Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Sienna Miller’s head moved to different body
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  • Email this
  • Print this

New York Magazine proclaimed: “We Are Not Surprised Vogue Photoshopped Sienna Miller’s Head onto a Different Body.”

I’m appalled. And if I were Sienna Miller, I’d feel a bit humiliated.

How low will we go to protect this ideal of beauty that is so unattainable that the most beautiful among us are unworthy.

In a behind-the-scenes documentary, “The September Issue,” which debuted at Sundance recently.

Infamous Vogue editor Anna Wintour calls Miller “toothy” and others lamented her “unruly hair.”

She was airbrushed to look like a porcelain statue in the photo shoot with renowned photographer Mario Testino for the September 2007 cover shot. In the end, they took one photo of her face and super-imposed it on a separate picture of her body.

Apparently all the other head-body shots were unsatisfactory. It can be so tricky coordinating the two.

NY Mag’s blog writes: “We’re not shocked at all …

Magazines do this all the time, especially with actresses who are not models and don’t come out looking as close to perfect on camera. Photo retouchers always – on models and actresses – remove arm hairs, smooth knee caps and arm-pit wrinkles, get rid of blemishes, veins, and under-eye shadows, and take shine off the face. Each photo is different but other common adjustments include slimming of hips, removing lower-belly shadows, slimming noses, and changing eye color. What you see in magazines isn’t real at all!”

Above the British actress is shown at an event in November. Does she look disfigured to you. OK, the head position and the hair make her look like she’s lost her neck somewhere, but I assure you that it is there and it’s lovely. (AP Photo/Joel Ryan)

The NY Mag blog concludes: “If readers are never able to attain physical ideals in these magazines, they’ll keep buying them for more diet and beauty tips, right?”

Do you think magazines should alter photos?

View Results

Loading ... Loading …

The story was first reported at The Huffington Post which also reported, “The magazine released a statement praising Miller’s beauty, saying, ‘While some retouching is a fact for any cover, no one is more convinced of Ms. Miller’s beauty than Vogue. The fact she’s appeared on the magazine’s September cover, our most important issue of the year, is a testimony to this truth.”

reader comments

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in the STLtoday community, but we ask you to follow . Basically, be civil, smart, on-topic and free from profanity. Don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read! And remember: We may miss some, so we need your help to police these comments. Please identify the comment, the story and why you think it's objectionable. Read the commenting guidelines

Comments are closed.

One Comment

  1. garricks  January 30, 2009 at 1:36 UTC

    We graphic artists routinely ’shop (use Photoshop) photos, the same way they have been airbrushed for decades. I seem to remember TV Guide putting Oprah’s head on someone else’s body sometime in the ’90s.

    This goes way too far, though. For more examples, visit the Photoshop Disasters blog at http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/ (some content not safe for work.)

    Report this comment

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0