Re: Game today . . .
Posted: 29 Mar 2025 22:09 pm
Gaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
STLtoday.com Forums
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/
https://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=1510458
Gaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
Yes, really. You literally tried to tell people they didn't see/hear what they saw and heard - basically the definition of gaslighting. And yeah, you're a joke.Cranny wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 22:09 pmGaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
Thanks, parrot. Sure do appreciate your message. What I actually said was the people in my section were excited and cheering for the Clydesdales, HOFers, Cardinal players, etc. No booing. Never said that others didn’t hear it. Especially people on CT. But carry on with your agenda.AnExParrot wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 08:06 amYes, really. You literally tried to tell people they didn't see/hear what they saw and heard - basically the definition of gaslighting. And yeah, you're a joke.Cranny wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 22:09 pmGaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
Here is what you actually said:Cranny wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:02 amThanks, parrot. Sure do appreciate your message. What I actually said was the people in my section were excited and cheering for the Clydesdales, HOFers, Cardinal players, etc. No booing. Never said that others didn’t hear it. Especially people on CT. But carry on with your agenda.AnExParrot wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 08:06 amYes, really. You literally tried to tell people they didn't see/hear what they saw and heard - basically the definition of gaslighting. And yeah, you're a joke.Cranny wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 22:09 pmGaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
This is going to be a problem and the norm unless this team really wins and is exciting.
Winning cures all. If they continue to play the way they played the last 3 games the crowds will come. I don’t see it as a “problem” though, it’s not like our wins mean less if they play in front of 20,000 than if they play in front of 40,000. But either way, keep playing like they did vs the Twins and the crowds will be following in short order.
Yup, that^ is gaslighting.OldRed wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:26 amHere is what you actually said:Cranny wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:02 amThanks, parrot. Sure do appreciate your message. What I actually said was the people in my section were excited and cheering for the Clydesdales, HOFers, Cardinal players, etc. No booing. Never said that others didn’t hear it. Especially people on CT. But carry on with your agenda.AnExParrot wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 08:06 amYes, really. You literally tried to tell people they didn't see/hear what they saw and heard - basically the definition of gaslighting. And yeah, you're a joke.Cranny wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 22:09 pmGaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
by Cranny » 27 Mar 2025 16:31 pm
At the ballpark. Very few boos for the Dewitts and Mo. Mostly cheers.
Yes, very few boos as reported by posters on CT because there were only cheers that we heard in our section for the Clydesdales, HOFers, Cardinal players, etc. Sorry, no "gaslighting" as one poster said. Just a fan reporting whatOldRed wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:26 amHere is what you actually said:Cranny wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:02 amThanks, parrot. Sure do appreciate your message. What I actually said was the people in my section were excited and cheering for the Clydesdales, HOFers, Cardinal players, etc. No booing. Never said that others didn’t hear it. Especially people on CT. But carry on with your agenda.AnExParrot wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 08:06 amYes, really. You literally tried to tell people they didn't see/hear what they saw and heard - basically the definition of gaslighting. And yeah, you're a joke.Cranny wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 22:09 pmGaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
by Cranny » 27 Mar 2025 16:31 pm
At the ballpark. Very few boos for the Dewitts and Mo. Mostly cheers.
I can't believe most of your posts.Cranny wrote: ↑31 Mar 2025 08:42 amYes, very few boos as reported by posters on CT because there were only cheers that we heard in our section for the Clydesdales, HOFers, Cardinal players, etc. Sorry, no "gaslighting" as one poster said. Just a fan reporting whatOldRed wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:26 amHere is what you actually said:Cranny wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 10:02 amThanks, parrot. Sure do appreciate your message. What I actually said was the people in my section were excited and cheering for the Clydesdales, HOFers, Cardinal players, etc. No booing. Never said that others didn’t hear it. Especially people on CT. But carry on with your agenda.AnExParrot wrote: ↑30 Mar 2025 08:06 amYes, really. You literally tried to tell people they didn't see/hear what they saw and heard - basically the definition of gaslighting. And yeah, you're a joke.Cranny wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 22:09 pmGaslight? Really? LOL. What a joke.AnExParrot wrote: ↑29 Mar 2025 21:58 pmAnd tried to gaslight anyone who was at the game or watched on t.v. - don't forget that part.
by Cranny » 27 Mar 2025 16:31 pm
At the ballpark. Very few boos for the Dewitts and Mo. Mostly cheers.
he saw and heard on opening day. A magical day and a great win for the Cardinals.