Stanford 78 SLU 77

Attention Billikens fans:
Got an opinion about the Billikens? Let's hear it.
[Complete SLU coverage on STLtoday.com]

Moderator: STLtoday Forum Moderators

Post Reply
Whatashame
Forum User
Posts: 3829
Joined: 24 May 2018 20:27 pm

Stanford 78 SLU 77

Post by Whatashame »

The Billikins had an 11 point lead at the half. They were up by as much as 15 points. Had a 4 point lead with 20 seconds to go and had a 3 point lead with 5 seconds to play.

Decided to foul instead of letting Stanford shoot a 3 to tie the game. Stanford hit the first FT then called a timeout to set up a second FT miss. Stanford did miss the second FT, got the rebound and threw up a three as time was running out. Of course the three was nothing but net. The player who hit the three……his only points of the night. Certainly was a tough one to lose!!
dhsux
Forum User
Posts: 3991
Joined: 23 May 2024 17:18 pm

Re: Stanford 78 SLU 77

Post by dhsux »

Whatashame wrote: 28 Nov 2025 21:00 pm The Billikins had an 11 point lead at the half. They were up by as much as 15 points. Had a 4 point lead with 20 seconds to go and had a 3 point lead with 5 seconds to play.

Decided to foul instead of letting Stanford shoot a 3 to tie the game. Stanford hit the first FT then called a timeout to set up a second FT miss. Stanford did miss the second FT, got the rebound and threw up a three as time was running out. Of course the three was nothing but net. The player who hit the three……his only points of the night. Certainly was a tough one to lose!!
This one definitely got away from the Bills. A bad loss indeed. They should have slowed the game down but.......they never did.

It took 2 crazy 3's for Stanford to cap it off but they did it.
Gymrat79
Forum User
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:44 pm
Location: Lives in Ladue

Re: Stanford 78 SLU 77

Post by Gymrat79 »

Actually up by 15. Hope this isn't the season MOJO !!! :idea:
Rosthol
Forum User
Posts: 11013
Joined: 01 Jun 2018 16:10 pm

Re: Stanford 78 SLU 77

Post by Rosthol »

GRATTY BRINGING THE HEAT.

Up by 15 is correct.
Gymrat79
Forum User
Posts: 442
Joined: 23 May 2024 18:44 pm
Location: Lives in Ladue

Re: Stanford 78 SLU 77

Post by Gymrat79 »

Rosthol wrote: 29 Nov 2025 18:13 pm GRATTY BRINGING THE HEAT.

Up by 15 is correct.
🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
"Whatashame" to be up by 15 and lose.
winonsports
Forum User
Posts: 2357
Joined: 26 Jun 2024 12:49 pm

Re: Stanford 78 SLU 77

Post by winonsports »

dhsux wrote: 29 Nov 2025 07:59 am
Whatashame wrote: 28 Nov 2025 21:00 pm The Billikins had an 11 point lead at the half. They were up by as much as 15 points. Had a 4 point lead with 20 seconds to go and had a 3 point lead with 5 seconds to play.

Decided to foul instead of letting Stanford shoot a 3 to tie the game. Stanford hit the first FT then called a timeout to set up a second FT miss. Stanford did miss the second FT, got the rebound and threw up a three as time was running out. Of course the three was nothing but net. The player who hit the three……his only points of the night. Certainly was a tough one to lose!!
This one definitely got away from the Bills. A bad loss indeed. They should have slowed the game down but.......they never did.

It took 2 crazy 3's for Stanford to cap it off but they did it.
It was more than 2. The one guy was hitting from the parking lot most of the second half.

But don't go overboard. It's just a loss.

There's no such thing as a bad loss to a 6-1 ACC team.
Rosthol
Forum User
Posts: 11013
Joined: 01 Jun 2018 16:10 pm

Re: Stanford 78 SLU 77

Post by Rosthol »

Gymrat79 wrote: 29 Nov 2025 19:08 pm
Rosthol wrote: 29 Nov 2025 18:13 pm GRATTY BRINGING THE HEAT.

Up by 15 is correct.
🔥 🔥 🔥 🔥
"Whatashame" to be up by 15 and lose.
They were up by 15.
Post Reply