STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1511749
THISOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
Where is all this great deep minor league pitching we hear about?Goldfan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:51 pmTHISOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
Who was the rag arm they gave the ball at resumption of game? Where is all this great deep minor league pitching we hear about?
TLR would have held back Liberatore and started one of the relievers due to the certainty of an early rain delay. He did this to Dusty and the cubs and it worked perfectly. Liberatore would have come in after the delay and pitched nearly the rest of the game.
Cards are 3-0 vs Skenes. Can this continue?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:53 pm I think we get Skenes middle gane of Rats series. Good -it’s at home. Bad -Skenes pitched bad today. Does he atone.
Bad karma. Skenes off a bad game and he is due against us.12xu wrote: ↑02 May 2025 07:47 amCards are 3-0 vs Skenes. Can this continue?sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:53 pm I think we get Skenes middle gane of Rats series. Good -it’s at home. Bad -Skenes pitched bad today. Does he atone.
You've just described the entire NLC, not counting the can't-score Pirates.The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY Mets
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Code: Select all
Cubs 21 11 .650 2 games better
Reds 20 12 .619 3
Brewers 18 14 .550 2
Cardinals 16 16 .506 2
Pirates 12 20 .367 0Your bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Yea, road is a different animal, especially this year. I wouldn’t say I’m “giddy” about a four game split at Cincinnati, but it’s certainly good enough. Now take 2 of 3 from the Mets and we’d be 6-4 over our last 10.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:02 amYour bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Had it been at home, I see your miff.
the top two rated pitchers ( Matthews & Hence ) are both out of action with injuries... so that's where they are since you asked but am quite sure you already know that.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 21:47 pmWhere is all this great deep minor league pitching we hear about?Goldfan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:51 pmTHISOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
Who was the rag arm they gave the ball at resumption of game? Where is all this great deep minor league pitching we hear about?
Futuregm2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:25 amYea, road is a different animal, especially this year. I wouldn’t say I’m “giddy” about a four game split at Cincinnati, but it’s certainly good enough. Now take 2 of 3 from the Mets and we’d be 6-4 over our last 10.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:02 amYour bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Had it been at home, I see your miff.
Mets split with Washington on the road recently and lost 2 of 3 to the Twins on the road. Anything can happen.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:50 amFuturegm2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:25 amYea, road is a different animal, especially this year. I wouldn’t say I’m “giddy” about a four game split at Cincinnati, but it’s certainly good enough. Now take 2 of 3 from the Mets and we’d be 6-4 over our last 10.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:02 amYour bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Had it been at home, I see your miff.
2 of 3 from the Mutts.
Cardinals are 10-5 at Busch and slashing .289 .360 .449 .809.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:50 amFuturegm2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:25 amYea, road is a different animal, especially this year. I wouldn’t say I’m “giddy” about a four game split at Cincinnati, but it’s certainly good enough. Now take 2 of 3 from the Mets and we’d be 6-4 over our last 10.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:02 amYour bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Had it been at home, I see your miff.
2 of 3 from the Mutts.
).rockondlouie wrote: ↑02 May 2025 11:06 amCardinals are 10-5 at Busch and slashing .289 .360 .449 .809.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:50 amFuturegm2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:25 amYea, road is a different animal, especially this year. I wouldn’t say I’m “giddy” about a four game split at Cincinnati, but it’s certainly good enough. Now take 2 of 3 from the Mets and we’d be 6-4 over our last 10.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:02 amYour bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Had it been at home, I see your miff.
2 of 3 from the Mutts.
Mutts are only .500 on the road at 8-8 and slashing .239 .320 .408 .728
I'll say Cards take 2/3 (only reason no sweep is I want to save one win for the Blues tonight
Well I got my Blues win, you got yourscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 15:57 pmrockondlouie wrote: ↑02 May 2025 11:06 amCardinals are 10-5 at Busch and slashing .289 .360 .449 .809.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:50 amFuturegm2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:25 amYea, road is a different animal, especially this year. I wouldn’t say I’m “giddy” about a four game split at Cincinnati, but it’s certainly good enough. Now take 2 of 3 from the Mets and we’d be 6-4 over our last 10.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:02 amYour bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Had it been at home, I see your miff.
2 of 3 from the Mutts.
Mutts are only .500 on the road at 8-8 and slashing .239 .320 .408 .728
I'll say Cards take 2/3 (only reason no sweep is I want to save one win for the Blues tonight
as the Cardinals reeked. 
Like the Cards, can't win on the road. Blues are done Sunday. May the 4 th be with yourockondlouie wrote: ↑03 May 2025 08:44 amWell I got my Blues win, you got yourscoutyjones2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 15:57 pmrockondlouie wrote: ↑02 May 2025 11:06 amCardinals are 10-5 at Busch and slashing .289 .360 .449 .809.scoutyjones2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:50 amFuturegm2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:25 amYea, road is a different animal, especially this year. I wouldn’t say I’m “giddy” about a four game split at Cincinnati, but it’s certainly good enough. Now take 2 of 3 from the Mets and we’d be 6-4 over our last 10.sikeston bulldog2 wrote: ↑02 May 2025 09:02 amYour bullish. Id again counter on the road a four gane split is great. Shows .500 on the road. That’s a huge upgrade.Ozziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:46 pmYea the lowly reds are going up as a franchise and Dewitt and Mo are dragging the cardinals down to where to the reds used to be where fans are happy if they just manage to split a series with a team over .500.ramfandan wrote: ↑01 May 2025 18:30 pmNobody is giddy . The Reds happen to have a better run differntial than all but two teams in the NL.. the Cubs & NY MetsOzziesfan41 wrote: ↑01 May 2025 15:56 pm Its a sad sorry dark state of affairs in cardinal fandom when fans are giddy about a series split with the freaking reds. This is what Mo and Oli has reduced people to
163 runs scored with 126 runs allowed a +37 Checking the espected W-L record for that +37 shows a record of 20-12
which is 3 games better than their 17-15 actual record.
Had it been at home, I see your miff.
2 of 3 from the Mutts.
Mutts are only .500 on the road at 8-8 and slashing .239 .320 .408 .728
I'll say Cards take 2/3 (only reason no sweep is I want to save one win for the Blues tonight