Futuregm2 wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 14:28 pm
Melville wrote: ↑02 Jun 2025 13:34 pm
hullie wrote: ↑17 May 2025 12:57 pm
ramfandan wrote: ↑17 May 2025 11:23 am
hullie wrote: ↑16 May 2025 21:37 pm
I object. No I strenuously object. If they were losing I would say of course. Baseball players minds are very weird. Very superstitious people. It ain’t broke no need to fix it. Let it ride.
Yes, on superstitious but regarding the ‘if it ain’t broke don’t fix it ‘ .. last year can’t tell you how many times when
Winn was surging and still batting 9th that I suggested hr should be moved up in order.
I got the same response..oh he is comfy at 9th so don’t move him. No
Pressure there just keep him there. Finally after Lord knows how long
Winn was moved up.
Actually one could argue same thing happening with V. Scott..
Good avg. and top base stealer at 9th
Yes, Noot follows him in batting rotation but over course of 162 games , a team’s 9th batter gets over 100 less plate appearances than the No. 1,2, and 3 hitters in lineup. With 117 games remaining, Scott will get approximately 60- 65 LESS times at the plate.
Bet that means maybe 15 ? Or so less stolen bases and how many runs less ?
Can the Cards still win with Arenado at 4th and Scott buried at 9th? Sure. Buy one must also realize the Cards are sacrificing runs by doing so.
Can’t argue with you about Scott. That guy looks like the perfect leadoff hitter to me too. I would imagine he will be in the near future depending on how the rest of this year goes. I could see him leading off next year.
As I correctly analyzed and advised before the season began, Scott should be leading off right now.
Data proves it.
The team in 27th in MLB in scoring 1st inning runs.
The top 10 teams, on average, score twice as many 1st inning runs as STL does.
Makes zero sense to have the base clogging Mootbaar leading off.
Scott should hit #1, in front of
Winn - putting 2 race horses at the top in front of RBI bats.
Mootbaar fits best at 9 - as I alone explained with perfection before the season began.
Data says I was right all along.
We are 27th in MLB in scoring 1st inning runs because we don’t hit HRs. Nootbaar leads our team with 8 HRs to this point. And he ranks tied for 66th right now in baseball in HRs.
Our club leading 8 HRs is tied with Colorado, Toronto, KC, and the White Sox for the lowest team leading HR total in baseball. Our middle of the order hitters are in the 6 range. Or worse. That is a BIG problem for the team. And has been for the past couple years at least.
Which, of course, proves my point.
Hunting a 1st inning HR is foolishness.
Scott and
Winn at 1 and 2 provides the team with additional ways to score.
Mootbaar does not.
STL in 27th in first inning runs.
What they are doing is not working.
My approach would work - 100% guaranteed.
Remember, in ST when folks were projecting their "best lineup" choice, I was the ONLY person who said
Winn-Burleson-Contreras at 2-3-4.
Everyone objected.
But, as we all now know, I was perfectly correct.
I am right about this as well (and yes, I did say Scott at 1, and Mootbaar at 9 back then).
And I am right now.
Easy.
Obvious.
Correct.