[x] closeYour Web Browser is not fully supported by this site (and many others). Please download and install one of the following: Firefox 3.5; Safari 4; Google Chrome; Internet Explorer 8

JR Live

Blues beat writer Jeremy Rutherford goes one-on-one with readers from 1-2 p.m. Thursday in a live chat.
Thursday, August 5, 2010 01:00 PM CDT

comments & answers

Jeremy Rutherford: Hope everybody is doing well. Let's get chatting ...

Tim: Hi JR,
I would like to know what you hear from other writers and organizations about how they see the Blues this year. Are we a team that other teams will be scared to play and our chances of making the playoffs and making a run at the cup? We are getting close to the end of our rebuilding period, when does JD and Armstrong say "Our time is now, so let's go get 'insert name(s)'?
Jeremy Rutherford: I haven't talked to other writers about the Blues since last season, but most of them thought the Blues were ready to break out last year. A lot of them really like the young core and think they'll be good.

Zac: Hey JR,

Glad to hear EJ signed. Have you heard anything on a possible signing of Ryan Potulny? The guy has some decent offense skills and could help with some offense with Sobotka on the fourth line.
Jeremy Rutherford:
Nothing concrete on Ryan Potulny. He could contribute, I suppose. The Blues have 15 or 16 forwards now after adding Scratchard. So I don't know where he'd fit, but it's worth a look.

stonethrower: Jeremy,

is there any chance the blues may see Vladimir Tarasenko this season? What is the status of his buyout of the russian contract?

Thanks

Stonethrower
Jeremy Rutherford: No, Tarasenko will play in Russia this year. Perhaps you'll see him in North America next year. It still amazes me that the Blues drafted a Russian and we're talking about him playing here one year after being drafted.

Greg: The blues have signed all our restricted free agents, and have said this is the team they are going into camp with. Do u expect this to be the team they start the season with, or do u believe the blues will give in and sigh another quality player? Or if u believe they will sign another player, just not before the start off the season, how far into the season should we expect a player to be signed, or traded for?
Jeremy Rutherford: I do expect this to the opening-night roster. If the Blues sign anybody, it would be minor. The only big move would be a trade, and I'm not expecting that at this point. I mentioned the Blues being interested in trading a veteran defensemen, but with only five of them on the roster, they would have to get a veteran d-man back. So it would be a swap of d-men, in my opinion, if anything were done. Again, don't expect it.

tim_p: Let's be honest, other than the addition of Halak to the club, there isn't a whole lot that I see to be excited about this upcoming season. We basically have the same team, only minus Kariya and Tkachuk, and have added a few unproven AHL players. So JR, is there anyone that you think us Blues fans should really watch out for and be excited about? Who do you think will have a breakout year?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I think everyone should be excited about seeing Halak, as you mentioned. For the role he provides, seeing Sobotka up close will be interesting. Other than that, the Blues obviously didn't bring in any flashy names. But a lot like last year, I think the intrigue will be watching Oshie, Berglund, Johnson, Perron, etc., grow up. Sure, people are tired of hearing that, but with Tkachuk and Kariya gone, there's no excuse for these guys not to take a huge jump this year. If they don't, then there should be real concern.

Matt: Going into this season there definitely seems to be a lack of scoring. ALthough Walt and Kariya were not their old selves, they did combine for 31 goals and 75 points and I was wondering who picks up the slack? ALso, what does our defense look like as far as the three pairs are concerned?

thank you
Jeremy Rutherford: Where the Blues' scoring will come from is a huge question mark. Management did nothing to address this through free agency or trades this offseason. They're going to rely on the current roster to put up points. A lot of fans would have liked to see them add a scorer, but the budget didn't allow it. As a result, there will be a lot of pressure the current guys to produce, and if they don't get the job done, JD and Co. will catch a lot of heat.

As far as the defensemen, we don't know what the pairs will look like. Based on history, there's a good chance you'll see Jackman-Polak, Johnson-Brewer, Colaiacovo-Strachan . . . with Pietrangelo possibily cracking one of those pairs.

Jeff Fahrenkrog: JR:

Thank you for providing this weekly Blues forum as we count down the days to the regular season. Couple questions:

1.) Assuming the Blackhawks bury Huet in the minors / Europe, why didn't they keep Niemi? Walking away from a very reasonable deal for a guy who just backstopped you to a Cup seems like a no-brainer to me. Wouldn't have jettisoning Huet's $5.6MM cap hit created enough cap space for Chicago?

2.) Given our problems scoring goals last year and subtracting (and not replacing - sorry Hensick, Scatchard & Sobotka don't count) Kariya & Walt's 31 goals on top of this fact, does Blues management honestly believe we can score enough to finish in the West's Top 8 teams? If so, their premise relies on a virtual impossibility -- that everything that needs to happen (rise of the kids, Boyes & Backes' goal scoring touch reappearing, etc.) will happen!?! Do you agree that these are very long odds? I just don't know who's going to score more than 25 goals for this team.

Thanks JR...Jeff Fahrenkrog, Indianapolis
Jeremy Rutherford:
1. They can't get away from Huet's deal, other than to banish him like you said. The Hawks' cap problems are WITH Huet's departure in mind. From what I've read/heard, the Hawks didn't want to lose Niemi, but they were forced to following the arbitration ruling. Perhaps they could have moved someone else and kept him at $2.75 million, but they've already lost several players.

2. As I've mentioned, for the Blues to be successful offensively, a lot of players have to have VERY, VERY good years. While possible, it's asking a lot.

Toadstool: Any updates on the search for Jarmo's replacement?
Jeremy Rutherford: Yes, the Blues hired Bill Armstrong yesterday. Armstrong has been a club scout for six years. I posted a story on Armstrong (no relation to Doug) on STLtoday.com this morning.

Hodo51: Hey JR...I saw a couple of weeks ago that Tomas Kaberle was in possible trade talks up in Toronto. I dont think that our current D Core is going to get it done with guys like Jackman and Brewers inconsistant play and Coliacovos history of injuries. Do you think it would be smart for the Blues to look for an offensive Dman like a Kaberle? I have always thought that a good offense starts in your own end with Dmen who can move the puck and make a great outlet pass. Right now EJ is the only guy who fits that description.
Jeremy Rutherford: Kaberle would obviously be a good fit on any team, especially this one. The Leafs are asking for a lot and Kaberle would cost a lot. I'm sure the Blues investigated, but there doesn't appear to be any smoke there.

goldenmouse27: Hello JR: Why is it that the FO of this team each year is infatuated with a "Gray Beard" every year, last year Derek Armstrong this year Dave Scatchard, are these guys going to help this team? Maybe the FO's thinking is that these guys may have one more 20-25 goal year's left. I know they are on the cheap, but this is horrible, they expect to sell tickets to this 1990's show at 2010 prices. I don't understand them not working with Lee Stempniak, give him a base with a ton of incentives that would let him make 3-4 million if he achieves them. This team needs scoring not AARP and Social Security players.
Jeremy Rutherford:
There's really nothing wrong with these signings, as long as they are two-way deals. The Blues know Scratchard's best is behind him. But if he's willing to play in Peoria, and be available to the Blues if they have injuries, why not do it. A guy like Scratchard can also be a mentor to the young playerse in Peoria.

A lot of people would like the Blues to sign Stempniak, but apparently their internal budget won't allow them to sign a free-agent forward.

Zach: Following the Blackhawks salary caps losses, and the Blues addition of Halak do you feel the Blues have closed the gap on them? Which games are you looking forward to on this years schedule?
Jeremy Rutherford: Maybe a little bit, but not much. The Blackhawks' playoff run gave those young players tremendous experience. The 'Hawks have lost a lot of players this summer, but I'd say they're still quite a ways ahead of the Blues.

IL Blues: Hey JR,

Hope you had a nice vacation. I leave next week for Marco Island. Do you think the Blackhawks made a mistake of signing Marty Turco instead of Niemmi? Have you heard if the Blues will have the fanfest again this year?
Jeremy Rutherford: I'm not a big Marty Turco fan, but maybe he'll be better behind the Hawks, rather than the Stars.

As far as I know, yes, there will be a Fanfest this year. Not official, though.

mmusic007: Please give your comments on these forward line combinations (LW C RW):
1. Backes McDonald Perron
2. Berglund Oshie Boyes
3. Winchester Steen Crombeen
4. D'Agostini Sobotka Andranov (3rd round pick 2 years ago)
Reserve: Janssen McClement
Jeremy Rutherford:
1. Backes should be on the right and Perron on the left, but I like the line.
2. I really like Oshie in the middle, but on this line, Berglund would be in the middle, Oshie on the left.
3. I like Steen-McClement-Crombeen
4. On this line, you'll see a combo of Janssen, D'Agostini, Sobotka, Winchester

Ray: JR, Just to put the rumors to rest once and for all (and dash my hopes) there has been a rumor floating around the HF boards and Blues talk board of Tarsenko still having a slight chance of getting out of his contract with his Russian team. Please tell me there is some hope!!!!!!
Jeremy Rutherford: "Rumor" is the key word in that sentence. I've not been told that.

stlbluespower: Hi JR,

So, if the current roster is the one we start the season with (and from all indications it could very well be), where do you think we stand in the conference? I'm really excited, but I think I always set my expectations too high. How excited should St. Louis Blues fans realistically be for this season? Thanks!
Jeremy Rutherford:

I don't think they're a playoff team, unless the offense surprises everyone and the young defensemen play well. If I were predicting the conference today, I'd put them around 10th.

slapperloon: Hi Jeremy,

Looking at the Blues forward corps for next year, I can't help but feel that they need at least one more solid veteran up front. Would you agree that, if this team wants to have a shot at making the playoffs, they'll need to replace some of the veteran leadership they've lost with the departure of Tkachuk and Kariya?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Yes, not only for production, but leadership too. The Blues have some solid leaders at forward (McDonald, Backes, McClement), but I think another guy would help. I understand the point that the young players need some room to grow and might be able to do that better without a veteran guy in the way. But this team is really young. They have to grow up quickly if this is going to work.

Jon: What do you feel this team is lacking to be an upper tier team in this league? Will these gaps be filled by current prospects in the system, or will we have to look outside of the organization in the next few offseasons?
Jeremy Rutherford: They still need a scoring threat, a puck-moving defenseman and more time for the young players to develop.

Jon: Montreal seems to be very big on Lars Eller. Do you think this is because he's going to light the Habs on fire this year, or because they need to believe they got an impact player for Halak?
Jeremy Rutherford: Eller is going to be a good player. I'd be excited about him, too. They have to be thrilled that a late-round pick (Halak) turned into a very good goalie and they turned him into a former first-round pick.

honeycutt: Hey JR,
Any new news regarding Nikita Nikitin? i have been waiting for him to come over for the last couple of years, and wondering what is chnaces are for making the Blues this year.

Thanks
Jeremy Rutherford: Nikitin will be in camp and he's got a chance to make the team. His chances improved with Mike Weaver not being re-signed. But Nikitin still has to prove himself. Remember, he's been playing on the smaller ice in Europe, so there's going to be a transition. My guess is that he'll start in Peoria.

Hamby: Have you seen any indication that Oshie, Perron, Berglund can take the next step into becoming quality consistant producers for the St. Louis Blues?

While I appreciate Oshie's ability to play two-way hockey and believe his stats are not representative of the amount of quality and ability he puts forth, he along with Perron and Berglund are the guys who we are hanging our hopes on to turn this hockey team into a playoff contender in the near future.

While I like the guys and think they have the ability (and hope they do turn the corner), I am wondering if I am too biased towards the Blues and this is just wishful thinking.
Jeremy Rutherford:
It's pretty hard to see any of those indications in the summer. I'll know more in the coming weeks when I visit them at informal practices.

As far as Oshie-Berglund-Perron, this season will tell a lot about whether it's wishful thinking or not.


Kevin: JR, how likely is it that Dave Scatchard makes the Blues out of camp? Teams typically break camp with 14 forwards and he would seem to be the 13th or 14th best forward at this time. Your thoughts?
Jeremy Rutherford: I don't think he'll make the club out of camp. Like many have surmised, he's a Derek Armstrong-type guy who will fill in if there are injuries or sub-par play.

danza.tonydanza: This team again is filled with 2nd and 3rd line players playing out of position in 1st line roles. JD, who is going to score the 40-50 goals needed to win. We dont have a single player who would be a 1st line player for a team like the washington capitals.
Jeremy Rutherford: I'll agree with anybody that this team needs more scoring, but having a 50-goal scoring is not essential. There were three 50-goal scorers last year (Crosby, Ovechkin and Stamkos) and there teams didn't win the Cup.

There were only seven players (Crosby, Ovechkin, Stamkos, Gaborik, Kovalchuk, Semin and Marleau) who scored 40 or more last year and none of their teams won the Cup.

Having said that, the Blues need a scoring threat. It's not mandatory that he can score 50, but they have to have a guy that can be a threat at all times . . . a guy who gets so much attentnion that it opens things up for other guys. The Blues don't have a player like that.

As far as the Washington example, VERY few teams have players who could be on the top-line with the Caps.

sltest: Is Steen a plus 20 goal guy outside of a contract year? Seems to me to be a very handy third line guy, and plays the PP point well due to his all around hockey sense and skill. Not so sure hes a second line guy but his contract says he is, whats your thought?
Jeremy Rutherford: I don't know that Steen is a perennial 20-goal guy, but it's possible. More important is the versatility he gives the Blues: PP, PK, scoring line, stopper line. I believe he'll score 15-plus next season, and 20 is a possibility, but I wouldn't think he can reach 24 like he did last year.

Mark: JR, you wrote the following in your morning skate today in regards to Bill Armstrong: After working primarily as a scout in the Quebec area, eyeing the Quebec Major Junior Hockey League specifically, Armstrong's territory was widened by former scouting director Jarmo Kekalainen.

I find that interesting as I didn't know Armstrong's territory was expanded beyond the QMJHL last season. Just how big was his territory? Where all did he scout last season?
Jeremy Rutherford:
That's something I probably should have asked. Bill just said that his territory expanded. He said that he was asked to go out and see more players. Sorry for the hole in the story.

Matt: Thanks for the chat JR, its always appreciated!

My question is about Brett Ponich.
What are the latest projections for him? Will he make it to the NHL?
I know he's currently at the WJC development camp with some other pretty big names. Hockey's future has him listed lower other Blues defense prospects like Fairchild and Kristoffer Berglund. The description says he needs to improve his skating and stickhandling and could be a "boom or bust" (which isn't much help). Will he be a 5/6 defenseman or a career AHLer?
Jeremy Rutherford: A lot of people like Ponich. He can move around a lot better than I pictured when I first saw him. He's got NHL potential, but it seems a ways off. He'll be back in Portland next season and after that, we'll have to wait and see.

BackesForCaptain: JR, with the likes of Cole, Petro, and Strachan duking it out for a final D spot in camp, is it reasonable to expect Petro to get his shot or in your opinion will Strachan finally be rewarded for waiting in line?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Pietrangelo has a great shot to make the team, but at this point, the Blues will probably rely more on Strachan at the start. He has a little more NHL experience.

Dan Lorentz: JR,

I believe I am not mistaken but the Blues wore their home whites once last year... at home, and it resulted in a win. What are the chances of the Blues/NHL bring back the home whites for more than one game this year? Tired of going to the games and watching Blue vs. White. What happened to the White vs. Red, White vs. Green, White vs. Blue days?

Dan
Jeremy Rutherford: There are a lot of fans who think like you do, but I don't see it changing much, if at all.

forehandbackhandwaterbottle: In what order will the following events happen?

A) Erik Johnson winds up on the point and shoots 4 ft wide and 2 feet high

B) Darren Pang uses the term, "The old nine o' hearts"

C) Brad Winchester scores a goal

D) Brad Boyes breaks a stick on an attempted one-timer

E) Ty Conklin logs time on ice in goal
Jeremy Rutherford:

Panger will definitely pull out the "old nine o' hearts" first.

michelle: Sorry for the ignorance, but how do I see or listen to this live chat?
Jeremy Rutherford:
You're better off if you don't read it.

But if you're interested, go to STLtoday.com and look on the sports page for the transcript. Or, wait for me to post the link to the transcript on twitter.

iowa blues fan: Please settle this for the forum regulars who want to get on with our lifes; Is Cam Janssen a "good guy" or an "attention grabber"?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Cam never met a TV camera he didn't like. I'm just kidding. I can vouch for him being a good dude. He's really sincere when dealing with the fans.

Steve: JR,
If you had to pick right now. Who are the five best teams in the NHL going into this upcoming season??

Also, what do you think is a realistic number of games for Halak to start next year?? Think he will make it to 65 starts (if healthy)?? Thanks
Jeremy Rutherford:
Off the top of my head ....

Washington, Pittsburgh, Chicago, San Jose (especially if they get Niemi) and Vancouver

Regarding Halak, I think I projected him for around 55-60 games next year.

GracieStLouis: Who replaces Mike Weaver this year?
Jeremy Rutherford:

Strickland.

Joking aside, no one. Strachan will have a leg-up on the position, but they're two totally different players. I like Strachan, but I think Weaver will be missed. While he did nothing flashy, he was consistent. His work on the PK, which ranked No. 1 in the league, has to be replaced somehow. Erik Johnson should see some time on the PK next year.

CupInMyLifetime: As always, thanks for your time. What are your views on EJ's contract from both side's perspective? Any chances this might harm signing him long-term if he should break out in the next two years?
Jeremy Rutherford: I honestly thought he'd get more $$, even though he missed a year. Johnson was happy and the Blues were really happy. Keep in mind that he'll still be a restricted free agent in two years, so the Blues will have the right to match any outside offers. As I wrote when he signed, if EJ develops as many expect, the Blues will have to write a big check. But if that's the case, they won't mind writing a big check if he's one of the top d-men in the league.

forehandbackhandwaterbottle: There needs to be a word of the day that everyone adds someone where in their question. What is this week's word?
Jeremy Rutherford: Sounds like a blast.

This week's word: "Jeremy,you'rethebest."

Handy: Who is the better player: Bob Bassen or Tyson Nash? What fun players both of these two are to watch?
Jeremy Rutherford:
A common fish is in the last name of my pick. But Nash was fun to watch, too.

Greg: Most armchair GMs were surprised by the low salary numbers of Johnson’s contract extension. From the outside, without fear of offer sheets, it looks like the Blues waited out Johnson and was arguably able keep his salary down.

"I just told my agent I wanted to get it done," Johnson said.

"I'm extremely happy to get this done and get it off my mind and just focus on camp.”

Perhaps I am reading too much into these quotes, but it appears that Johnson gave in during this game of chicken.

Do you sense any bad blood between Johnson’s camp and the Blues over the contract?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Johnson had next to zero leverage in the talks, so it wasn't a surprise that he would have to accept what the Blues were offering. Keep in mind that Johnsonw as paid $800,000 or so in 2008-09 when he missed the entire year with his knee injury.

I didn't sense any bad blood when the deal was finalized. Johnson was sincerely excited, even after the voice recorder went into my pocket.

BackesForCaptain: The one thing that is a concern for me is the amount of lower-echelon talent that will be vying for 3rd/4th line duties. I know management has preached staying the current course for fiscal responsibility this year and into the future, but will the Blues have a balanced enough attack coming from the back end as they should the top 6 forwards? We all know the team doesn't have that superstar that will carry us, so we need everyone to contribute as they did when the team went on its run in 08-09.
Jeremy Rutherford:
The third line is going to be very similar. I expect Steen-McClement-Crombeen to stay intact. As far as the fourth line, the Blues can't replace Tkachuk's experience, but I think people will like Sobotka. You're right, though, I don't anticipate many goals from the combination of D'Agostini, Sobotka, Winchester, Janssen, etc.

Adam: And if I can go a bit off topic here, where do you see Niemi ending up? Wouldn't you think Washington would be the front runner at this point?
Jeremy Rutherford: Good question. I read San Jose and Edmonton were interested. Washington has a couple of young goalies they like, but anyone would be silly not to give Niemi a look if they can fit him under the cap.

gd25: I don't agree with the signings of both scatchard and Mink ... Thoughts?
Jeremy Rutherford: If all goes as the Blues hope, you won't even see them in St. Louis. Those are depth signings.

willybegolfer: Hey JR, how are ya???

I wanted to get your feelings about the Scatchard signing. Depth and leadership at Peoria or rehab job for a 3rd or 4th line for the big team?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I'm doing awesome, Willy.

Why don't you ask an original question .... hahaha

NHLonESPN: Hey JR,

Are the Blues looking at former Sabre Tim Kennedy at all? For a million dollars he's a fiesty guy that would be a great third line or maybe even second line guy that fits the young mold. He definitely was mixing it up and had Jackman off his game when they played in STL last year. He also had a couple of assists and made a great play on the game tying goal in the third. Its clear that they arent going to sign a big name, why not take a chance on this guy I know fans in Buffalo were sorry to lose him.
Jeremy Rutherford:

That's worth considering since it wouldn't cost much. His arbitration ruling was $1.2 million. But I don't know where the LW would fit on this team. The Blues have Steen on the third-line LW spot. Is Kennedy better than what the team has on the fourth line? Probably so. But they've got guys signed already.

This a shame for guys like Kennedy and Niemi who opt for arbitration. Teams are broke by the time they're available, after teams walk away from their rulings. They should push the dates up for arbitration and the rulings.

Chris_C: JR, How does the organization think that "letting the young guys come into their own" is going to put fans in the seats? I'd like to see them add someone with some scoring punch, because everything they have right now is either unproven, or they took a big slide backwards last year (Backes and Boyes?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Good question, but fans are still coming. If the Blues don't make the playoffs this year, which is looking pretty far ahead, I don't think fans are going to go along with the "wait and see" approach anymore.

Puckhead10: I understand that the NHL team salary cap is $59.4 million for this upcoming season. Other sites that list the status of each teams cap number have a column for "Bonus Cushion" which I believe gets added to that number which allows them to exceed the cap. How does this work? Is the cap a hard number like the NFL or can teams exceed it but face a penalty?
Jeremy Rutherford: (EDIT) This relates to player bonuses. Read further down in the chat for a thorough explanation from a reader.

Mark: JR, someone asked about the bonus cushion - it doesn't have anything to do with teams being allowed to go over the Cap by 10% during the summers. All the bonus cushion is, is that teams are allowed to go over the Cap, even during the season, as long as the overage is in potential bonuses (so we're only talking about entry level contracts and 1 yr contracts for 35+ players) and not guaranteed salary. If those potential bonuses aren't achieved, then nothing happens. If the bonuses are achieved and thus the team ends up paying out more than the Cap allows, the overage is reduced from that team's Cap number the following season. That happened to the Hawks last season. Since Toews and Kane earned a bunch of bonuses, they went over into the bonus cushion by a little over $4M. That's one reason why the Hawks are having so many problems fitting under the Cap this season - they actually have a Cap number ~ $4M less than other teams this season. Also, now that Toews and Kane are off of their ELCs, they don't really have any players with significant bonuses written into their contracts so they don't have much of a bonus cushion to work with this season.

Teams are allowed to go over the Cap as long as it falls into the category of the bonus cushion but to my knowledge, no team had actually used the bonus cushion until last season when the Hawks did so. The Hawks put all of their eggs in the 2009-10 basket and they're lucky they got a Cup out of it as they're pretty screwed Cap-wise now.
Jeremy Rutherford:
The Blues haven't dealt with this, so my knowledge on the topic is limited. Thanks for the thorough explanation.

Zamboni68: JR,

Thanks for your hard work and effort. It is much appreciated.

A couple of questions for you: Have you heard or talked with any players about Donald Fehr taking over as the lead for the NHLPA going into the next CBA? Anything of note to pass along and about that topic? Also, do you think with Fehr coming on board that this will signal that the NHLPA is not gonna roll over like they did in the last CBA and will be preparing for another fight?

Thanks and enjoy your summer, what's left of it.

PA
Jeremy Rutherford:
I don't believe it's official, but yes Donald Fehr (former chief of the MLB players union) is expected to take over for the NHLPA. I haven't spoken to any players about this yet, but I will when the season starts. I don't know what Fehr's hiring will mean other than the fact that the NHLPA should probably have some firm leadership now. What's happened to the NHLPA over the last few years has been terrible.

Even though the owners got what they wanted with the salary cap, I don't think the the NHLPA rolled over. As it turns out, the system has been very good for them. But with more bargaining ahead, it will be good for the players to have Fehr on their side.

hof04: Hey JR,

Anybody heard anything from Ken Wilson now a days?

Also who was your favorite voice of the Blues?

Jeremy Rutherford:
I believe Wilson still lives in Hawaii. If he's not selling pizzas, he's running the Pacific Coast baseball league. If I'm not mistaken, he applied for an NHL play-by-play job recently and didn't get it.

Wilson was great obviously, but I like them all. Even more important, they're all great guys: Kelly, Chase, Kerber, Federko, Pang, etc. They really are terrific people.

IL Blues: Whaat team do you think will take a big step this season. Tampa Bay, Atlanta?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I really like Tampa Bay, especially with Steve Yzerman stepping in.

Joey: Who do you like making the all star game from the blues?
Jeremy Rutherford: If I had a guess, I'd say McDonald.

Keith Johnston: I really liked the Halak acquisition. Still feel we need big and strong d man to clear front of net. Love Jackmans heart but cant compete against the ever growing forwards these days. Also the need for an enforcer was magnified with the contracts given to Boogaard, Scott, Shelley ect. We dont seem to have a heavyweight now with King gone. Do you thimk these are real concerns?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I think Jackman can still be physical and don't forget about Polak. Do they have enough in front of their own net? We'll see. I think Janssen will do fine by himself. If the Blues' only worry was having a true "heavyweight" they would be in good shape. Janssen does fine in that department.

Zac: Hey JR,

I know Jonas Junland has given the chance to play on the Blues this year, and decided to go play in Sweden. Is there a chance that he could evetually come back to STL? Or would he have to sign him again?
Jeremy Rutherford:
The Blues have his rights. They could re-sign him and bring him back to St. Louis.

Tim: JR,

To piggy back on the jersey color question. A few years ago, the Blues and the Wings both came out in their colored jerseys. it was a simple mix up but why can't teams that have good contrast both wear colors for a game or two? Am I the only one that thinks those red hawks or wings jerseys would look good on the same ice as the "blues"

Thanks,
Tim
Jeremy Rutherford: I was at that game it Detroit. It looked terrific with both teams in their dark jerseys. Unfortunately, the Wings changed to their white jerseys.

David: Is there anybody else that is on the Blues' radar this offseason? Maybe another guy on offense who can score?

Also, I know Gretzky was only on the teams for a few months, but why isn't there a banner or at least a commemoration of his number being retired at Scottrade? At least he was a Blue, which is more than most teams could say. I guess I'm wondering because Jackie Robinson's 42 is acknowledged by every team in MLB, including the Cardinals, even though he only played for Brooklyn.
Jeremy Rutherford: Eller would have been the guy to watch, but he's gone. Nicholas Drazenovic is a good young prospect, but he's not going to come to St. Louis and light it up. On defense, you have Pietrangelo, Ian Cole and Nikita Nikitin to watch.

As far as Gretzky, I didn't know that his No. 99 had been retired by the league, but someone has since pointed out to me that it was indeed retired in 2000. If there is a banner at Scottrade Center recognizing this, as there is across MLB stadiums with Robinson's No. 42, then I haven't seen it (which is possible).

Mike: Any word on how the search is going for a new majority investor? Financially, I think the Blues did a lot of good this season in terms of setting up the cap room for the future, while improving the team with the Halak trade. That being said, there is now way we win a stanley cup with $14 million in cap room.
Jeremy Rutherford:
I am working on a story abotu the investor search, but at this point, I have no update.

I agree that the Blues have gotten some pretty good bargains with the last few contracts (Halak, Johnson, Perron). When the team is able to spend some money, they should be in very good shape financially.

simpleton: I disagree about the Gretzky to Robinson comparison. Robinson broke down barriers and had to endure all kinds of taunts and mistreatment to do what he did. Although Gretzky may have been the best offensive player to play the game, that doesn't bring him to the realm of retiring his number by every team. It's not like Babe Ruth's performance caused baseball to retire no 3. Just my opinion....
Jeremy Rutherford: I do agree with that, although it's been pointed out to me that Gretzky's No. 99 was retired by the league in 2000.

Tim A.: Who wins....The nhl or Kovalchuck? If the nhl wins do we see Lou, Kovy, and Kovys agent hit with the actually penalties that are supposed to be assessed for circumventing the cap?

Thanks JR

Tim A.
Jeremy Rutherford:
I side with Kovalchuk on this one, and I think he'll win. His contract is no different than many others that have been approved. This won't change until the CBA is revised.

Joey: What are the chances that Brewer gets traded? He is not a very good player and it seems to me that his mental lapse cost the blues a few goals last year. In my opinion, trading him would be addition by subtraction.
Jeremy Rutherford:
From what I've gathered, the Blues have tried and didn't have any takers.

scottucity: Let's end this chat early. The questions are: Why don't have we enough scoring. Answer: We can't afford it.

Go home early, JR. Take care of the baby.
Jeremy Rutherford: Thanks boss.

I'll answer a few more questions and then call it quits.

Dan: Hey JR, I was watching highlights from last season and Steen's rocket past Brodeur in the NJ Devils game got me wondering: which Blues player do you think has the hardest slapshot?
Jeremy Rutherford:
It's got to be Steen. That's a rocket.

Matt: What happened to Berglund's twitter page?
Jeremy Rutherford: It wasn't very interesting. I don't know, really. I guess he didn't like doing it.

Hamby: Hey JR:

1. In regards to forwards, do you see Coach Payne staying with a group of centers, a group of RW'ers and a group of LW'ers or do you see him reverting to last season where, on any given shift, Oshie could be on the Wing or in the middle, same with Backes, Bergland and McDonald? Do you consider Payne to stick a player in a position and leave him there rather than move him around the ice all the time?

2. What is your take on the Coliacovo/Weaver debate? It has been apparent that only one would stay with the team, and the other would be dealt away. Do you agree with keeping Coli over Weaver?
Jeremy Rutherford:
1. Every year, you'll see players move around. Payne moved guys last year and I'm sure you'll see it again. Eventually, though, the players like continuity.

2. It seems to me that it was a situation of "Who took the Blues' offer first" was going to be back, and Colaiacovo took it first. Cases could be made for both. I really like what Weaver brings, but I'm interested to see if Colaiacovo can take another step this season.

OpenIceHit6: Hi JR

Went out to the informal skate yesterday at the Mills, any idea when the rest of the boys are due in town?
Jeremy Rutherford: Should be any time now. Usually the middle of August, the ice gets packed.

FYSD: This chat is a marathon! Is this the longest ever for you?
Jeremy Rutherford:
No, with apologies to Rick Pitino, I've lasted a lot longer.

Mike K: JR,
Thanks for hosting. Still hoping to hear a legit "WHY?" on Scatchard?
Jeremy Rutherford:
People said why on Derek Armstrong and the guy should have made the team out of training camp. When he came up later in the season, people in the locker room were saying that Armstrong was the presence the team was missing. I'm not trying to convince fans to be happy about the Scatchard signing, but there is a purpose.

gd25: How soon do you see Jaden Schwartz pulling for a roster spot? ... Possibly 2011-2012 Season??
Jeremy Rutherford: I would guess it'll be at least two years before we see him. He's got some muscle to put on.

Joey: We keep hearing that the budget didn't allow the blues to add a legit scorer. But can the Blues really afford to miss the playoffs AGAIN? I would say with the contracts that some 50-55 point scorers were getting this off-season that the serious lack of interest this team is generating is going to hurt the budget more than spending an extra 2-3 million on a legit scorer. It just does't make sense. Oshie, Perron, Berglund, and EJ are going to have to score an extra 20 points a piece to make up the lost offense. Plus steen is going to have to play like his second half to be the same offensive team they were last year, which was a non-playoff team. Give us some insight on why they would put all of the offensive load on the young guys with 1 lone veteran Scorer in Andy Mac.
Jeremy Rutherford:
I agree with you, but who should have gotten? Kovalchuk wanted the moon. After him, who was available. There aren't many legitimate scoring threats out there. Yes, the Blues could have been more active, but it was a lean year in free agency. Trades seem to be the only way to go this year, and who's trading a 30-goal scorer??

TheGoldenBrett: Hey JR, thanks for taking the time to chat. Hypothetically, let's say TJ Oshie has a mediocre year this season...any chance the Blues don't resign him? He seems like he could one day be the centerpiece of this franchise, and might be already, but his number aren't exactly outstanding.
Jeremy Rutherford: He'll be a restricted free agent after next season, so the Blues will hold his rights. Would they re-sign him if he had a bad year this year? Yes, of course.

Oshie isn't a player that you can judge by points. Having said that, 18 goals and 48 points (second on the team) is pretty good for a second-year player. He does so much more than score.

If the Blues didn't want to sign Oshie, he'd have 29 other teams lining up.

Mike: I've been hearing about ownership issues putting the Blues at risk of moving to another city, and up until recently it has all been local. About a week or so ago I read about it on ESPN's NHL page and it hit pretty hard hearing it on a national level. Do you think there is any real chance of this happening?
Jeremy Rutherford:

Possible, but premature at this point.

Jeremy Rutherford: OK, that'll do it today. I apologize for the confusion on the "bonus cushion" and Gretzky's 99 being retired by the league. As always, thanks for the questions and we'll chat next week ....