JR Live
Blues beat writer Jeremy Rutherford goes one-on-one with readers from 1-2 p.m. Thursday in a live chat.
Thursday, July 15, 2010 01:00 PM CDT
comments & answers
Hi Jeremy. I'm sure this has been asked before, but is there any interest from the Blues in Frolov? If not, what do you think is the reason why? Thanks very much. Dave
Jeremy Rutherford:
Frolov has the talent, but he's too often invisible. He's 28, he's big and twice in his career he's scored 30-plus goals. But after scoring 32 goals two years ago, he had 19 last year. His contract was $4 million last year, so it appears that teams aren't willing to risk that kind of money in a player who's been inconsistent.
Frolov has the talent, but he's too often invisible. He's 28, he's big and twice in his career he's scored 30-plus goals. But after scoring 32 goals two years ago, he had 19 last year. His contract was $4 million last year, so it appears that teams aren't willing to risk that kind of money in a player who's been inconsistent.
JR,
Thanks for staying on top of the Blues coverage. I have 2 questions:
1-Surely the Blues are still actively pursuing a goal scorer for this season, right? Tell me honestly that they are not thinking they are good with what they have now.
2-What's up with Tarasenko: is he going to get out of his KHL contract or is he stuck in Russia? We've got to have some scoring. Sorry if I'm panicing, but unless Oshie, Berglund, Backes, Boyes & even Perron start suddenly living up to their hype or whatever, it's going to be a long year.
Thanks for staying on top of the Blues coverage. I have 2 questions:
1-Surely the Blues are still actively pursuing a goal scorer for this season, right? Tell me honestly that they are not thinking they are good with what they have now.
2-What's up with Tarasenko: is he going to get out of his KHL contract or is he stuck in Russia? We've got to have some scoring. Sorry if I'm panicing, but unless Oshie, Berglund, Backes, Boyes & even Perron start suddenly living up to their hype or whatever, it's going to be a long year.
Jeremy Rutherford:
1. This is the team the Blues will go to camp with, barring any late-summer trades.
2. Tarasenko will play in Russia next season, and the team hopes he could play in North America in 2011-12.
I believe, like you, the Blues needed to add some goal-scoring to the roster. I don't doubt that Backes and Boyes can bounce back and score more, and that Oshie and others can step up. However, if the Blues get to December and January and goal-scoring is a problem, it will be shame on them. They knew their weakness and didn't address it.
1. This is the team the Blues will go to camp with, barring any late-summer trades.
2. Tarasenko will play in Russia next season, and the team hopes he could play in North America in 2011-12.
I believe, like you, the Blues needed to add some goal-scoring to the roster. I don't doubt that Backes and Boyes can bounce back and score more, and that Oshie and others can step up. However, if the Blues get to December and January and goal-scoring is a problem, it will be shame on them. They knew their weakness and didn't address it.
Hey JR, any chance the Blues wrap up their RFA's by the end of July? Camp is right around the corner and the last thing we need is guys coming in with recent contracts in their minds.
Jeremy Rutherford: The Blues announced the re-signing of Tyson Strachan today. He signed a one-year, two-way deal. That means the Blues are down to three unsigned restricted free agents: Erik Johnson, David Perron and D.J. King.
From the people I've spoken with, the Blues and Johnson aren't close to a deal right now. They've only had a few talks and, at this point, aren't on the same page. I've written in the past that it may come down to a one-year deal for Johnson. Talks with Perron were said to be underway, but I've haven't heard anything in the last few days.
And as far as King's contract, that's surprising that it hasn't been finished by now. Janssen signed his one-year, $600,000 deal recently. The Blues are offering King something similar. To me what's interesting is how the contract Derek Boogaard signed with the Rangers is affecting deals with other enforcers. Boogy signed a three-year deal worth $1.65 per season. If I'm D.J. King, even though I've been hurt a lot lately, I'm thinking I broke that guy's nose. Why should I make half of what he does?
From the people I've spoken with, the Blues and Johnson aren't close to a deal right now. They've only had a few talks and, at this point, aren't on the same page. I've written in the past that it may come down to a one-year deal for Johnson. Talks with Perron were said to be underway, but I've haven't heard anything in the last few days.
And as far as King's contract, that's surprising that it hasn't been finished by now. Janssen signed his one-year, $600,000 deal recently. The Blues are offering King something similar. To me what's interesting is how the contract Derek Boogaard signed with the Rangers is affecting deals with other enforcers. Boogy signed a three-year deal worth $1.65 per season. If I'm D.J. King, even though I've been hurt a lot lately, I'm thinking I broke that guy's nose. Why should I make half of what he does?
Hey JR,
Do you see the Blues going after a forward once Perron and EJ are signed? I think a guy like Ponikarovsky would be a good pickup for them and not that big of a cap hit. Possibly even Frolov, the longer he stays out there, the more I like him.
Also, have you heard anything rumors about the Blues possibly bringing back Demitra for little money as a locker room guy?
Thanks!
Do you see the Blues going after a forward once Perron and EJ are signed? I think a guy like Ponikarovsky would be a good pickup for them and not that big of a cap hit. Possibly even Frolov, the longer he stays out there, the more I like him.
Also, have you heard anything rumors about the Blues possibly bringing back Demitra for little money as a locker room guy?
Thanks!
Jeremy Rutherford:
Ponikarovsky and Frolov have been mentioned as options, but evidently they're not being considered by the Blues, who have said this is the team they're going to camp with.
I've heard the Demitra rumors, but I don't believe them to be true. He played pretty well at the Olympics, but at this stage of his career, I don't think it makes sense for the Blues.
Ponikarovsky and Frolov have been mentioned as options, but evidently they're not being considered by the Blues, who have said this is the team they're going to camp with.
I've heard the Demitra rumors, but I don't believe them to be true. He played pretty well at the Olympics, but at this stage of his career, I don't think it makes sense for the Blues.
Hey JR,
In your opinion with the team they have now, do the Blues make the playoffs this year? Do you see Checketts making an upper management move if the results aren't there mid-season?
Thanks
In your opinion with the team they have now, do the Blues make the playoffs this year? Do you see Checketts making an upper management move if the results aren't there mid-season?
Thanks
Jeremy Rutherford:
For the Blues to make the playoffs next season, A LOT of things will have to bounce their way. I like the team, but the Blues are counting on a number of players to have VERY good years. Among the forwards, only Andy McDonald, Brad Boyes and David Backes have had 30-goal seasons . . . and only four combined (Boyes 2, Backes 1, McDonald 1). The Blues are relying heavily on the fact that the offense averaged 2.9 goals per game under Davis Payne, after averaging 2.4 under Andy Murray.
Defensively, without another veteran, this group is very young. Certainly there's a lot of good talent, but it's still young. Many are in favor of the Blues sinking or swimming with the likes of Pietrangelo, Cole, Nikitin, etc, to which I'm not opposed, but typically young defensemen take a while to produce consistently. So we'll see . . .
But looking at the Blues' playoff chances in middle of July, they're going to have to score a lot more goals or Jaroslav Halak has to stand on his head.
For the Blues to make the playoffs next season, A LOT of things will have to bounce their way. I like the team, but the Blues are counting on a number of players to have VERY good years. Among the forwards, only Andy McDonald, Brad Boyes and David Backes have had 30-goal seasons . . . and only four combined (Boyes 2, Backes 1, McDonald 1). The Blues are relying heavily on the fact that the offense averaged 2.9 goals per game under Davis Payne, after averaging 2.4 under Andy Murray.
Defensively, without another veteran, this group is very young. Certainly there's a lot of good talent, but it's still young. Many are in favor of the Blues sinking or swimming with the likes of Pietrangelo, Cole, Nikitin, etc, to which I'm not opposed, but typically young defensemen take a while to produce consistently. So we'll see . . .
But looking at the Blues' playoff chances in middle of July, they're going to have to score a lot more goals or Jaroslav Halak has to stand on his head.
Hey JR,
What is the Blues reasoning for not just rolling thier sleves up and grabbing a guy in free agency who can simply put the biscuit in the basket? We have the money to spend, why not use it?
Kyle
What is the Blues reasoning for not just rolling thier sleves up and grabbing a guy in free agency who can simply put the biscuit in the basket? We have the money to spend, why not use it?
Kyle
Jeremy Rutherford:
Here's what it boils down to. It was a bleak year for free-agent forwards and those available are too expensive. We've witnessed that with Kovalchuk apparently asking for $10 million per season. Alex Frolov is still available, but who wants to pay $4 million-plus for a guy who scored 19 goals last season.
The Blues have a budget, and at some point in free agency, they told themselves that banking on their own players would be a better option than overpaying a free agent. I don't necessarily disagree with that, and fans shouldn't either as they've begged the Blues to give these players a chance. But at the end of the day, they have to produce.
Here's what it boils down to. It was a bleak year for free-agent forwards and those available are too expensive. We've witnessed that with Kovalchuk apparently asking for $10 million per season. Alex Frolov is still available, but who wants to pay $4 million-plus for a guy who scored 19 goals last season.
The Blues have a budget, and at some point in free agency, they told themselves that banking on their own players would be a better option than overpaying a free agent. I don't necessarily disagree with that, and fans shouldn't either as they've begged the Blues to give these players a chance. But at the end of the day, they have to produce.
Hey JR,
As always thanks for the chat!
What can Armstrong do if anything to add skill to this offensively challenged group of blue liners?
Could Halak's puck handling skills help the defense breakout of their zone more quickly.
Nikitin: St.Louis or Poria?
As always thanks for the chat!
What can Armstrong do if anything to add skill to this offensively challenged group of blue liners?
Could Halak's puck handling skills help the defense breakout of their zone more quickly.
Nikitin: St.Louis or Poria?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Outside of signing a puck-moving defenseman, Armstrong did the only thing he could by electing not to re-sign defensive defenseman Mike Weaver and deciding to give guys like Alex Pietrangelo and Ian Cole a chance. Weaver is definitely more experienced and will make less mistakes in his own zone, but if you're looking to improve the transition game, the Blues have to get Pietrangelo and Cole some experience. Pietrangelo, especially, will be adept at moving the puck in the future.
Ty Conklin has great puck-handling skills, too, and that didn't do much for the Blues. They need defensemen who can move the puck better.
I haven't seen Nikitin play, but he has a good shot to make the roster out of camp. As I've said, Strachan, Nikitin, Pietrangelo and Cole will be fighting for two defensive spots.
Outside of signing a puck-moving defenseman, Armstrong did the only thing he could by electing not to re-sign defensive defenseman Mike Weaver and deciding to give guys like Alex Pietrangelo and Ian Cole a chance. Weaver is definitely more experienced and will make less mistakes in his own zone, but if you're looking to improve the transition game, the Blues have to get Pietrangelo and Cole some experience. Pietrangelo, especially, will be adept at moving the puck in the future.
Ty Conklin has great puck-handling skills, too, and that didn't do much for the Blues. They need defensemen who can move the puck better.
I haven't seen Nikitin play, but he has a good shot to make the roster out of camp. As I've said, Strachan, Nikitin, Pietrangelo and Cole will be fighting for two defensive spots.
Question regarding the "other goalies" in the Blues organization. With the recent signing of a proven Playoff goaltender, would you agree that our backup and even Peoria goalies should be around for a while and provide consistency for years to come? Also, whats going to be done with the youngster Jake Allen? Peoria?
Jeremy Rutherford: Having Jaroslav Halak will buy more time for Ben Bishop and Jake Allen. Bishop will be in Peoria next year and Allen is expected to be there too. For Bishop, having the AHL experience he does and competing alongside Allen this season in Peoria will be a big challenge. He can handle it, he just has to prove it. Allen may be the better overall prospect, but he is not ready for the NHL yet.
Jr, what is Paul Kariya's status with the Blues? Did the Blues flat out not want to re-sign him at any price or might the two sides be open to discussing a contract if by chance he's still available in a couple months?
Or is there someone else with the same numbers and experience that they might look at before the season starts?
Currently, the Blues have 1 forward over the age of 30. With this being called a "make or break year", it's a little concerning if things unravel.
Or is there someone else with the same numbers and experience that they might look at before the season starts?
Currently, the Blues have 1 forward over the age of 30. With this being called a "make or break year", it's a little concerning if things unravel.
Jeremy Rutherford:
Kariya is a free agent this summer, and the Blues have decided not to offer him a contract. Kariya told the Post-Dispatch after last saeson that, if he wasn't in the Blues' plans, he would have to evaluate whether or not he was going to play again this season. He is 11 games and 11 points shy of 1,000 in both categories, so my guess is that he plays. Pittsburgh has been mentioned as a possible destination for Kariya.
I understand your concern about the under-30 crowd up front. That's why I thought the Blues would have added a veteran scorer, or at least a veteran presence who could fill the void left by Tkachuk and Kariya.
Kariya is a free agent this summer, and the Blues have decided not to offer him a contract. Kariya told the Post-Dispatch after last saeson that, if he wasn't in the Blues' plans, he would have to evaluate whether or not he was going to play again this season. He is 11 games and 11 points shy of 1,000 in both categories, so my guess is that he plays. Pittsburgh has been mentioned as a possible destination for Kariya.
I understand your concern about the under-30 crowd up front. That's why I thought the Blues would have added a veteran scorer, or at least a veteran presence who could fill the void left by Tkachuk and Kariya.
JR,
I am assuming that the Hawks really don't want to dump Sharp or any other really talented guy, much less to a division rival so aside from them, who are some guys that the Blues may be looking to acquire from some of the cap squeezed teams? Or is this the club they are going with and we all need to quit asking?
Thanks,
Tim
I am assuming that the Hawks really don't want to dump Sharp or any other really talented guy, much less to a division rival so aside from them, who are some guys that the Blues may be looking to acquire from some of the cap squeezed teams? Or is this the club they are going with and we all need to quit asking?
Thanks,
Tim
Jeremy Rutherford: I was told that the Blues checked into the Blackhawks' situation (dumping players because they're over the cap), but nothing made sense to club officials.
What are the Blues plans, if any, for Mike Weaver? Last two years, he's been a real good bang for the buck.
What are the pros and cons of buying Brewer out of his contract? It seems like he's barely a 6th defenseman, but earns a lot? Any chance he may break out and prove the naysayers wrong?
What are the pros and cons of buying Brewer out of his contract? It seems like he's barely a 6th defenseman, but earns a lot? Any chance he may break out and prove the naysayers wrong?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Weaver has been very good defensively for the Blues the past two seasons, especially on the PK. I don't think that can be overlooked. The Blues' PK was No. 1 in the league last year, and while I think other guys can fill Weaver's absence (Johnson, etc.), I believe the club will miss Weaver.
As far as Brewer, the Blues aren't going to buyout his contract. For starters, they've still got Jay McKee's contract ($1.3 million) on the books this season. For a team that's financially strapped, they cannot afford to pay guys who aren't on the roster. Brewer has one more year left on his contract. Club officials are excited for the fact that Brewer has been training the entire offseason. Because of injuries, he's been unable to do that that past couple of seasons.
Weaver has been very good defensively for the Blues the past two seasons, especially on the PK. I don't think that can be overlooked. The Blues' PK was No. 1 in the league last year, and while I think other guys can fill Weaver's absence (Johnson, etc.), I believe the club will miss Weaver.
As far as Brewer, the Blues aren't going to buyout his contract. For starters, they've still got Jay McKee's contract ($1.3 million) on the books this season. For a team that's financially strapped, they cannot afford to pay guys who aren't on the roster. Brewer has one more year left on his contract. Club officials are excited for the fact that Brewer has been training the entire offseason. Because of injuries, he's been unable to do that that past couple of seasons.
Hey JR: As the roster stands now, what are your projected 4 lines consisting of and secondly, in your opinion who is more valuable to the Blues King or Janssen?
Jeremy Rutherford:
With the roster taking shape, here are my projected lines. Keep in mind, I like McDonald at center and Backes at right wing.
Perron-McDonald-Backes
Oshie-Berglund-Boyes
Steen-McClement-Crombeen
Winchester/King-Sobotka-D'Agostini/Janssen
With King and Janssen, you could make an argument for both sides. They're two different players. I like both for different reasons and really don't think you could wrong with one of them, but I wouldn't keep both.
With the roster taking shape, here are my projected lines. Keep in mind, I like McDonald at center and Backes at right wing.
Perron-McDonald-Backes
Oshie-Berglund-Boyes
Steen-McClement-Crombeen
Winchester/King-Sobotka-D'Agostini/Janssen
With King and Janssen, you could make an argument for both sides. They're two different players. I like both for different reasons and really don't think you could wrong with one of them, but I wouldn't keep both.
JR,
Great of you to keep the chat going during this bore of an off-season!
Do you have any read on what the Blues financial situation is? As it stands, it looks like the ACTUAL (non cap) salary commitments of the team for the coming year are going to be less than last year - especially if guys like Pietrangelo don't reach many of their bonuses.
Was Armstrong directed to stay within an even tighter budget this year than last year by ownership? Many Blues fans are frustrated by the Winchester signing and Armstrong's recent statement that the team is basically done (aside from signing our own RFAs) adding to the team. If we knew the kind of constraints that the front office was actually under, I think we would be more understanding.
Great of you to keep the chat going during this bore of an off-season!
Do you have any read on what the Blues financial situation is? As it stands, it looks like the ACTUAL (non cap) salary commitments of the team for the coming year are going to be less than last year - especially if guys like Pietrangelo don't reach many of their bonuses.
Was Armstrong directed to stay within an even tighter budget this year than last year by ownership? Many Blues fans are frustrated by the Winchester signing and Armstrong's recent statement that the team is basically done (aside from signing our own RFAs) adding to the team. If we knew the kind of constraints that the front office was actually under, I think we would be more understanding.
Jeremy Rutherford:
The answer is "Yes," there is a tighter budget this season. Just because the Blues were overpaying Kariya ($6 million) doesn't mean that they should spend that money when Kariya comes off the books, but I think most fans thought the Blues would turn that money into something more, especially considering the team's offensive woes.
For a team that has lost money, I think a payroll of $50 million is quite significant, but as I've already written today . . . if the Blues don't make the playoffs and the reason was the lack of offense, the decision not to sign or trade for a goal scorer will lay heavily on the shoulders of ownership/management.
The answer is "Yes," there is a tighter budget this season. Just because the Blues were overpaying Kariya ($6 million) doesn't mean that they should spend that money when Kariya comes off the books, but I think most fans thought the Blues would turn that money into something more, especially considering the team's offensive woes.
For a team that has lost money, I think a payroll of $50 million is quite significant, but as I've already written today . . . if the Blues don't make the playoffs and the reason was the lack of offense, the decision not to sign or trade for a goal scorer will lay heavily on the shoulders of ownership/management.
Any word on whether or not Payne is going to pick his own guy for captain? If you had to bet a Pappy's lunch on it, who do you put your money on to be captain opening night?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I haven't heard anything on this topic in quite a while. I had heard that at least one person in the organization addressed a possible change in captains, but it didn't get very far. I sense the Blues are not wanting to hurt any feelings or cause any distractions heading into the season. If Davis Payne told management that he wanted to change captains, I'm sure he would be allowed to do so. But at this point, I expect Eric Brewer will wear the "C" on opening night.
I haven't heard anything on this topic in quite a while. I had heard that at least one person in the organization addressed a possible change in captains, but it didn't get very far. I sense the Blues are not wanting to hurt any feelings or cause any distractions heading into the season. If Davis Payne told management that he wanted to change captains, I'm sure he would be allowed to do so. But at this point, I expect Eric Brewer will wear the "C" on opening night.
JR, do you know if there has been any update to the FSMW/Dish Network/Mediacom fiasco? It sure would be nice to actually watch Blues games this season.
Jeremy Rutherford:
I was told the other day, and Dan Caesar confirmed this in today's Post-Dispatch, that there has been no progress between FSM and Dish Network regarding Blues' telecasts. For those not familiar with this issue, FSM charged its cable/satellite programers more last season because it was offering more games, and Dish Network balked at the price. As a result, many folks were unable to watch the Blues.
I can't say right now whether it will be settled before the start of next season. I guess you have to stay tuned, unless you have Dish and can't stay tuned.
I was told the other day, and Dan Caesar confirmed this in today's Post-Dispatch, that there has been no progress between FSM and Dish Network regarding Blues' telecasts. For those not familiar with this issue, FSM charged its cable/satellite programers more last season because it was offering more games, and Dish Network balked at the price. As a result, many folks were unable to watch the Blues.
I can't say right now whether it will be settled before the start of next season. I guess you have to stay tuned, unless you have Dish and can't stay tuned.
AS far as i can see the blues have not done much to upgrade there offense are they gonna be making any moves anytime soon to maybe add a guy like gagne or really anybody besides kovalchuk who can score them some goals?
Jeremy Rutherford:
Gagne wouldn't be a bad option, if you can look past his concussion problems. The left winger scored 17 goals and had 40 points in 58 games last season for Philadelphia, and he had nine goals and 12 points in 19 playoff games. He's got one more year left on his contract at $5.5 million. The Blues have the cap room, and Gagne is on the trading block . . . do you take the chance. I would lean toward no. If you pay $5.5 million to a guy who might miss half the season with concussion problems, you're crippling the franchise even further financially. I'm all for the Blues signing an offensive player, but sign one who doesn't have Gagne's recent history.
Gagne wouldn't be a bad option, if you can look past his concussion problems. The left winger scored 17 goals and had 40 points in 58 games last season for Philadelphia, and he had nine goals and 12 points in 19 playoff games. He's got one more year left on his contract at $5.5 million. The Blues have the cap room, and Gagne is on the trading block . . . do you take the chance. I would lean toward no. If you pay $5.5 million to a guy who might miss half the season with concussion problems, you're crippling the franchise even further financially. I'm all for the Blues signing an offensive player, but sign one who doesn't have Gagne's recent history.
Hey JR - Drew from Tucson.
Any chance the Blues have interest in Patrick Sharp? I really like his game and think he would be a great fit!
Any chance the Blues have interest in Patrick Sharp? I really like his game and think he would be a great fit!
Jeremy Rutherford:
Hey Drew ...
It doesn't sound like the 'Hawks are going to part with Sharp. He would be a nice addition, though.
Hey Drew ...
It doesn't sound like the 'Hawks are going to part with Sharp. He would be a nice addition, though.
Hey JR.
Is there still any interest in Stephen Weiss? I have heard Florida is shopping him, and the Canucks are interested. I think he would be a nice fit for the Blues.
Also, what is your favorite hockey stadium, city to visit on the road?
Thanks.
Is there still any interest in Stephen Weiss? I have heard Florida is shopping him, and the Canucks are interested. I think he would be a nice fit for the Blues.
Also, what is your favorite hockey stadium, city to visit on the road?
Thanks.
Jeremy Rutherford:
The Blues definitely had interest in Weiss, and he would be a perfect fit with the Blues. A center who's very solid and a great guy in the locker room. The last I heard was that the Panthers, while they might be shopping him, really like Weiss and won't part with him easily.
As far as arenas, I really like the Saddledome in Calgary. Vancouver and Nashville are my favorite NHL cities.
The Blues definitely had interest in Weiss, and he would be a perfect fit with the Blues. A center who's very solid and a great guy in the locker room. The last I heard was that the Panthers, while they might be shopping him, really like Weiss and won't part with him easily.
As far as arenas, I really like the Saddledome in Calgary. Vancouver and Nashville are my favorite NHL cities.
Any chance the Blues try to get Mike Modano? He has LOADS of experience and would be a great mentor to guys like Berglund, Oshie, Perron, etc......
Jeremy Rutherford:
I thought Modano would be a decent fit for the Blues. He'd be willing to be play third-line minutes and could bring some experience/mentorship abilitiy to the locker room. But from what I can gather, the Blues don't have a lot of interest.
I thought Modano would be a decent fit for the Blues. He'd be willing to be play third-line minutes and could bring some experience/mentorship abilitiy to the locker room. But from what I can gather, the Blues don't have a lot of interest.
JR,
In your opinion where does EJ's offer stand now that Schultz and Hjalmarsson are signed to 4 year deals? Is he in the 'below or above' 3 million/yr range? Any word if the Blues will put together a 4 year deal for the youngster?
thnx,
Ted
In your opinion where does EJ's offer stand now that Schultz and Hjalmarsson are signed to 4 year deals? Is he in the 'below or above' 3 million/yr range? Any word if the Blues will put together a 4 year deal for the youngster?
thnx,
Ted
Jeremy Rutherford: My guess is that the Blues are glad that Johnson can't receive an offer sheet this summer. With the Blackhawks' Hjalmarsson getting a four-year, $14 offer from the Sharks (which Chicago matched) what would Johnson have received?
Hjalmarsson is a very good player, but didn't put up many points and he's averaging $3.6 million per season. I have to believe that if Johnson puts his skates on, he's worth $4 million. The Blues aren't ready to give him $5 million-plus until he proves himself, but if they sign him to a one-year, $4 million extension, and he blows up for 60 points, they could be kicking themselves. Apparently, it's a risk the Blues don't mind taking.
Hjalmarsson is a very good player, but didn't put up many points and he's averaging $3.6 million per season. I have to believe that if Johnson puts his skates on, he's worth $4 million. The Blues aren't ready to give him $5 million-plus until he proves himself, but if they sign him to a one-year, $4 million extension, and he blows up for 60 points, they could be kicking themselves. Apparently, it's a risk the Blues don't mind taking.
If you were the coach, who would be on your first powerplay unit? (Assuming we get EJ and Perron back and everything else remains the same as it is today)
I say Perron-Backes-Berglund
EJ-Petro
I say Perron-Backes-Berglund
EJ-Petro
Jeremy Rutherford:
Sorry, I have to disagree here.
I say: McDonald, Backes and Boyes with Steen and Oshie at the points. Eventually Johnson will man the right point, but for now, Steen has been more than capable.
My second power-play unit would be Berglund, Perron, Winchester, Colaiacovo and Johnson.
Sorry, I have to disagree here.
I say: McDonald, Backes and Boyes with Steen and Oshie at the points. Eventually Johnson will man the right point, but for now, Steen has been more than capable.
My second power-play unit would be Berglund, Perron, Winchester, Colaiacovo and Johnson.
Hey JR,
With the restlessness of the fans and the owner to win, are you afraid that the Blues will walk down the familiar path of trading away their future for immediate results? Do you feel that the Halak for Eller trade could be the start of this trend?
With the restlessness of the fans and the owner to win, are you afraid that the Blues will walk down the familiar path of trading away their future for immediate results? Do you feel that the Halak for Eller trade could be the start of this trend?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I tend to lean the other way. For a few years now, the Blues have been reluctant to trade away some of their prospects for NHL-ready players. In some sense, it makes the rebuilding process drag on longer. At some point, teams have to be willing to trade away some of their top prospects to get better. While I like Eller and think he has a good future in the league, I like the trade and think the Blues really helped themselves. But by no means does the Halak trade mean the Blues are now following a trend that could see them deal Pietrangelo, Cole, Allen for NHL-ready players. They know what they have and they know what they can afford to trade.
I tend to lean the other way. For a few years now, the Blues have been reluctant to trade away some of their prospects for NHL-ready players. In some sense, it makes the rebuilding process drag on longer. At some point, teams have to be willing to trade away some of their top prospects to get better. While I like Eller and think he has a good future in the league, I like the trade and think the Blues really helped themselves. But by no means does the Halak trade mean the Blues are now following a trend that could see them deal Pietrangelo, Cole, Allen for NHL-ready players. They know what they have and they know what they can afford to trade.
I didn't think it was possible, but it appears we're going to be WORSE on offense this year compared to last barring miraculous turnarounds by some obvious players (Boyes, Berglund, Backes.)
I know the fans are clamoring for more offense, but it seems the front office is content with what they've got and "hoping" again that the players elevate their game.
Do you really think that's what they're going to do?
I know the fans are clamoring for more offense, but it seems the front office is content with what they've got and "hoping" again that the players elevate their game.
Do you really think that's what they're going to do?
Jeremy Rutherford: This is a hot topic today, as well it should be.
The Blues are banking on their current roster and unfortunately we won't know if that's a wise decision until December or January.
The Blues are banking on their current roster and unfortunately we won't know if that's a wise decision until December or January.
Hey JR - Thanks for the great work you do!
Now that the Blues have inked Strachan (presumably for depth), what are your thoughts on Petro? Does he basically have to have a horrible camp not to make the big club? I am almost tired of hearing about him - he's almost like a unicorn... does he really even exist? I think it's time you place him in the top 6 or 7. It's sink or swim time. Either he makes it or he doesn't and we close the book on him. He's too big of a prospect to keep sitting on. Will we see him or not?
Thanks!
Chris
Now that the Blues have inked Strachan (presumably for depth), what are your thoughts on Petro? Does he basically have to have a horrible camp not to make the big club? I am almost tired of hearing about him - he's almost like a unicorn... does he really even exist? I think it's time you place him in the top 6 or 7. It's sink or swim time. Either he makes it or he doesn't and we close the book on him. He's too big of a prospect to keep sitting on. Will we see him or not?
Thanks!
Chris
Jeremy Rutherford:
The Blues have Johnson, Brewer, Jackman, Polak and Colaiacovo and they will keep seven. To me, it comes down to Strachan, Pietrangelo, Cole and Nikitin for the last two defensive spots.
The Blues have Johnson, Brewer, Jackman, Polak and Colaiacovo and they will keep seven. To me, it comes down to Strachan, Pietrangelo, Cole and Nikitin for the last two defensive spots.
Should Erik Johnson cut the Blues some slack on his salary since the Blues payed him 3 million when he was injured by a golf cart? If I remember the Blues were not legally required to pay in this case.
Jeremy Rutherford: Clarifying one thing, Johnson was paid about $800,000 the year he sat out with the knee injury. He would have had to earn his bonuses to make $3 million, and obviously he couldn't do that when he wasn't playing.
It's a fair question. Regardless of how the accident happened, the Blues could have pursued options where they wouldn't have had to pay Johnson. But they didn't do that, and in part, it was to keep Johnson happy. I'm sure the Blues felt that decision could also help them in future negotiations, but I don't think that should be the case.
It's a business and just because the Blues passed up on their chance to hold onto some of Johnson's 2008-09 salary, he doesn't have to ask for less money on his next contract. There would be a lot of ramifications if he did that. That could affect his next contract and so on and so on. Also, comparables are done throughout the NHL on players, meaning if Johnson takes less, other players could be forced to take less by their teams if they don't measure up to Johnson. I'm sure the NHLPA would not be in favor of Johnson giving the Blues a discount because he was paid his salary in '08-09.
It's a fair question. Regardless of how the accident happened, the Blues could have pursued options where they wouldn't have had to pay Johnson. But they didn't do that, and in part, it was to keep Johnson happy. I'm sure the Blues felt that decision could also help them in future negotiations, but I don't think that should be the case.
It's a business and just because the Blues passed up on their chance to hold onto some of Johnson's 2008-09 salary, he doesn't have to ask for less money on his next contract. There would be a lot of ramifications if he did that. That could affect his next contract and so on and so on. Also, comparables are done throughout the NHL on players, meaning if Johnson takes less, other players could be forced to take less by their teams if they don't measure up to Johnson. I'm sure the NHLPA would not be in favor of Johnson giving the Blues a discount because he was paid his salary in '08-09.
Any chance a prospect such as Phil Mcrae or Brett Sonne improved greatly wih summer training and steal a roster spot in camp, it seemed like Mcrae hung around camp until pretty close to the end last year?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I saw McRae at the summer workouts, and he's looking good. But he would have to be very impressive to win a spot in camp. Some of you have to keep this in mind: the Blues are NOT going to keep McRae and send Janssen/Winchester/Crombeen to Peoria. They are different players, different roles. If you want McRae on the roster, you're sending Oshie/Perron/Berglund to Peoria. Who's up for it now?
I saw McRae at the summer workouts, and he's looking good. But he would have to be very impressive to win a spot in camp. Some of you have to keep this in mind: the Blues are NOT going to keep McRae and send Janssen/Winchester/Crombeen to Peoria. They are different players, different roles. If you want McRae on the roster, you're sending Oshie/Perron/Berglund to Peoria. Who's up for it now?
JR,
Thanks for all your good work, as usual.
What do you think are the chances that there will be another work stoppage when this current CBA runs out? It seems as though some teams are already preparing for this scenario by being careful to watch what they are paying players.
Second,
Do you think Doug Armstrong feels a need to put his "label" on this team? I know he very well could have already with the Halak trade, but do you see him makig any "drastic" moves prior to the season, or if the Blues get out of the gate slow, as they have in the past couple a years, that Army will make a "statement" trade to shake up the team?
Thanks again for all your work.
Thanks for all your good work, as usual.
What do you think are the chances that there will be another work stoppage when this current CBA runs out? It seems as though some teams are already preparing for this scenario by being careful to watch what they are paying players.
Second,
Do you think Doug Armstrong feels a need to put his "label" on this team? I know he very well could have already with the Halak trade, but do you see him makig any "drastic" moves prior to the season, or if the Blues get out of the gate slow, as they have in the past couple a years, that Army will make a "statement" trade to shake up the team?
Thanks again for all your work.
Jeremy Rutherford:
I suppose there's a chance, but the players recently picked up the option for another year of the current CBA. So while anything is possible, I don't think we have a dark cloud hanging over the league right now. As far as teams preparing for this, I think they're careful about what they're paying players because of who they might have to sign the following year. For example, the Kings won't give Kovalchuk the money he wants because they're going to have to sign some of their young talent next summer. A guy like Drew Doughty is up for an extension next year.
As you mentioned, Armstrong made a bold move trading for Halak. I don't get the feeling he has to put his stamp on the team. If he does, it's not something that can be done overnight. It's a series of moves where after three years, you look at the roster and Armstrong acquired three-fourths of the team. To me, Armstrong doesn't feel a lot of pressure to make a lot of moves as quickly as he can.
I suppose there's a chance, but the players recently picked up the option for another year of the current CBA. So while anything is possible, I don't think we have a dark cloud hanging over the league right now. As far as teams preparing for this, I think they're careful about what they're paying players because of who they might have to sign the following year. For example, the Kings won't give Kovalchuk the money he wants because they're going to have to sign some of their young talent next summer. A guy like Drew Doughty is up for an extension next year.
As you mentioned, Armstrong made a bold move trading for Halak. I don't get the feeling he has to put his stamp on the team. If he does, it's not something that can be done overnight. It's a series of moves where after three years, you look at the roster and Armstrong acquired three-fourths of the team. To me, Armstrong doesn't feel a lot of pressure to make a lot of moves as quickly as he can.
Hello,
I think the Blues need a tradition or something to be known for. Can you think of anything that the Blues could implement at the Arena? The Dreadwings have the whole "Hockey Town" and Octopus thing. Blackhawks have the song. We need something that says ST. LOUIS BLUES HOCKEY! (without actually saying it). One other thing is why are the Blues waiting to give the "C" to someone else (Backes) when it is obvious that it would be a popular move. Let's Go Blues!
I think the Blues need a tradition or something to be known for. Can you think of anything that the Blues could implement at the Arena? The Dreadwings have the whole "Hockey Town" and Octopus thing. Blackhawks have the song. We need something that says ST. LOUIS BLUES HOCKEY! (without actually saying it). One other thing is why are the Blues waiting to give the "C" to someone else (Backes) when it is obvious that it would be a popular move. Let's Go Blues!
Jeremy Rutherford:
The Towel Man will not be very happy after reading this ....
The Towel Man will not be very happy after reading this ....
How do you see the lines shaking out next year? Is there anyway that we could see the "kid" line reunited? They sure seemed to complement each other well two seasons ago. I guess the issue becomes who gets left out of the top six: Backes, Boyes, Mcdonald, or Steen. It seems to me that lines of Boyes-McDonald-Backes, Perron-Berglund-Oshie, Steen-McClement-D'Agostini? Could end up being better than the doom and gloomers seem to think.
Jeremy Rutherford: I'm sure we'll see every variation at some point in the season, but earlier I mentioned Perron-McDonald-Backes. That line, if I'm not mistaken, enjoyed some success against Vancouver in the playoffs two years ago. (Did I just use the word success about a series in which the Blues were swept?) Anyway, McDonald was playing wing and Backes center when they played together, but I would think that with McDonald at center and Backes at wing, they could still be formidable.
JR -
Is Davis Payne the man to lead this young team deep into the playoffs, or is he a stopgap solution until Blues mgmt. finds someone better? Personally, I mostly like what I've seen so far...I just wish he would show more fire and passion behind the bench, especially when the Blues are getting pillaged by the ref's, which happended alot last year.
Thanks,
Matteo, St. Louis - true Blue fan since the beginning...
Is Davis Payne the man to lead this young team deep into the playoffs, or is he a stopgap solution until Blues mgmt. finds someone better? Personally, I mostly like what I've seen so far...I just wish he would show more fire and passion behind the bench, especially when the Blues are getting pillaged by the ref's, which happended alot last year.
Thanks,
Matteo, St. Louis - true Blue fan since the beginning...
Jeremy Rutherford: I like what Davis Payne did in the second half of last season. I don't know that we should read too much into any lack of passion we saw in Payne last year. Behind the scenes, I witnessed plenty of passion from him. He'll get more comfortable on an NHL bench as he gets more games under his belt.
But going back to your original question, the Blues definitely aren't looking at him as a stop-gap. Payne has been viewed as the organization's coach of the future for a while, and that path was sped up when the team fired Andy Murray. Whether he winds up being a stop gap, that's up to him and the team.
But going back to your original question, the Blues definitely aren't looking at him as a stop-gap. Payne has been viewed as the organization's coach of the future for a while, and that path was sped up when the team fired Andy Murray. Whether he winds up being a stop gap, that's up to him and the team.
Hey JR, I was curious as to your thoughts on when/if the Blues are going to stop "counting" on players to have bounceback or breakout seasons and take a chance on one of the remaining FA's??? I feel like these guys are under so much pressure to perform, and in some cases, perform beyond their means that it could be hindering performance. Adding a second tier scorer could do more than just add 20 goals. Thoughts?
Jeremy Rutherford: You make good points, but who . . . Eric Bellanger, Alexei Ponikarovsky . . . I might take a chance on them. These guys aren't going to score a lot, like you said, but could add some experience. Having said that, are you signing those guys at the expense of ice time of your young forwards who might be ready to break out? It's a fine line. What if you give Belanger some of Berglund's game/minutes and Berglund never gets going? What if you give Ponikarovsky some of Perron's time? Yes, I think the Blues need more on offense, but if it's not Kovalchuk or somebody who can score, then I'm not certain it's worth it.
With all the talk about Jake Allen being the stronger goalie prospect, what exactly happened to Ben Bishop? Did he not live up to expectations or is he just on a slow track? Thanks
Jeremy Rutherford:
I don't think anything "happened" to Bishop. Like any young goalie, his development is taking some time. But once goalies start to get a bid older, people seem to think something is wrong with them if they're not in the NHL. Bishop might not be the hot-shot prospect he was a couple of years ago, but he's still got a strong upside.
I don't think anything "happened" to Bishop. Like any young goalie, his development is taking some time. But once goalies start to get a bid older, people seem to think something is wrong with them if they're not in the NHL. Bishop might not be the hot-shot prospect he was a couple of years ago, but he's still got a strong upside.
Hi Jeremy, Do the Blues receive any revenue sharing and if yes how much?
Jeremy Rutherford: The bottom 10 teams in the league receive revenue sharing, and yes the Blues have been on the receiving end in recent years. If I'm not mistaken, it's in the $8-10 million neighborhood.
JR,
I feel Barrett Jackman needs to be more of a force on defense, but I believe his jaw was broken in a fight a few years ago and he hasn`t been the same since then.
I feel Barrett Jackman needs to be more of a force on defense, but I believe his jaw was broken in a fight a few years ago and he hasn`t been the same since then.
Jeremy Rutherford:
Fans have been debating Jackman's effectiveness the past couple of seasons, but I can say that his broken jaw a few years has no bearing on whether he's a force or not. Jackman is a pretty tough customer, and if his play has slipped, I can think of many more reasons(regular wear and tear, injuries, rule changes) that I would rank before getting his jaw broken.
Fans have been debating Jackman's effectiveness the past couple of seasons, but I can say that his broken jaw a few years has no bearing on whether he's a force or not. Jackman is a pretty tough customer, and if his play has slipped, I can think of many more reasons(regular wear and tear, injuries, rule changes) that I would rank before getting his jaw broken.
JR, what are your thoughts on the Rundblad trade? I guess that was the 'least' the blues had to give up for the pick, as far as they saw it, but as you rank the defensive prospects do you think it would have been better to give him or Jonas up?
Jeremy Rutherford: Basically, Rundblad for Tarasenko . . . I think you have to like it on the surface. Rundblad may turn out to be a solid NHL defenseman, but the reports on Tarasenko are pretty impressive.
I don't know this for fact, but I seriously doubt Ottawa would have done the deal for Junland. They really liked Rundblad and they were looking for a defenseman who was one step closer to the NHL than one of the 2010 draft picks. I wouldn't think they'd be interested in a player who was very close to the NHL and decided to go back to Europe.
I don't know this for fact, but I seriously doubt Ottawa would have done the deal for Junland. They really liked Rundblad and they were looking for a defenseman who was one step closer to the NHL than one of the 2010 draft picks. I wouldn't think they'd be interested in a player who was very close to the NHL and decided to go back to Europe.
JR,
Who do you see as our third line as we stand today?
With the importance of gate receipts from a home playoff game, don't you think this team must make the playoffs this year to allow for some financial flexibility in the future? I just don't see where the scoring is going to come from with our current lineup.
Who do you see as our third line as we stand today?
With the importance of gate receipts from a home playoff game, don't you think this team must make the playoffs this year to allow for some financial flexibility in the future? I just don't see where the scoring is going to come from with our current lineup.
Jeremy Rutherford:
Steen-McClement-Crombeen . . . unless the Blues think Steen can continue to score goals and they give him some time on the top two lines. Also Crombeen isn't a given on the third line. He's going to have to play much better than he did last year, and produce offensively, or he could see time on the fourth line.
I agree that this is an important year in regards to making the playoffs.
Steen-McClement-Crombeen . . . unless the Blues think Steen can continue to score goals and they give him some time on the top two lines. Also Crombeen isn't a given on the third line. He's going to have to play much better than he did last year, and produce offensively, or he could see time on the fourth line.
I agree that this is an important year in regards to making the playoffs.
I saw your #1 PP unit had 5 forwards. Isn't Souray a solid fit for this team? He would improve the PP on day 1. Would a Brewer for Souray deal be reasonable?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I'm not a Souray fan, especially with two years left on his contract. And as I mentioned, eventually Erik Johnson will be on that No. 1 power play.
I'm not a Souray fan, especially with two years left on his contract. And as I mentioned, eventually Erik Johnson will be on that No. 1 power play.
JR,
Do you think the Blues Powerplay will be better this with a full camp/year under Davis Payne's system? Was his system ever fully implemented last year?
Thanks,
Tim
Do you think the Blues Powerplay will be better this with a full camp/year under Davis Payne's system? Was his system ever fully implemented last year?
Thanks,
Tim
Jeremy Rutherford:
The power play was a little better under Davis Payne. The key may be returning to the scheme used two years ago when the Blues finished eighth on the PP. I know I've mentioned this before, but after Andy Murray was fired, some players grumbled that he changed the power play at the start of last season. They were dumbfounded because of the success the unit had the year before.
The power play was a little better under Davis Payne. The key may be returning to the scheme used two years ago when the Blues finished eighth on the PP. I know I've mentioned this before, but after Andy Murray was fired, some players grumbled that he changed the power play at the start of last season. They were dumbfounded because of the success the unit had the year before.
With Johnson demanding to be paid like a number one D-Man and not actually proving he is that yet, that kind of makes me think he may not be a team player. Do you know how he is in the locker room?
Jeremy Rutherford:
If he would have played three full seasons, everyone would know a lot more about his development. Unfortunately, he can't get that missed year back. The two sides are going to have to agree on something and move forward. That's why I think a one-year contract extension is probably what it will come down to. Johnson is good in the locker room.
If he would have played three full seasons, everyone would know a lot more about his development. Unfortunately, he can't get that missed year back. The two sides are going to have to agree on something and move forward. That's why I think a one-year contract extension is probably what it will come down to. Johnson is good in the locker room.
So we're clearly uninterested in pursuing Kovalchuk. The Devils keep popping up as a frontrunner for Kovy, pricing Parise out of an extension. When is it okay to start day dreaming about Zach flying around the ice in the Blue Note?
Jeremy Rutherford: Not that Parise is going to become available, but that's what the Blues have to think about. If other teams put themselves in a bind, the Blues might be able to take advantage of that in the coming years. That doesn't mean that shouldn't sign a Kovalchuk if they have the means to do it. What I'm saying is, it doesn't make sense to go sign just SOMEBODY when in two years that SOMEBODY could prevent you from signing a really productive player.
This probably wouldn't happen, but what if the Blues signed Frolov for three years, $12 million, and in two years, a player like Parise did become available? Teams can't think about the current year in the age of the salary cap. You always have to be thinking ahead.
This probably wouldn't happen, but what if the Blues signed Frolov for three years, $12 million, and in two years, a player like Parise did become available? Teams can't think about the current year in the age of the salary cap. You always have to be thinking ahead.
Hey, JR. Do you think the Blues are waiting for the bumper crop of great free agents next summer instead of making any moves this year?
Jeremy Rutherford:
DING. DING. DING. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
DING. DING. DING. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
Jr
Does the Halak trade make Allen expendable? What is, if any, the market for Allen or Bishop?
Does the Halak trade make Allen expendable? What is, if any, the market for Allen or Bishop?
Jeremy Rutherford:
No, I don't believe so. Allen will be 20 years old and has a bright future. As talented as Halak looks to be, the Blues don't want to push Allen to the side. Even if Halak has 5-7 good years in St. Louis, Allen will be 25-27 by then.
I don't know that there's a market right now for Bishop. The Blues like the idea of Bishop and Allen in Peoria next year.
No, I don't believe so. Allen will be 20 years old and has a bright future. As talented as Halak looks to be, the Blues don't want to push Allen to the side. Even if Halak has 5-7 good years in St. Louis, Allen will be 25-27 by then.
I don't know that there's a market right now for Bishop. The Blues like the idea of Bishop and Allen in Peoria next year.
Who is Nathan Oystrick?
Does he make the Blues roster?
Does he make the Blues roster?
Jeremy Rutherford: That's a depth signing for Peoria.
JR, out of the following players, which will likely play center and which will likely play wing?
McDonald, Backes, Oshie, Berglund, Sobotka & Hensick.
McDonald, Backes, Oshie, Berglund, Sobotka & Hensick.
Jeremy Rutherford:
McDonald: He wants to play center
Backes: He's good at center, but I believe he prefers wing.
Oshie: He was very good at center in limited opportunity, but I believe he'll play wing.
Berglund: He will be in the middle, but will have to step up to keep his role as the No. 2 center
Sobotka: Boston writers told me that he's MUCH better at center than wing.
Hensick: He can play both. I'm not sure where he's better suited.
McDonald: He wants to play center
Backes: He's good at center, but I believe he prefers wing.
Oshie: He was very good at center in limited opportunity, but I believe he'll play wing.
Berglund: He will be in the middle, but will have to step up to keep his role as the No. 2 center
Sobotka: Boston writers told me that he's MUCH better at center than wing.
Hensick: He can play both. I'm not sure where he's better suited.
Thanks for the chat JR!
I was wondering where you think the Blues will finish in the standings this season. It's hard to imagine this team being better than last year. We lost Walt, Kariya and Weaver and replaced them with Sobotka, Winchester (now likely full-time), and Strachan. Sure we acquired Halak, but unless he starts jumping into the play to create some odd-man rushes, I don't see how it helps our problems.
We have to be on the outside looking in again and probably a top 10 pick in the draft. Don't ya think?
I was wondering where you think the Blues will finish in the standings this season. It's hard to imagine this team being better than last year. We lost Walt, Kariya and Weaver and replaced them with Sobotka, Winchester (now likely full-time), and Strachan. Sure we acquired Halak, but unless he starts jumping into the play to create some odd-man rushes, I don't see how it helps our problems.
We have to be on the outside looking in again and probably a top 10 pick in the draft. Don't ya think?
Jeremy Rutherford:
I don't think the Blues are a bottom-10 team, but as I wrote earlier, I think a lot has to go their way to make the playoffs.
I don't think the Blues are a bottom-10 team, but as I wrote earlier, I think a lot has to go their way to make the playoffs.
JR - What is the salary cap impact if the club releases one of the players currently under contract? While incomplete, with the unsigned restricted free agents, how do you think the Blues will stack up against the cap?
Jeremy Rutherford: If you waive a player, or send him to Peoria, he doesn't count against the cap. It's only NHL salaries on the NHL roster.
Right now, the Blues' cap number is roughly $45.5 million. When Johnson, Perron and King sign, it could be $52 million, give or take. The salary cap in the NHL next year is $59.4 million, so the Blues should be $7 million or so below it.
Right now, the Blues' cap number is roughly $45.5 million. When Johnson, Perron and King sign, it could be $52 million, give or take. The salary cap in the NHL next year is $59.4 million, so the Blues should be $7 million or so below it.
Ok, just a small gripe about the new PD layout. I'm ok with not having a dedicated space for the Morning Skate, but at least ask them to add back in the ability to view previous posts when you are already looking at a Morning Skate. It should be easier to go to twitter to get your links because you can't find them on the PD site!
Jeremy Rutherford:
You have just notified the people in charge.
You have just notified the people in charge.
Since Halak is signed, I am wondering how you think our Blues defense compared to the Canadians defense last year. I know we will have new faces in front of Halak this year. I see we had the same Goals Against total 223. Just wondering if you think Halak will have same support level or improved? Pure speculation, I know. Thanks
Jeremy Rutherford: Great question. Montreal's defense last year included Marc-Andre Bergeron, Andrei Markov, Roman Hamrlik, Jaroslav Spacek and Hall Gill. The Canadiens get the edge in both experience and offensive-minded defensemen. Considering we don't know what to expect from Strachan, Pietrangelo, Cole or Nikitin, I would say Montreal definitely has the better overall group. The Blues might have some solid defensive defensemen, such as Roman Polak, or Barret Jackman, but Halak was certainly helped by the Canadiens ability to move the puck up ice.
most popular
not logged in
live discussions
new start career training
Dead end job? Search here for the training you need to revive your career today!
