How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Welcome to STLtoday.com's forum for fans of the St. Louis Cardinals.

Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Cards Talk Moderators

DickyBennett
Forum User
Posts: 1145
Joined: 03 Jun 2024 08:57 am

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by DickyBennett »

ramfandan wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
Agree ! This 'accept a trade or be benched in 2026 as pinch hitter ' has never made sense to me. I think those that want to use a punitive tactic like that do not see the potential pitfalls down the road. I feel that the negative publicity league w would create would steer any free agents away from wanting to play for the Cardinals. Secondly , for the FO to threaten playing time for any player flies in the face of the concept ' the manager determines who is in the lineup ' each game. So if the FO not determining to our manager (whether Oli or someone else that Arenado would be strictly a bench bat ). If Oli is dismissed, what manager in his right mind would take the Cardinal job with that directive. Nobody worth their salt. Only a puppet would do that .
We want future top players WANT to play for the Cardinals not be leary of coming here .
I just feel some are being short-sighted on how this negatively could impact our organization for the future.
I believe Bloom, Arenado , and his agent will resolve this situation. Nado and his agent will expand his list in the offseason and Bloom will 'eat a lot more of the remaining salary than Mo was willing to do ' . Those two things will get another team to bite on Arenado.
The Cardinals are the 4th most attractive team in their own division - FA would much rather player in CHI, MIL or even CIN

The Cardinals have meddled in middle with FA, because the top guys don’t want to come here and BDW won’t pay for the top guys

They have signed (bleep) mid-level FA and been burned.

This whole PR, FA excuse shows how out of touch some fans are. Stop living in yesteryear
imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 465
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

Baseball Savant wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:04 pm
ramfandan wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
Agree ! This 'accept a trade or be benched in 2026 as pinch hitter ' has never made sense to me. I think those that want to use a punitive tactic like that do not see the potential pitfalls down the road. I feel that the negative publicity league w would create would steer any free agents away from wanting to play for the Cardinals. Secondly , for the FO to threaten playing time for any player flies in the face of the concept ' the manager determines who is in the lineup ' each game. So if the FO not determining to our manager (whether Oli or someone else that Arenado would be strictly a bench bat ). If Oli is dismissed, what manager in his right mind would take the Cardinal job with that directive. Nobody worth their salt. Only a puppet would do that .
We want future top players WANT to play for the Cardinals not be leary of coming here .
I just feel some are being short-sighted on how this negatively could impact our organization for the future.
I believe Bloom, Arenado , and his agent will resolve this situation. Nado and his agent will expand his list in the offseason and Bloom will 'eat a lot more of the remaining salary than Mo was willing to do ' . Those two things will get another team to bite on Arenado.
The Cardinals are the 4th most attractive team in their own division - FA would much rather player in CHI, MIL or even CIN

The Cardinals have meddled in middle with FA, because the top guys don’t want to come here and BDW won’t pay for the top guys

They have signed (bleep) mid-level FA and been burned.

This whole PR, FA excuse shows how out of touch some fans are. Stop living in yesteryear
You are half right. BDW won't pay for the top guys. That's why high-end FAs don't come here. If the Cardinals offered the top free agents the top offers, they would come here more often than not.
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10162
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by Cusecards »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:43 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
I don't even think it has to do with what other players think. It's just a level of professionalism that I hope they will hold themselves to. Arenado's welcome has worn out simply because of his level of play has dropped off considerably, and he's owned that.

He hasn't had any negative issues off the field, he hasn't had any reported issues in the clubhouse. One can bring up his leadership, but the Cardinals knew what they were getting when they traded for him.

In other words, he has comported himself as a good member of the organization. So, there is no reason to take any sort of negative tone on his way out.
One on one and professional.
Keep the press out of it.
imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 465
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:18 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:43 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
I don't even think it has to do with what other players think. It's just a level of professionalism that I hope they will hold themselves to. Arenado's welcome has worn out simply because of his level of play has dropped off considerably, and he's owned that.

He hasn't had any negative issues off the field, he hasn't had any reported issues in the clubhouse. One can bring up his leadership, but the Cardinals knew what they were getting when they traded for him.

In other words, he has comported himself as a good member of the organization. So, there is no reason to take any sort of negative tone on his way out.
One on one and professional.
Keep the press out of it.
It's just a good way to do business. There is absolutely no reason to be play tough guy and burn a bridge. It just doesn't serve any purpose other than feeding the sharks.

If Arenado were to start trashing the organization, then I could understand taking a harder stance, although I'd still rather they take the professional high-road.
DickyBennett
Forum User
Posts: 1145
Joined: 03 Jun 2024 08:57 am

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by DickyBennett »

Machado and Jose Ramirez are Cooperstown bound, still producing at a very high level

Arenado has probably gagged his way out of HOF with his massive drop off last 3 seasons

He needs more counting numbers to accumulate more WAR

Houston was the ideal fit with Crawford boxes and he passed, a decision he will regret forever
hmoss859
Forum User
Posts: 491
Joined: 24 Mar 2025 23:30 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by hmoss859 »

Arenado was Cooperstown bound until his last 3 seasons

2.2 WAR
2.9
0.9

Massive drop off

He had averaged around 5 WAR per season for career thru 2022

He had it in his grasp and somehow couldn’t finish the deal

He needs a change of scenery with a short LF porch

All it takes is one team to want him
RunSup
Forum User
Posts: 3128
Joined: 07 Dec 2022 19:08 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by RunSup »

Does he want to finish his career in Colorado? He'd go into the HoF as a Rockie. How many hall of famers do the Rockies have? Also the fans still love him there just from the applause when the Cardinals were there a little bit ago.

The Cardinals give most of the money back that the Rockies have been kicking in from the original deal.

Nado gets some playing time and plays in a hitters park to close out his career. This is a win-win-win.

I agree he's coming off the bench and a defensive replacement going forward with the Cardinals. That ought to be clearly communicated.
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 4358
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by Cardinals4Life »

Baseball Savant wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:40 pm He won't sit, he will somehow find a team, he is not a HOF right now and he needs 2 more years of counting numbers.
He better have 2 years of better numbers than these!!! Lol
Cusecards
Forum User
Posts: 10162
Joined: 16 Apr 2022 08:59 am

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by Cusecards »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:24 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:18 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:43 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
I don't even think it has to do with what other players think. It's just a level of professionalism that I hope they will hold themselves to. Arenado's welcome has worn out simply because of his level of play has dropped off considerably, and he's owned that.

He hasn't had any negative issues off the field, he hasn't had any reported issues in the clubhouse. One can bring up his leadership, but the Cardinals knew what they were getting when they traded for him.

In other words, he has comported himself as a good member of the organization. So, there is no reason to take any sort of negative tone on his way out.
One on one and professional.
Keep the press out of it.
It's just a good way to do business. There is absolutely no reason to be play tough guy and burn a bridge. It just doesn't serve any purpose other than feeding the sharks.

If Arenado were to start trashing the organization, then I could understand taking a harder stance, although I'd still rather they take the professional high-road.
Yes
And for the record I wouldn’t expect Arenado to talk trash.
High road is best.
No sense creating a lot of “drama” around the team especially with all the garbage that shows up on the Internet.
Cardinals4Life
Forum User
Posts: 4358
Joined: 05 Nov 2022 18:19 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by Cardinals4Life »

ramfandan wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
Agree ! This 'accept a trade or be benched in 2026 as pinch hitter ' has never made sense to me. I think those that want to use a punitive tactic like that do not see the potential pitfalls down the road. I feel that the negative publicity league w would create would steer any free agents away from wanting to play for the Cardinals. Secondly , for the FO to threaten playing time for any player flies in the face of the concept ' the manager determines who is in the lineup ' each game. So if the FO not determining to our manager (whether Oli or someone else that Arenado would be strictly a bench bat ). If Oli is dismissed, what manager in his right mind would take the Cardinal job with that directive. Nobody worth their salt. Only a puppet would do that .
We want future top players WANT to play for the Cardinals not be leary of coming here .
I just feel some are being short-sighted on how this negatively could impact our organization for the future.
I believe Bloom, Arenado , and his agent will resolve this situation. Nado and his agent will expand his list in the offseason and Bloom will 'eat a lot more of the remaining salary than Mo was willing to do ' . Those two things will get another team to bite on Arenado.
You just described Marmol!!!! Lol
WLTFE
Forum User
Posts: 2174
Joined: 23 May 2024 14:49 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by WLTFE »

You want Arenado gone?... no problem...I know a guy...he'll be sleeping with the fishes...
Pura Vida
Forum User
Posts: 76
Joined: 04 Jul 2024 13:26 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by Pura Vida »

Baseball Savant wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:07 pm Here's what you do.

Chaim Bloom first day as POBO

Nolan, you are not playing here anymore, you can either be traded or sit the bench. Arenado would immediately contact his agent and say get me the heck out of here, his list of tradeable teams would expand over the winter. You will have to eat some salary, but it's a sunk cost anyway.

Who disagrees with this concept?

Yeah, it's hardball, but it's the best way out.
And what, you think other star players will not notice your method of negotiations? Yea lets threaten and throw our past star players out to graze. Talk about a losing dynasty!
DickyBennett
Forum User
Posts: 1145
Joined: 03 Jun 2024 08:57 am

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by DickyBennett »

Nobody cares how Arenado is treated on his way out, where this notion comes from is bizarre. Everybody in MLB knows he has cratered the last 2.5 years, he and his agent should quietly seek a trade in off season, maybe a return to Colorado would be appropo

No big time free agent will consider STL anyway, they are too cheap
45s
Forum User
Posts: 17060
Joined: 01 Mar 2022 20:15 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by 45s »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:08 pm
Baseball Savant wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:04 pm
ramfandan wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
Agree ! This 'accept a trade or be benched in 2026 as pinch hitter ' has never made sense to me. I think those that want to use a punitive tactic like that do not see the potential pitfalls down the road. I feel that the negative publicity league w would create would steer any free agents away from wanting to play for the Cardinals. Secondly , for the FO to threaten playing time for any player flies in the face of the concept ' the manager determines who is in the lineup ' each game. So if the FO not determining to our manager (whether Oli or someone else that Arenado would be strictly a bench bat ). If Oli is dismissed, what manager in his right mind would take the Cardinal job with that directive. Nobody worth their salt. Only a puppet would do that .
We want future top players WANT to play for the Cardinals not be leary of coming here .
I just feel some are being short-sighted on how this negatively could impact our organization for the future.
I believe Bloom, Arenado , and his agent will resolve this situation. Nado and his agent will expand his list in the offseason and Bloom will 'eat a lot more of the remaining salary than Mo was willing to do ' . Those two things will get another team to bite on Arenado.
The Cardinals are the 4th most attractive team in their own division - FA would much rather player in CHI, MIL or even CIN

The Cardinals have meddled in middle with FA, because the top guys don’t want to come here and BDW won’t pay for the top guys

They have signed (bleep) mid-level FA and been burned.

This whole PR, FA excuse shows how out of touch some fans are. Stop living in yesteryear
You are half right. BDW won't pay for the top guys. That's why high-end FAs don't come here. If the Cardinals offered the top free agents the top offers, they would come here more often than not.
Unrealistic…..the cards don’t have the resources to offer the top players the top offers..

You really think the cards can beat 765 mil for Soto?
imyourhuckleberry
Forum User
Posts: 465
Joined: 24 May 2024 20:16 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by imyourhuckleberry »

45s wrote: 04 Aug 2025 19:40 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:08 pm
Baseball Savant wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:04 pm
ramfandan wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
Agree ! This 'accept a trade or be benched in 2026 as pinch hitter ' has never made sense to me. I think those that want to use a punitive tactic like that do not see the potential pitfalls down the road. I feel that the negative publicity league w would create would steer any free agents away from wanting to play for the Cardinals. Secondly , for the FO to threaten playing time for any player flies in the face of the concept ' the manager determines who is in the lineup ' each game. So if the FO not determining to our manager (whether Oli or someone else that Arenado would be strictly a bench bat ). If Oli is dismissed, what manager in his right mind would take the Cardinal job with that directive. Nobody worth their salt. Only a puppet would do that .
We want future top players WANT to play for the Cardinals not be leary of coming here .
I just feel some are being short-sighted on how this negatively could impact our organization for the future.
I believe Bloom, Arenado , and his agent will resolve this situation. Nado and his agent will expand his list in the offseason and Bloom will 'eat a lot more of the remaining salary than Mo was willing to do ' . Those two things will get another team to bite on Arenado.
The Cardinals are the 4th most attractive team in their own division - FA would much rather player in CHI, MIL or even CIN

The Cardinals have meddled in middle with FA, because the top guys don’t want to come here and BDW won’t pay for the top guys

They have signed (bleep) mid-level FA and been burned.

This whole PR, FA excuse shows how out of touch some fans are. Stop living in yesteryear
You are half right. BDW won't pay for the top guys. That's why high-end FAs don't come here. If the Cardinals offered the top free agents the top offers, they would come here more often than not.
Unrealistic…..the cards don’t have the resources to offer the top players the top offers..

You really think the cards can beat 765 mil for Soto?

Where did I say anything of the sort? I said "If the Cardinals offered the top free agents the top offers, they would come here more often than not."

Nowhere did I say the Cardinals could or would make the top offer for a top FA.

I was disputing that FAs would rather play in CHI, MIL or CIN. My point being, location\team preference may be a tie breaker if no real difference between contract offers, but the majority of FAs will, more often than not, take the top offer, regardless of where it is.
45s
Forum User
Posts: 17060
Joined: 01 Mar 2022 20:15 pm

Re: How to get rid of Nolan Arendao

Post by 45s »

imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 19:52 pm
45s wrote: 04 Aug 2025 19:40 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:08 pm
Baseball Savant wrote: 04 Aug 2025 15:04 pm
ramfandan wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:47 pm
Cusecards wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:21 pm
imyourhuckleberry wrote: 04 Aug 2025 14:16 pm While I think the conversation will happen in a more professional, diplomatic way, it will happen.

His list could could\will also change based on who he sees as a contender for the next two seasons as well as who can guarantee him playing time.
More likely.
If Arenado finishes the season weakly and has lingering health issues it only makes sense to move on.
Having said that.....your mention of “professional/diplomatic” rings true. Players talk and the last thing the Cards need is bad PR in regard to the FO which could impact future negotiations with players.
Agree ! This 'accept a trade or be benched in 2026 as pinch hitter ' has never made sense to me. I think those that want to use a punitive tactic like that do not see the potential pitfalls down the road. I feel that the negative publicity league w would create would steer any free agents away from wanting to play for the Cardinals. Secondly , for the FO to threaten playing time for any player flies in the face of the concept ' the manager determines who is in the lineup ' each game. So if the FO not determining to our manager (whether Oli or someone else that Arenado would be strictly a bench bat ). If Oli is dismissed, what manager in his right mind would take the Cardinal job with that directive. Nobody worth their salt. Only a puppet would do that .
We want future top players WANT to play for the Cardinals not be leary of coming here .
I just feel some are being short-sighted on how this negatively could impact our organization for the future.
I believe Bloom, Arenado , and his agent will resolve this situation. Nado and his agent will expand his list in the offseason and Bloom will 'eat a lot more of the remaining salary than Mo was willing to do ' . Those two things will get another team to bite on Arenado.
The Cardinals are the 4th most attractive team in their own division - FA would much rather player in CHI, MIL or even CIN

The Cardinals have meddled in middle with FA, because the top guys don’t want to come here and BDW won’t pay for the top guys

They have signed (bleep) mid-level FA and been burned.

This whole PR, FA excuse shows how out of touch some fans are. Stop living in yesteryear
You are half right. BDW won't pay for the top guys. That's why high-end FAs don't come here. If the Cardinals offered the top free agents the top offers, they would come here more often than not.
Unrealistic…..the cards don’t have the resources to offer the top players the top offers..

You really think the cards can beat 765 mil for Soto?

Where did I say anything of the sort? I said "If the Cardinals offered the top free agents the top offers, they would come here more often than not."

Nowhere did I say the Cardinals could or would make the top offer for a top FA.

I was disputing that FAs would rather play in CHI, MIL or CIN. My point being, location\team preference may be a tie breaker if no real difference between contract offers, but the majority of FAs will, more often than not, take the top offer, regardless of where it is.
Ok….see where you were going…..and I agree

“It’s about the money, it’s always about the money”………..Lance Berkman
Post Reply