I read they have multiple guys about to hit IR, so he is expected to immediately get a string of games.
Perunovich for a 5th
Moderators: STLtoday Forum Moderators, Blues Talk Moderators
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 460
- Joined: 21 Aug 2024 10:23 am
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Agreed. Hopes a change of scenery helps Scott P. Blues got slightly more for him from NYI than they got for Burtuzzo.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 13:55 pmWell saidSpacemanSpiff wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 13:51 pm I'd love to see him have success, but I'm not sure he's got the frame and speed to make an impact in the NHL.
Other players have left the Blues to have success, just like players have come here to have success.
Good luck to him.
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
The Cedar Rapids Roughriders have a poster of him proudly displayed in their arena.
Man that game was fun this past weekend!
Man that game was fun this past weekend!
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 379
- Joined: 20 Apr 2022 13:49 pm
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Real question, did you watch him play in the defensive zone at all? We're not missing out on anything here lolblackinkbiz wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 13:37 pmI have a feeling we just traded away another 10+ Goal, 40+pt defenseman.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Did you watch him play?We Went Blues wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:32 pmReal question, did you watch him play in the defensive zone at all? We're not missing out on anything here lolblackinkbiz wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 13:37 pmI have a feeling we just traded away another 10+ Goal, 40+pt defenseman.
"At even strength this season, the Blues allowed just 2.04 expected goals against per 60 minutes (xGA.60) with Perunovich on the ice, according to Natural Stat Trick. This was the third-best mark on the team, surpassing defensive defenseman Colton Parayko (2.5 xGA/60)"
Notably, Perunovich’s 2.04 xGA/60 also outpaces all current Islanders defensemen and ranks in the 89.4th percentile among NHL defensemen.
https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-york- ... son-injury
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 1465
- Joined: 23 May 2024 13:10 pm
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Lou might just see a little Brian Rafalski in his as well. Will be interesting to see what the Isles plan is. All they have to do is get him to shoot the puck, and they will have a decent player.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 187
- Joined: 24 May 2024 17:18 pm
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Leddy must be close to returning or they are bringing Kessel back.
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
And then he'll be placed on waiversArmy's Mom wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:22 pm I read they have multiple guys about to hit IR, so he is expected to immediately get a string of games.
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Perunovich played sheltered minutes with very few defensive zone starts when he did play so I don't buy that. He's also been looked over by 3 head coaches now. I hope he does well in New York, but it was time to let him go.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:35 pmDid you watch him play?We Went Blues wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:32 pmReal question, did you watch him play in the defensive zone at all? We're not missing out on anything here lolblackinkbiz wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 13:37 pmI have a feeling we just traded away another 10+ Goal, 40+pt defenseman.
"At even strength this season, the Blues allowed just 2.04 expected goals against per 60 minutes (xGA.60) with Perunovich on the ice, according to Natural Stat Trick. This was the third-best mark on the team, surpassing defensive defenseman Colton Parayko (2.5 xGA/60)"
Notably, Perunovich’s 2.04 xGA/60 also outpaces all current Islanders defensemen and ranks in the 89.4th percentile among NHL defensemen.
https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-york- ... son-injury
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Do you think the Blues weren't aware of these stats? The eye test showed he was a subpar defender to put it lightly and any stat that says he is better than Parayko at anything defensive is suspect in and of itself. He has some skill (decent skating and hands) but I will be absolutely shocked if the guy can become an NHL regular. He's a very poor man's Tyson Barrie.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:35 pmDid you watch him play?We Went Blues wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:32 pmReal question, did you watch him play in the defensive zone at all? We're not missing out on anything here lolblackinkbiz wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 13:37 pmI have a feeling we just traded away another 10+ Goal, 40+pt defenseman.
"At even strength this season, the Blues allowed just 2.04 expected goals against per 60 minutes (xGA.60) with Perunovich on the ice, according to Natural Stat Trick. This was the third-best mark on the team, surpassing defensive defenseman Colton Parayko (2.5 xGA/60)"
Notably, Perunovich’s 2.04 xGA/60 also outpaces all current Islanders defensemen and ranks in the 89.4th percentile among NHL defensemen.
https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-york- ... son-injury
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 591
- Joined: 08 Oct 2024 16:52 pm
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Yes you are, just like DA.
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Love that. If you squint, he's mint.MiamiLaw wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 15:17 pmDo you think the Blues weren't aware of these stats? The eye test showed he was a subpar defender to put it lightly and any stat that says he is better than Parayko at anything defensive is suspect in and of itself. He has some skill (decent skating and hands) but I will be absolutely shocked if the guy can become an NHL regular. He's a very poor man's Tyson Barrie.Pierre McGuire wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:35 pmDid you watch him play?We Went Blues wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 14:32 pmReal question, did you watch him play in the defensive zone at all? We're not missing out on anything here lolblackinkbiz wrote: ↑27 Jan 2025 13:37 pmI have a feeling we just traded away another 10+ Goal, 40+pt defenseman.
"At even strength this season, the Blues allowed just 2.04 expected goals against per 60 minutes (xGA.60) with Perunovich on the ice, according to Natural Stat Trick. This was the third-best mark on the team, surpassing defensive defenseman Colton Parayko (2.5 xGA/60)"
Notably, Perunovich’s 2.04 xGA/60 also outpaces all current Islanders defensemen and ranks in the 89.4th percentile among NHL defensemen.
https://thehockeynews.com/nhl/new-york- ... son-injury
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 447
- Joined: 23 May 2024 14:39 pm
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
I almost feel like all the injuries torpedoed his chances with the Blues. The injury issue was twofold. Not only was he not playing, it also shortened the amount of time when he could be sent to the AHL without clearing waivers. I think in hindsight, he probably needed another half to full season in the AHL to take the next step and instead he was forced on to the NHL roster and then received limited opportunities. When he struggled with the Blues they weren’t able to live with the mistakes, because there were other guys at various times playing better, notably Kessel and Tucker. I hope he does well on Long Island.
-
- Forum User
- Posts: 876
- Joined: 24 May 2024 17:50 pm
Re: Perunovich for a 5th
Peru was effective and had decent offensive numbers when playing regular. He's not a big guy and had difficulty against bigger players. He was a gnat. He will be a 10 goal 40 point player with a slightly positive +/-. You could see his confidence growing when he started playing regular. I believe we will have the same kind of regret like the Jake Walman trade. Coaches miss on players all the time. I am a Monty fan, but Saad was starting to heat up with offensive zone opportunities when Monty came in. I don't know if someone in the org was in Monty's ear or he just watched game tape. It was a setback for Saad. Oh well, life goes on.