - and correctly said Fedde should only be traded at the summer deadline if the team was out of divisional contention.
As for N/A - he refused to report to Houston and there was nothing the team could do at that point.
I supported leaning into Winn, and Donovan, and Scott, and Pages as starters.
Said it was the correct decision to give Walker and Gorman the full 2025 season for further evaluation - and though the team reneged on its commitment in that regard, it remains the right thing to so.
I believe we agreed on these points far more than we disagreed.
Boo hoo hoo.
Charlie Smoke
Forum User
Posts: 243
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:01 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by Charlie Smoke »

thetank2 wrote: 17 May 2025 16:30 pm
Rojo Johnson wrote: 17 May 2025 15:55 pm It’s funny that ol’ Moe sabotaged his boss’ reset plans by handing out NTCs like they are cheap candy on Halloween. Just means that dumb (child born out of wedlock) never could see past his nose.
You must be miserable knowing that the Cardinals have a very good starting lineup.
Aside from 2 sentence "Moe sucks" posts, Blojo's got nothing. Same as his prowess in the sack according to his old lady.
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 772
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by CCard »

ecleme22 wrote: 17 May 2025 13:49 pm
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
Trading gray and Nolan doesn’t equal a ‘tear down.’
Goldy, Arenado and Gray, yes that would equal a tear down. Plus playing Siani in CF. Thankfully, most of the decisions were taken out of their hands. If only they had the coaches Milwaukee has in the minors. LOL
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 772
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by CCard »

rockondlouie wrote: 17 May 2025 13:09 pm
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
I was w/you at 86 wins CC as long as they kept Helsley, Fedde and NADO.

This is a fun team to watch, they play hard and seem to have great chemistry.

Going to the stadium has been fun too, tons of wins and short lines!

I suspect I'll be getting more tix request from customers now that they're winning, bunch of frontrunners. :lol:
Yeah, I mean you don't blow up a team that close to being a playoff contender. It seems their agenda may have change since the team has gone on this streak. Hope it continues streaking.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 9728
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by rockondlouie »

CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 20:38 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 17 May 2025 13:09 pm
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
I was w/you at 86 wins CC as long as they kept Helsley, Fedde and NADO.

This is a fun team to watch, they play hard and seem to have great chemistry.

Going to the stadium has been fun too, tons of wins and short lines!

I suspect I'll be getting more tix request from customers now that they're winning, bunch of frontrunners. :lol:
Yeah, I mean you don't blow up a team that close to being a playoff contender. It seems their agenda may have change since the team has gone on this streak. Hope it continues streaking.
For sure

The St. Louis Cardinals should never be equated w/the Pirates etal who selloff talent because they don't have the revenues to pay them.

Truthfully the return for Helsley or Fedde or whoever might never amount to anything, it's s total c r a p shoot since they're not bring back Top 5 talent.

BDWJr has enjoyed DECADES of 3+M attendance and can afford almost any player in MLB if he wanted to.

Honestly CC if Dewitt wanted to get back on that 3M pace, then he'd ok Mo/Bloom to ADD a piece or two in June/July if they're still in contention.
CCard
Forum User
Posts: 772
Joined: 21 Aug 2024 08:39 am

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by CCard »

rockondlouie wrote: 18 May 2025 09:02 am
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 20:38 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 17 May 2025 13:09 pm
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
I was w/you at 86 wins CC as long as they kept Helsley, Fedde and NADO.

This is a fun team to watch, they play hard and seem to have great chemistry.

Going to the stadium has been fun too, tons of wins and short lines!

I suspect I'll be getting more tix request from customers now that they're winning, bunch of frontrunners. :lol:
Yeah, I mean you don't blow up a team that close to being a playoff contender. It seems their agenda may have change since the team has gone on this streak. Hope it continues streaking.
For sure

The St. Louis Cardinals should never be equated w/the Pirates etal who selloff talent because they don't have the revenues to pay them.

Truthfully the return for Helsley or Fedde or whoever might never amount to anything, it's s total c r a p shoot since they're not bring back Top 5 talent.

BDWJr has enjoyed DECADES of 3+M attendance and can afford almost any player in MLB if he wanted to.

Honestly CC if Dewitt wanted to get back on that 3M pace, then he'd ok Mo/Bloom to ADD a piece or two in June/July if they're still in contention.
Preaching to the choir my friend. It all starts and ends with DeWitt. When you have a chance it's time spend so dough to go to the dance. Once their, you never know.
sikeston bulldog2
Forum User
Posts: 12037
Joined: 11 Aug 2023 16:20 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by sikeston bulldog2 »

The reset is going great

-kids are performing
- Matz and Mik have reasonable trade value
- helsley will bring a haul.

Now- if u cut today, you’d have a hard time doing so. Maybe two players. Now add a stud off-season to this group. Competitive.

Add two- favorites.
rockondlouie
Forum User
Posts: 9728
Joined: 23 May 2024 12:41 pm

Re: How's that "reset" (tanking) looking right now?

Post by rockondlouie »

CCard wrote: 19 May 2025 09:05 am
rockondlouie wrote: 18 May 2025 09:02 am
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 20:38 pm
rockondlouie wrote: 17 May 2025 13:09 pm
CCard wrote: 17 May 2025 13:00 pm I took a lot of grief from some for saying an 84 win team should be bolstered, not discarded. Lest we not forget, Arenado was basically traded to Houston and he put the kibosh on it. And the Sonny Gray showcase was shutdown immediately by Gray himself. This is really got to aggravate the ownership that was pushing for a tear down. Let's hope they see the error of their ways. But...but...but...Milwaukee has all those coaches! :lol:
I was w/you at 86 wins CC as long as they kept Helsley, Fedde and NADO.

This is a fun team to watch, they play hard and seem to have great chemistry.

Going to the stadium has been fun too, tons of wins and short lines!

I suspect I'll be getting more tix request from customers now that they're winning, bunch of frontrunners. :lol:
Yeah, I mean you don't blow up a team that close to being a playoff contender. It seems their agenda may have change since the team has gone on this streak. Hope it continues streaking.
For sure

The St. Louis Cardinals should never be equated w/the Pirates etal who selloff talent because they don't have the revenues to pay them.

Truthfully the return for Helsley or Fedde or whoever might never amount to anything, it's s total c r a p shoot since they're not bring back Top 5 talent.

BDWJr has enjoyed DECADES of 3+M attendance and can afford almost any player in MLB if he wanted to.

Honestly CC if Dewitt wanted to get back on that 3M pace, then he'd ok Mo/Bloom to ADD a piece or two in June/July if they're still in contention.
Preaching to the choir my friend. It all starts and ends with DeWitt. When you have a chance it's time spend so dough to go to the dance. Once their, you never know.
:wink:
Post Reply