Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
the miracle
- Forum User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm
Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
One random observation deserves another.
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
I actually didn't think the Blues played very well at all. Worse than they played in some of the losses for sure IMO.
-
moose-and-squirrel
- Forum User
- Posts: 5980
- Joined: 20 Dec 2020 10:49 am
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
dusting off this sock, eh?
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
I appreciate the snarky thread because of the other one just keep things equal, truth is though we do miss Sunny and Kyrou whether we like it or not.
I've been pretty impressed with Sunny's offensive vision in this (bleep) shoot start of the season. It isn't something I really gave him a ton of credit for but he's looked better in that aspect then previous years. Hopefully, we can string a few decent games together here and keep rotating people through the press box so everyone knows the team can win without them if that is what Monty is trying to do.
I don't think what we did last night was sustainable but I'm all for an experiment to break off the rust we seem to have.
I've been pretty impressed with Sunny's offensive vision in this (bleep) shoot start of the season. It isn't something I really gave him a ton of credit for but he's looked better in that aspect then previous years. Hopefully, we can string a few decent games together here and keep rotating people through the press box so everyone knows the team can win without them if that is what Monty is trying to do.
I don't think what we did last night was sustainable but I'm all for an experiment to break off the rust we seem to have.
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 3951
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Hofer is the sole reason the team got that win.
Joseph was noticeable and a few others.
The big money players were silent, again.
Joseph was noticeable and a few others.
The big money players were silent, again.
-
the miracle
- Forum User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Glad someone appreciates a little humorKilokaai wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:29 am I appreciate the snarky thread because of the other one just keep things equal, truth is though we do miss Sunny and Kyrou whether we like it or not.
I've been pretty impressed with Sunny's offensive vision in this (bleep) shoot start of the season. It isn't something I really gave him a ton of credit for but he's looked better in that aspect then previous years. Hopefully, we can string a few decent games together here and keep rotating people through the press box so everyone knows the team can win without them if that is what Monty is trying to do.
I don't think what we did last night was sustainable but I'm all for an experiment to break off the rust we seem to have.
Admittedly - I haven’t visited the board in several months, I got tired of reading about draft picks/tanking and how much Army blows, etc, etc. After last nights Kyrou benching, I figured there’d be nonstop “I hate Kyrou more than you do posts”, so had to add a little snark.
But, I appreciate your thoughtful post, and I agree. While the end result was good - the Blues really didn’t generate much offense. Holloway and Buch still looked like ghosts out there. Makes me glad Army didn’t take the advice of the group think and offer Holloway 8 million over 8 years after one good season (not a diss on Holloway, but more of a thought that a long term contract for him after one good season seemed a bit premature). Tucker and Kessel (while not the only problems this season), haven’t looked like NHL caliber defensemen at all. Tucker only played 7 minutes last night, and Kessel only 10. I can’t see a future where that’s sustainable.
On the bright side though - Hofer made the saves I would have expected him to make, and I thought Faulk looked good. I can’t see the Blues winning 30 games playing like this, but they won one, and that’s at least a start.
-
the miracle
- Forum User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Totally fair point, and no disagreements here. I know a lot of folks like Tucker, and I will too as long as he wears the Blue note, but he's been terrible this year. It wasn't surprising to me that he only played 7 minutes last night and the Blues were better defensively.
By no means is he the only issue on this team, but its going to be a tough slog through the season if the bottom half of this roster can't be competitive.
-
TruBlueFan_1970
- Forum User
- Posts: 1587
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:32 pm
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
100% true. They looked disjointed against a mediocre Sabre team. They were outshot something like 27-17 but Hofer had a solid game. Against a stronger opponent, they lose playing like that. A win is a win though, so I’m happy about that though.11WSChamps wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:39 am Hofer is the sole reason the team got that win.
Joseph was noticeable and a few others.
The big money players were silent, again.
Last edited by TruBlueFan_1970 on 07 Nov 2025 09:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
the miracle
- Forum User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Hofer looked good - which was a big relief.11WSChamps wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:39 am Hofer is the sole reason the team got that win.
Joseph was noticeable and a few others.
The big money players were silent, again.
I'm on the fence about Joseph. He has flashes where he uses his speed, drives the net, and spurs offense for his line mates that give me hope he could do it consistently and make the Blues third line actually look like a threat. But then he'll vanish for a few games. He was absolutely noticeable last night though - just wish he was that noticeable all the time.
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Mentioned in another thread but the Blues are playing with 3 6th defensemen at the moment. They could really use a 5th real NHLer to help those guys. Mixing up the other pairings to provide that across the pairings hurts their effectiveness and consistency. I said in another thread that someone on 101 mentioned that Tucker having such a good stint and then getting injured really hurt the ability for Army to project his continued success.the miracle wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:00 amTotally fair point, and no disagreements here. I know a lot of folks like Tucker, and I will too as long as he wears the Blue note, but he's been terrible this year. It wasn't surprising to me that he only played 7 minutes last night and the Blues were better defensively.
By no means is he the only issue on this team, but its going to be a tough slog through the season if the bottom half of this roster can't be competitive.
We probably should have entertained keeping Leddy/Suter around in hindsight, but that is totally 20/20 hindsight.
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Joseph plays great when speed and determination are the sauce needed that night. If it is cycling and puck handling he just isn't as good at those, he and Toropchenko are similar players to me but Joseph has a little more shooting touch so he is a good "3rd" liner vs. 4th liner.the miracle wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:04 amHofer looked good - which was a big relief.11WSChamps wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:39 am Hofer is the sole reason the team got that win.
Joseph was noticeable and a few others.
The big money players were silent, again.
I'm on the fence about Joseph. He has flashes where he uses his speed, drives the net, and spurs offense for his line mates that give me hope he could do it consistently and make the Blues third line actually look like a threat. But then he'll vanish for a few games. He was absolutely noticeable last night though - just wish he was that noticeable all the time.
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Someone said the Blues are playing with 3 #6 Dmen..........I'd argue they are rotating 3 #7 Dmen. I like Joseph and what he brings but if he's one of your best forwards on a nightly basis, that does not bode well. Also agree that a win is a win. Felt like we might turn a corner after Edm but maybe it's after this game??? Fingers crossed.
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Sabres are 4-2-4 last 10 so they may be mediocre but are on a decent streak versus our 2-6-2. They are -5 ytd and we are -18.
Blues played well enough to win and that is the key. No team is great every night and no team plays 100% every night. If they can ramp it up enough to win more than 50% of the time we should have a team worth watching- until some major changes are made.
Blues played well enough to win and that is the key. No team is great every night and no team plays 100% every night. If they can ramp it up enough to win more than 50% of the time we should have a team worth watching- until some major changes are made.
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Sunny should play half the time and in playoffs. He's a force when rested. He cant handle every day duty imo.
Keep these guys motivated.
Keep these guys motivated.
-
the miracle
- Forum User
- Posts: 281
- Joined: 24 May 2024 12:14 pm
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
I have to admit, I hadn't considered the game plan (cycle vs speed) as having an effect on neutering Joseph's overall game. I'll pay attention a little more over the coming games. Thanks for the insight!Kilokaai wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:12 amJoseph plays great when speed and determination are the sauce needed that night. If it is cycling and puck handling he just isn't as good at those, he and Toropchenko are similar players to me but Joseph has a little more shooting touch so he is a good "3rd" liner vs. 4th liner.the miracle wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:04 amHofer looked good - which was a big relief.11WSChamps wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:39 am Hofer is the sole reason the team got that win.
Joseph was noticeable and a few others.
The big money players were silent, again.
I'm on the fence about Joseph. He has flashes where he uses his speed, drives the net, and spurs offense for his line mates that give me hope he could do it consistently and make the Blues third line actually look like a threat. But then he'll vanish for a few games. He was absolutely noticeable last night though - just wish he was that noticeable all the time.
-
11WSChamps
- Forum User
- Posts: 3951
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:35 pm
Re: Blues did quite well without Sundqvist
Agree. Joseph is a bit of an enigma and maybe that's why he's still in the league. Just as you said some nights he's a real shot of energy and other nights poof..the miracle wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 09:04 amHofer looked good - which was a big relief.11WSChamps wrote: ↑07 Nov 2025 08:39 am Hofer is the sole reason the team got that win.
Joseph was noticeable and a few others.
The big money players were silent, again.
I'm on the fence about Joseph. He has flashes where he uses his speed, drives the net, and spurs offense for his line mates that give me hope he could do it consistently and make the Blues third line actually look like a threat. But then he'll vanish for a few games. He was absolutely noticeable last night though - just wish he was that noticeable all the time.
I wonder if Montgomery starts Hofer in the next game based on his play last night.