A trade for a forward is interesting. That's a rough contract to take on, though. Price is fine, term is scary. Would be a good fit on the roster for sure.
Leddy on waivers
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
Re: Leddy on waivers
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 679
- Joined: 28 Jun 2022 14:38 pm
Re: Leddy on waivers
Someone remind me again. I know if another team claims him, that team pays his salary. If unclaimed, what happens salary wise for the Blues? Is the last year of his contract voided or does he get sent to the AHL, paid the same, but it doesn't count against the cap?
Re: Leddy on waivers
Re: Leddy on waivers
Depends.stlblues1979 wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:33 am Someone remind me again. I know if another team claims him, that team pays his salary. If unclaimed, what happens salary wise for the Blues? Is the last year of his contract voided or does he get sent to the AHL, paid the same, but it doesn't count against the cap?
If unclaimed we would still be on the hook for the whole thing. Unless we have it worked out for a mutual contract termination like we did with Saad.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Leddy on waivers
Army just said Mailloux will play and the Blues may not want to lose Tucker or Kessel thru waivers so this was obvious move
Fowler Parayko
Broberg Faulk
Tucker Mailloux/Kessel
for now
Fowler Parayko
Broberg Faulk
Tucker Mailloux/Kessel
for now
Re: Leddy on waivers
Doesn't necessarily mean something else is Brewing IMO.
I think with acquiring Mailloux Leddy has probably been told we are going with youth and he likely won't be a starter
Fowler/Parayko
Broberg/Faulk
Tucker/Mailloux
However you would think we would certainly be looking to use the cap space if he is gone.
I think with acquiring Mailloux Leddy has probably been told we are going with youth and he likely won't be a starter
Fowler/Parayko
Broberg/Faulk
Tucker/Mailloux
However you would think we would certainly be looking to use the cap space if he is gone.
Re: Leddy on waivers
Man I get the reasoning and each of those bottom 3 guys does deserve a fair shot. But collectively, that's a rough 5-7 D. Lot of potential though!Harry S Deals wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:41 am Army just said Mailloux will play and the Blues may not want to lose Tucker or Kessel thru waivers so this was obvious move
Fowler Parayko
Broberg Faulk
Tucker Mailloux/Kessel
for now
Re: Leddy on waivers
I would call it more "unproven" than rough. Could be very very good IMO.sdaltons wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:46 amMan I get the reasoning and each of those bottom 3 guys does deserve a fair shot. But collectively, that's a rough 5-7 D. Lot of potential though!Harry S Deals wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:41 am Army just said Mailloux will play and the Blues may not want to lose Tucker or Kessel thru waivers so this was obvious move
Fowler Parayko
Broberg Faulk
Tucker Mailloux/Kessel
for now
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 578
- Joined: 23 May 2024 16:17 pm
Re: Leddy on waivers
Isn't Nick Perbix still unsigned? Given inevitable injuries still probably need another nhl dman. Edit, nevermind. Missed Nashville signing.
Last edited by IsDurbanodoingtime on 02 Jul 2025 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Leddy on waivers
Shout out to Nick for being a solid warrior for the Blues.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Leddy on waivers
If Leddy clears he can be insurance in AHL I think this is where the Blues want to be. Tucker looked pretty good to me vs the Jets and they are apparently going with Mailloux or at least its his job to lose.skilles wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:50 amI would call it more "unproven" than rough. Could be very very good IMO.sdaltons wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:46 amMan I get the reasoning and each of those bottom 3 guys does deserve a fair shot. But collectively, that's a rough 5-7 D. Lot of potential though!Harry S Deals wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:41 am Army just said Mailloux will play and the Blues may not want to lose Tucker or Kessel thru waivers so this was obvious move
Fowler Parayko
Broberg Faulk
Tucker Mailloux/Kessel
for now
I have ZERO issue with the Top 4, strong. They just need Tucker and Mailloux to be able to handle 3rd pair minutes and continue to grow
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1501
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:25 pm
Re: Leddy on waivers
The Joseph/Texier spot on the 3rd line is more glaring to me than the 5-7 d spots right now. Unless they give it to Dvorsky or Stenberg, etc Id like to see Texier dealt and another forward signedskilles wrote: ↑02 Jul 2025 11:44 am Doesn't necessarily mean something else is Brewing IMO.
I think with acquiring Mailloux Leddy has probably been told we are going with youth and he likely won't be a starter
Fowler/Parayko
Broberg/Faulk
Tucker/Mailloux
However you would think we would certainly be looking to use the cap space if he is gone.
Re: Leddy on waivers
That assumes he will go to the AHL. Many veterans essentially refuse and terminate their own contract for a shot elsewhere. Basically what happened with Saad
Re: Leddy on waivers
Isn't waiving someone the first step in buying them out?
Re: Leddy on waivers
Not in this case evidently, standard waivers vs unconditional.
https://www.prohockeyrumors.com/2025/07 ... leddy.html